Characterizing Parental Use of a HIPAA-Compliant Large Language Model Chatbot in Rare Pediatric Diseases: Insights from Think-Aloud Sessions.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2888-9182
Anna M Kerr, Christine Bereitschaft, Stephanie Milam, James Rudloff, Melanie Bryan, Sally Cohen-Cutler, Min Zhao, Aditi Gupta, Albert M Lai, Bryan A Sisk
{"title":"Characterizing Parental Use of a HIPAA-Compliant Large Language Model Chatbot in Rare Pediatric Diseases: Insights from Think-Aloud Sessions.","authors":"Anna M Kerr, Christine Bereitschaft, Stephanie Milam, James Rudloff, Melanie Bryan, Sally Cohen-Cutler, Min Zhao, Aditi Gupta, Albert M Lai, Bryan A Sisk","doi":"10.1055/a-2888-9182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents of children with rare and serious illnesses often have unmet information needs. Large language models (LLMs) can help parents seek medical information. However, few studies have observed parents' use of LLMs or how they would use it in conjunction with their patient portal.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We provided parents of children with cancer or vascular anomalies (VAs) access to a secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant chatbot. We characterized how parents used the tool while accessing their child's patient portal and evaluated the chatbot responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Parents participated in think-aloud sessions (<i>n</i> = 48). Parents accessed a HIPAA-compliant GPT 4 Endpoint and entered queries about their child's illness. We examined query length and chatbot response length, accuracy, and readability. We also conducted content analysis on parent queries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 451 queries and 451 responses. Parents' queries ranged from 1 to 104 words. They entered primarily short well-formed questions or phrases/statements. Some entered single words or incomplete phrases. Content was related to diagnosis/etiology, treatment, symptoms/side effects, laboratory values, imaging results, clinician notes/documentation, and supportive resources, with some differences between VA and cancer contexts. Chatbot responses ranged from 9 to 883 words The mean accuracy rating was 4.9 ± 0.5 and the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 28.4 ± 15.0 (college-graduate level).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents' queries varied in length, complexity, and content, with some differences indicating unique information needs by disease context. Chatbot responses were accurate yet written at a reading level potentially challenging for some users. Future studies should consider these patterns and characteristics when designing health-related chatbot-based tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"459-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13286089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2888-9182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Parents of children with rare and serious illnesses often have unmet information needs. Large language models (LLMs) can help parents seek medical information. However, few studies have observed parents' use of LLMs or how they would use it in conjunction with their patient portal.

Objectives: We provided parents of children with cancer or vascular anomalies (VAs) access to a secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant chatbot. We characterized how parents used the tool while accessing their child's patient portal and evaluated the chatbot responses.

Methods: Parents participated in think-aloud sessions (n = 48). Parents accessed a HIPAA-compliant GPT 4 Endpoint and entered queries about their child's illness. We examined query length and chatbot response length, accuracy, and readability. We also conducted content analysis on parent queries.

Results: We analyzed 451 queries and 451 responses. Parents' queries ranged from 1 to 104 words. They entered primarily short well-formed questions or phrases/statements. Some entered single words or incomplete phrases. Content was related to diagnosis/etiology, treatment, symptoms/side effects, laboratory values, imaging results, clinician notes/documentation, and supportive resources, with some differences between VA and cancer contexts. Chatbot responses ranged from 9 to 883 words The mean accuracy rating was 4.9 ± 0.5 and the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 28.4 ± 15.0 (college-graduate level).

Conclusion: Parents' queries varied in length, complexity, and content, with some differences indicating unique information needs by disease context. Chatbot responses were accurate yet written at a reading level potentially challenging for some users. Future studies should consider these patterns and characteristics when designing health-related chatbot-based tools.

描述父母在罕见儿科疾病中使用符合hipaa的大型语言模型聊天机器人:来自有声思考会议的见解。
背景:患有罕见和严重疾病儿童的父母往往有未满足的信息需求。大语言模型(llm)可以帮助家长寻找医疗信息。然而,很少有研究观察到父母使用llm或他们如何将其与患者门户网站结合使用。目的:我们为患有癌症或血管异常(VAs)儿童的父母提供了一个安全的符合hipaa的聊天机器人。我们描述了父母在访问孩子的病人门户网站时如何使用该工具,并评估了聊天机器人的反应。方法:家长参与“出声思考”(n=48)。家长访问符合hipaa的GPT 4 Endpoint,输入关于孩子疾病的查询。我们检查了查询长度和聊天机器人响应长度、准确性和可读性。我们还对家长查询进行了内容分析。结果:我们分析了451个查询和451个回复。家长们的问题从1个到104个单词不等。他们主要输入格式良好的简短问题或短语/陈述句。有些人输入的是单个单词或不完整的短语。内容涉及诊断/病因、治疗、症状/副作用、实验室值、影像学结果、临床医生笔记/文件和支持资源,在VA和癌症背景之间存在一些差异。聊天机器人的回答从9到883个单词不等,平均准确率为4.9±0.5,平均Flesch Reading Ease得分为28.4±15.0(大学毕业生水平)。结论:家长问询的长度、复杂性和内容各不相同,其中一些差异表明疾病背景对信息的需求不同。聊天机器人的回答是准确的,但写在阅读水平上,对一些用户来说可能是一个挑战。未来的研究应该在设计与健康相关的聊天机器人工具时考虑这些模式和特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书