Limitation on the Viewing Angles of Long GRBs Based on Amati Relation

Q4 Physics and Astronomy
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.chinastron.2026.06.005
Lin Yi-qing , Jiang Hua-li
{"title":"Limitation on the Viewing Angles of Long GRBs Based on Amati Relation","authors":"Lin Yi-qing ,&nbsp;Jiang Hua-li","doi":"10.1016/j.chinastron.2026.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fermi, Swift, and other observation satellites provided a dataset of 323 Long Gamma-Ray Bursts (LGRBs) with known redshift and well-defined spectral parameters spanning from February 1997 to September 2023. Among these, 123 GRBs (Gamma-Ray Bursts) observed by Fermi-GBM were selected to calibrate the relationship between the isotropic energy <span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>iso</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> and the peak energy in the cosmological rest frame <span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mo>,</mo><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></mrow></msub></math></span>, known as the Amati relation. The analysis revealed that the <span><math><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>iso</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> of five LGRBs (GRB 980425, GRB 061210, GRB 070714B, GRB 071227, and GRB 080123A) significantly deviated from the Amati relation, suggesting that the jet of them may be off-axis to the line of sight. Utilizing the well-established <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>iso</mi></mrow></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow><mo>,</mo><mrow><mi>i</mi></mrow></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> and Lorentz factor <span><math><mrow><mstyle><mi>Γ</mi></mstyle><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>E</mi><mrow><mi>iso</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> correlations, we estimated the viewing angles <span><math><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup></math></span> for these five LGRBs. The results show, <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msubsup><mn>42</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0.14</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.29</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 980425, <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msubsup><mn>27</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0.10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.21</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 061210, <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msubsup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0.02</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.09</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 070714B, <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msubsup><mn>13</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0.05</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.09</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 071227, and <span><math><mrow><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup><mo>=</mo><msup><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msubsup><mn>12</mn><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>0.03</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mn>0.14</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>)</mo></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 080123A. Notably, all five <span><math><msubsup><mi>θ</mi><mrow><mrow><mi>obs</mi></mrow></mrow><mo>′</mo></msubsup></math></span> values are small, with the maximum angle being <span><math><mrow><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><msup><mn>42</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span> for GRB 980425, the nearest long burst observed (<span><math><mrow><mi>z</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.0085</mn></mrow></math></span>). The results suggest that the majority of Long GRBs are likely detected on-axis, with only a small fraction of nearby Long GRBs being observed slightly outside the jet edge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35730,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","volume":"50 2","pages":"Pages 326-335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275106226000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fermi, Swift, and other observation satellites provided a dataset of 323 Long Gamma-Ray Bursts (LGRBs) with known redshift and well-defined spectral parameters spanning from February 1997 to September 2023. Among these, 123 GRBs (Gamma-Ray Bursts) observed by Fermi-GBM were selected to calibrate the relationship between the isotropic energy Eiso and the peak energy in the cosmological rest frame Ep,i, known as the Amati relation. The analysis revealed that the Eiso of five LGRBs (GRB 980425, GRB 061210, GRB 070714B, GRB 071227, and GRB 080123A) significantly deviated from the Amati relation, suggesting that the jet of them may be off-axis to the line of sight. Utilizing the well-established Eiso−Ep,i and Lorentz factor Γ−Eiso correlations, we estimated the viewing angles θobs′ for these five LGRBs. The results show, θobs′=(0.42−0.14+0.29)∘ for GRB 980425, θobs′=(0.27−0.10+0.21)∘ for GRB 061210, θobs′=(0.10−0.02+0.09)∘ for GRB 070714B, θobs′=(0.13−0.05+0.09)∘ for GRB 071227, and θobs′=(0.12−0.03+0.14)∘ for GRB 080123A. Notably, all five θobs′ values are small, with the maximum angle being 0.42∘ for GRB 980425, the nearest long burst observed (z=0.0085). The results suggest that the majority of Long GRBs are likely detected on-axis, with only a small fraction of nearby Long GRBs being observed slightly outside the jet edge.
基于Amati关系的长grb观测角度限制
费米、雨燕和其他观测卫星提供了从1997年2月到2023年9月的323个长伽马射线暴(lgrb)的数据集,这些数据具有已知的红移和明确的光谱参数。其中,选取Fermi-GBM观测到的123个伽玛射线暴(grb)来校准各向同性能量Eiso与宇宙学静止框架中峰值能量Ep,i之间的关系,称为Amati关系。分析表明,5个lgrb (GRB 980425、GRB 061210、GRB 070714B、GRB 071227和GRB 080123A)的Eiso明显偏离了Amati关系,表明它们的喷流可能偏离了视线。利用公认的Eiso−Ep,i和洛伦兹因子Γ−Eiso相关性,我们估计了这五个lgrb的视角θobs '。结果表明,GRB 980425的θobs′=(0.42−0.14+0.29)°,GRB 061210的θobs′=(0.27−0.10+0.21)°,GRB 070714B的θobs′=(0.10−0.02+0.09)°,GRB 071227的θobs′=(0.13−0.05+0.09)°,GRB 080123A的θobs′=(0.12−0.03+0.14)°。值得注意的是,所有5个θobs的值都很小,GRB 980425的最大角为0.42°,这是观测到的最近的长爆(z=0.0085)。结果表明,大多数长伽马射线暴可能是在轴上被探测到的,只有一小部分长伽马射线暴是在喷流边缘外被观测到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics
Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The vigorous growth of astronomical and astrophysical science in China led to an increase in papers on astrophysics which Acta Astronomica Sinica could no longer absorb. Translations of papers from two new journals the Chinese Journal of Space Science and Acta Astrophysica Sinica are added to the translation of Acta Astronomica Sinica to form the new journal Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics. Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics brings English translations of notable articles to astronomers and astrophysicists outside China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书