The Path to Independence: Progression in Entrustment Reflected in Entrustable Professional Activity Ratings.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000007114
Andrada Diaconescu, Julia Kasmirski, Erin White, James R Korndorffer, M Chandler McLeod, George Sarosi, Carol Barry, Andrew Jones, Rebecca M Minter, Karen J Brasel, Brenessa Lindeman
{"title":"The Path to Independence: Progression in Entrustment Reflected in Entrustable Professional Activity Ratings.","authors":"Andrada Diaconescu, Julia Kasmirski, Erin White, James R Korndorffer, M Chandler McLeod, George Sarosi, Carol Barry, Andrew Jones, Rebecca M Minter, Karen J Brasel, Brenessa Lindeman","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000007114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2016 the American Board of Surgery introduced Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) as an assessment framework to support competency-based education within general surgery. EPAs operationalize milestones and competencies into a practical assessment framework, enabling timely, targeted feedback and progressive entrustment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesize that variability in trainee entrustment may identify specific EPAs that function as performance targets, allowing earlier identification of trainees who may need additional support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National ABS EPA data for PGY-1 through PGY-5 residents from July 2023 to July 2025 were reviewed. Microassessments (MAs) using the ABS entrustment scale (1=Limited Participation; 4=Practice Ready) were compared by EPA, phase, and postgraduate year. Descriptive statistics summarized formative entrustment ratings and progression within postgraduate year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects included 9,932 residents from 345 programs, with 185,901 EPA MAs. For several intraoperative EPAs, over half of trainees achieved a median formative assessment of Indirect Supervision/Practice Ready at the PGY-3 level, including appendicitis (58.2%, n=819), abdominal wall hernia (50.4%, n=618), breast disease (52.7%, n=309), and cutaneous/subcutaneous neoplasm (66%, n=325). Colon disease (73.4%, n=756), gallbladder disease (86.6%, n=1410), inguinal hernia (76.5%, n=734), and thyroid/parathyroid disease (61.3%, n=184) showed a slower progression, not achieving 50% of residents until the PGY-4 level. Earlier progression was noted for soft tissue infection with 54.8% (n=355) attaining indirect supervision or higher at the PGY-2 level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of EPAs and shift towards competency-based assessment enables the identification of periods of rapid entrustment progression and supports the identification of targets that may facilitate the development of a competency-based training framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"573-581"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000007114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2016 the American Board of Surgery introduced Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) as an assessment framework to support competency-based education within general surgery. EPAs operationalize milestones and competencies into a practical assessment framework, enabling timely, targeted feedback and progressive entrustment.

Objective: We hypothesize that variability in trainee entrustment may identify specific EPAs that function as performance targets, allowing earlier identification of trainees who may need additional support.

Methods: National ABS EPA data for PGY-1 through PGY-5 residents from July 2023 to July 2025 were reviewed. Microassessments (MAs) using the ABS entrustment scale (1=Limited Participation; 4=Practice Ready) were compared by EPA, phase, and postgraduate year. Descriptive statistics summarized formative entrustment ratings and progression within postgraduate year.

Results: Subjects included 9,932 residents from 345 programs, with 185,901 EPA MAs. For several intraoperative EPAs, over half of trainees achieved a median formative assessment of Indirect Supervision/Practice Ready at the PGY-3 level, including appendicitis (58.2%, n=819), abdominal wall hernia (50.4%, n=618), breast disease (52.7%, n=309), and cutaneous/subcutaneous neoplasm (66%, n=325). Colon disease (73.4%, n=756), gallbladder disease (86.6%, n=1410), inguinal hernia (76.5%, n=734), and thyroid/parathyroid disease (61.3%, n=184) showed a slower progression, not achieving 50% of residents until the PGY-4 level. Earlier progression was noted for soft tissue infection with 54.8% (n=355) attaining indirect supervision or higher at the PGY-2 level.

Conclusions: The introduction of EPAs and shift towards competency-based assessment enables the identification of periods of rapid entrustment progression and supports the identification of targets that may facilitate the development of a competency-based training framework.

通往独立之路:可信赖专业活动评级反映的委托进展。
背景:2016年,美国外科委员会引入了可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)作为评估框架,以支持普外科的能力基础教育。EPAs将里程碑和能力纳入实际的评估框架,实现及时、有针对性的反馈和渐进的委托。目的:我们假设受训者委托的可变性可能会识别出作为绩效目标的特定epa,从而允许更早地识别可能需要额外支持的受训者。方法:回顾了2023年7月至2025年7月PGY-1至PGY-5居民的国家ABS EPA数据。采用ABS委托量表(1=有限参与;4=实践准备)的微评估(MAs)按EPA、阶段和研究生学年进行比较。描述性统计总结了研究生年度的形成性委托评级和进展。结果:受试者包括来自345个项目的9,932名居民,其中185,901名EPA ma。对于一些术中EPAs,超过一半的受术者达到了PGY-3水平的间接监督/实践准备的中位形成性评估,包括阑尾炎(58.2%,n=819)、腹壁疝(50.4%,n=618)、乳腺疾病(52.7%,n=309)和皮肤/皮下肿瘤(66%,n=325)。结肠疾病(73.4%,n=756)、胆囊疾病(86.6%,n=1410)、腹股沟疝(76.5%,n=734)和甲状腺/甲状旁腺疾病(61.3%,n=184)进展较慢,直到PGY-4水平才达到50%。软组织感染的早期进展值得注意,54.8% (n=355)获得间接监测或更高的PGY-2水平。结论:环境评估方案的引入和向基于能力的评估的转变,能够确定快速委托进展的时期,并支持确定可能促进基于能力的培训框架发展的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书