A retrospective study on the safety of small and large volume paracentesis and risk factors for adverse events in patients with gastrointestinal cancer with malignant ascites.
{"title":"A retrospective study on the safety of small and large volume paracentesis and risk factors for adverse events in patients with gastrointestinal cancer with malignant ascites.","authors":"Yuri Tsujimoto, Toru Kadono, Shin Kameishi, Nanako Matsuo, Hiroyuki Kodama, Hiroki Yukami, Ken Asaishi, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.21037/apm-2026-1-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal drainage volume for paracentesis in malignant ascites (MA) has not been established, and identifying risk factors for paracentesis may serve as a guideline for clinical decisions regarding drainage volume in MA patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the safety of small-volume drainage (SVD) versus large-volume drainage (LVD) in MA patients and to identify risk factors for adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study analyzed gastrointestinal cancer patients who underwent paracentesis between 2014 and 2023. Patients were categorized into SVD (<3,000 mL) and LVD (≥3,000 mL) groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of paracentesis-related AEs, including hypotension, infection, renal dysfunction, and hyponatremia. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 89 eligible patients, 58 received SVD and 31 received LVD. The incidence of AEs was significantly higher in the LVD group compared to the SVD group (41.9% vs. 20.7%, P=0.04), particularly for hypotension (12.9% vs. 1.7%, P=0.04). In multivariate analysis, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL [odds ratio (OR) 3.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-9.64] and LVD (OR 3.45; 95% CI: 1.20-9.93) were identified as independent risk factors for AEs. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS; P=0.86) or the interval to subsequent paracentesis (P=0.21) between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large-volume paracentesis was associated with a higher risk of AEs without additional efficacy in terms of symptom control. SVD appears to be a safer and equally effective option, especially for patients with low serum albumin. These findings support a conservative and individualized approach to fluid removal in patients with MA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-2026-1-0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The optimal drainage volume for paracentesis in malignant ascites (MA) has not been established, and identifying risk factors for paracentesis may serve as a guideline for clinical decisions regarding drainage volume in MA patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the safety of small-volume drainage (SVD) versus large-volume drainage (LVD) in MA patients and to identify risk factors for adverse events (AEs).
Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed gastrointestinal cancer patients who underwent paracentesis between 2014 and 2023. Patients were categorized into SVD (<3,000 mL) and LVD (≥3,000 mL) groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of paracentesis-related AEs, including hypotension, infection, renal dysfunction, and hyponatremia. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for AEs.
Results: Among 89 eligible patients, 58 received SVD and 31 received LVD. The incidence of AEs was significantly higher in the LVD group compared to the SVD group (41.9% vs. 20.7%, P=0.04), particularly for hypotension (12.9% vs. 1.7%, P=0.04). In multivariate analysis, serum albumin <2.5 g/dL [odds ratio (OR) 3.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-9.64] and LVD (OR 3.45; 95% CI: 1.20-9.93) were identified as independent risk factors for AEs. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS; P=0.86) or the interval to subsequent paracentesis (P=0.21) between the groups.
Conclusions: Large-volume paracentesis was associated with a higher risk of AEs without additional efficacy in terms of symptom control. SVD appears to be a safer and equally effective option, especially for patients with low serum albumin. These findings support a conservative and individualized approach to fluid removal in patients with MA.
背景:恶性腹水(MA)穿刺的最佳引流量尚未确定,确定穿刺的危险因素可作为MA患者临床决定引流量的指导。因此,本研究的目的是比较MA患者小容量引流(SVD)与大容量引流(LVD)的安全性,并确定不良事件(ae)的危险因素。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究,分析2014年至2023年间接受穿刺术治疗的胃肠道肿瘤患者。结果:89例符合条件的患者中,58例接受SVD, 31例接受LVD。LVD组ae的发生率明显高于SVD组(41.9% vs. 20.7%, P=0.04),特别是低血压组(12.9% vs. 1.7%, P=0.04)。结论:在症状控制方面,大容量穿刺术与不良事件的高风险相关,但没有额外的疗效。SVD似乎是一种更安全、同样有效的选择,特别是对于低血清白蛋白的患者。这些发现支持对MA患者采用保守和个体化的液体清除方法。
期刊介绍:
Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.