Palliative care interventions for thoracic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying the core elements.

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2026-06-10 Print Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0247-2025
Anne M Walker, Donald R Sullivan, Anne E Holland, Phan Nguyen, Sarah Yeo, Amy Pascoe, Lorena Romero, Natasha Smallwood
{"title":"Palliative care interventions for thoracic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis identifying the core elements.","authors":"Anne M Walker, Donald R Sullivan, Anne E Holland, Phan Nguyen, Sarah Yeo, Amy Pascoe, Lorena Romero, Natasha Smallwood","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0247-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increasing trials examining palliative care for people with thoracic cancer, implementation remains limited. Understanding the core elements of palliative care interventions is critical to improving design, scalability, and accessibility globally. This review aimed to determine the core elements and efficacy of palliative care interventions in thoracic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five medical databases were searched from January 1987 to January 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomised studies of palliative care interventions in thoracic cancer addressing at least two National Consensus Project domains were eligible. Meta-analyses of RCTs were performed using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 palliative care interventions (n=6490, mean±sd age 65±10 years, 41% women) were identified. Interventions were categorised as comprehensive palliative care interventions (n=18), nonpharmacological symptom interventions (n=12) and psychosocial-educational interventions (n=4). Comprehensive interventions were significantly longer (21.7 weeks) than nonpharmacological symptom (4.8 weeks) and psychosocial-educational interventions (8.7 weeks; p<0.01), addressed more components (mean components: 8, 3, 4, respectively; p<0.01), were often provided by specialist palliative care clinicians (83%, 16%, 0%; p<0.01), and included interprofessional teams (61%, 8%, 0%; p<0.01). Comprehensive palliative care interventions improved quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.38), survival (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94), overall symptoms (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38) and depression (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-0.5). Nonpharmacological symptom interventions improved breathlessness (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.43) and depression (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.31). Psychosocial-educational interventions did not affect quality of life or mood.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive palliative care interventions improved quality of life, survival and symptoms among people with thoracic cancers. Nonpharmacological symptom interventions improved breathlessness and depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"35 180","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13250679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0247-2025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing trials examining palliative care for people with thoracic cancer, implementation remains limited. Understanding the core elements of palliative care interventions is critical to improving design, scalability, and accessibility globally. This review aimed to determine the core elements and efficacy of palliative care interventions in thoracic cancer.

Methods: Five medical databases were searched from January 1987 to January 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomised studies of palliative care interventions in thoracic cancer addressing at least two National Consensus Project domains were eligible. Meta-analyses of RCTs were performed using a random-effects model.

Results: 34 palliative care interventions (n=6490, mean±sd age 65±10 years, 41% women) were identified. Interventions were categorised as comprehensive palliative care interventions (n=18), nonpharmacological symptom interventions (n=12) and psychosocial-educational interventions (n=4). Comprehensive interventions were significantly longer (21.7 weeks) than nonpharmacological symptom (4.8 weeks) and psychosocial-educational interventions (8.7 weeks; p<0.01), addressed more components (mean components: 8, 3, 4, respectively; p<0.01), were often provided by specialist palliative care clinicians (83%, 16%, 0%; p<0.01), and included interprofessional teams (61%, 8%, 0%; p<0.01). Comprehensive palliative care interventions improved quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.38), survival (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.94), overall symptoms (SMD 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38) and depression (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-0.5). Nonpharmacological symptom interventions improved breathlessness (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.15-0.43) and depression (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.31). Psychosocial-educational interventions did not affect quality of life or mood.

Conclusions: Comprehensive palliative care interventions improved quality of life, survival and symptoms among people with thoracic cancers. Nonpharmacological symptom interventions improved breathlessness and depression.

胸部癌症的姑息治疗干预:确定核心要素的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:尽管越来越多的试验研究了对胸部癌症患者的姑息治疗,但实施仍然有限。了解姑息治疗干预措施的核心要素对于改善全球的设计、可扩展性和可及性至关重要。本综述旨在确定胸廓癌姑息治疗干预的核心要素和疗效。方法:检索1987年1月至2025年1月间的5个医学数据库。至少涉及两个国家共识项目领域的胸廓癌姑息治疗干预的随机对照试验(rct)和非随机研究符合条件。采用随机效应模型对随机对照试验进行meta分析。结果:确定了34项姑息治疗干预措施(n=6490,平均±sd年龄65±10岁,41%为女性)。干预措施分为综合姑息治疗干预措施(n=18)、非药物症状干预措施(n=12)和心理社会教育干预措施(n=4)。综合干预(21.7周)明显长于非药物症状(4.8周)和心理社会教育干预(8.7周)。结论:综合姑息治疗干预改善了胸廓癌患者的生活质量、生存率和症状。非药物症状干预改善了呼吸困难和抑郁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书