CBT vs. Ericksonian Hypnotherapy for subclinical depression and anxiety: 12-month follow-up.

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Eda Yılmazer, Metin Çınaroğlu
{"title":"CBT vs. Ericksonian Hypnotherapy for subclinical depression and anxiety: 12-month follow-up.","authors":"Eda Yılmazer, Metin Çınaroğlu","doi":"10.1080/00029157.2026.2680685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subclinical depression and anxiety are associated with significant psychological suffering, functional impairment, and increased risk of progression to clinical disorders, highlighting the importance of early intervention. This study examined the long-term outcomes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Ericksonian Hypnotherapy (EH) in individuals with subclinical symptoms. Participants from a randomized controlled trial (<i>n</i> = 45) were followed over 12 months, with assessments at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Linear mixed-effects models indicated significant reductions in both depression and anxiety over time, with both CBT and EH outperforming the control condition. Improvements were largely maintained at follow-up, with only minor attenuation. No significant differences were observed between CBT and EH in overall effectiveness, although CBT showed slightly greater stability in depressive symptoms, while EH demonstrated marginally better maintenance of anxiety-related outcomes. Overall, both interventions produced durable and clinically meaningful improvements, supporting the role of early psychological intervention and highlighting EH as a viable complementary or alternative approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":46304,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2026.2680685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subclinical depression and anxiety are associated with significant psychological suffering, functional impairment, and increased risk of progression to clinical disorders, highlighting the importance of early intervention. This study examined the long-term outcomes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Ericksonian Hypnotherapy (EH) in individuals with subclinical symptoms. Participants from a randomized controlled trial (n = 45) were followed over 12 months, with assessments at baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up using the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Linear mixed-effects models indicated significant reductions in both depression and anxiety over time, with both CBT and EH outperforming the control condition. Improvements were largely maintained at follow-up, with only minor attenuation. No significant differences were observed between CBT and EH in overall effectiveness, although CBT showed slightly greater stability in depressive symptoms, while EH demonstrated marginally better maintenance of anxiety-related outcomes. Overall, both interventions produced durable and clinically meaningful improvements, supporting the role of early psychological intervention and highlighting EH as a viable complementary or alternative approach.

CBT与Ericksonian催眠疗法治疗亚临床抑郁和焦虑:12个月的随访。
亚临床抑郁和焦虑与显著的心理痛苦、功能损害和进展为临床障碍的风险增加有关,这突出了早期干预的重要性。本研究考察了认知行为疗法(CBT)和Ericksonian催眠疗法(EH)对亚临床症状个体的长期疗效。随机对照试验的参与者(n = 45)被随访超过12个月,在基线、干预中期、干预后进行评估,并使用Beck抑郁量表- ii和Beck焦虑量表进行随访。线性混合效应模型显示,随着时间的推移,抑郁和焦虑都显著减少,CBT和EH的表现都优于对照组。在随访中,这些改善基本上保持不变,只有轻微的衰减。CBT和EH在总体有效性上没有显著差异,尽管CBT在抑郁症状方面表现出稍强的稳定性,而EH在焦虑相关结果的维持方面表现出稍好的稳定性。总的来说,这两种干预措施都产生了持久的和有临床意义的改善,支持了早期心理干预的作用,并强调了EH作为一种可行的补充或替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
23.10%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis ( AJCH) is the official publication of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis (ASCH). The Journal publishes original scientific articles and clinical case reports on hypnosis, as well as books reviews and abstracts of the current hypnosis literature. The purview of AJCH articles includes multiple and single case studies, empirical research studies, models of treatment, theories of hypnosis, and occasional special articles pertaining to hypnosis. The membership of ASCH and readership of AJCH includes licensed health care professionals and university faculty in the fields of medicine, psychiatry, clinical social work, clinical psychology, dentistry, counseling, and graduate students in these disciplines. AJCH is unique among other hypnosis journals because its primary emphasis on professional applications of hypnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书