Margin-driven outcomes prevail over resection planes: multivisceral surgery matches total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer.

IF 2.2 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.3393/ac.2025.00920.0131
Niyaz Shadmanov, Baris Bakir, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
{"title":"Margin-driven outcomes prevail over resection planes: multivisceral surgery matches total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer.","authors":"Niyaz Shadmanov, Baris Bakir, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu","doi":"10.3393/ac.2025.00920.0131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared oncologic and perioperative outcomes between patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) and those with pathologic stage III disease undergoing TME.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using prospectively collected data from 580 LARC patients treated with curative-intent surgery over a 23-year period. Patients were categorized as those with clinical T4b tumors who underwent bTME with multivisceral resection (MVR) and those with pathologic stage III tumors treated with TME. Demographic, surgical, pathological, and oncologic outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity was similar between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.6%, P=0.467). Postoperative complications occurred more often in the bTME group (28.9% vs. 16.6%, P=0.004), although major complications were comparable (P=0.812). Five-year local recurrence (10.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.371), distant metastasis (19.7% vs. 21.4%, P=0.140), disease-free survival (64.4% vs. 66.2%, P=0.326), and overall survival (74.8% vs. 75.5%, P=0.464) demonstrated no significant differences. Within the bTME group, 32 patients (42.1%) underwent major MVR and 44 (57.9%) underwent minor MVR. CRM positivity (6.2% vs. 4.5%, P=0.999), local recurrence (12.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.714), and distant metastasis (25.0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.388) rates were similar. Five-year disease-free survival (61.5% vs. 72.3%, P=0.454) and overall survival (68.5% vs. 74.8%, P=0.609) favored minor MVR, although the differences were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When negative circumferential margins are achieved, margin-driven bTME resections provide long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to standard TME in high-risk rectal cancer, although they are associated with higher overall complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8267,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Coloproctology","volume":"42 2","pages":"226-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13254773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00920.0131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared oncologic and perioperative outcomes between patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with beyond total mesorectal excision (bTME) and those with pathologic stage III disease undergoing TME.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using prospectively collected data from 580 LARC patients treated with curative-intent surgery over a 23-year period. Patients were categorized as those with clinical T4b tumors who underwent bTME with multivisceral resection (MVR) and those with pathologic stage III tumors treated with TME. Demographic, surgical, pathological, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results: Circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity was similar between the groups (5.3% vs. 3.6%, P=0.467). Postoperative complications occurred more often in the bTME group (28.9% vs. 16.6%, P=0.004), although major complications were comparable (P=0.812). Five-year local recurrence (10.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.371), distant metastasis (19.7% vs. 21.4%, P=0.140), disease-free survival (64.4% vs. 66.2%, P=0.326), and overall survival (74.8% vs. 75.5%, P=0.464) demonstrated no significant differences. Within the bTME group, 32 patients (42.1%) underwent major MVR and 44 (57.9%) underwent minor MVR. CRM positivity (6.2% vs. 4.5%, P=0.999), local recurrence (12.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.714), and distant metastasis (25.0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.388) rates were similar. Five-year disease-free survival (61.5% vs. 72.3%, P=0.454) and overall survival (68.5% vs. 74.8%, P=0.609) favored minor MVR, although the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: When negative circumferential margins are achieved, margin-driven bTME resections provide long-term oncologic outcomes comparable to standard TME in high-risk rectal cancer, although they are associated with higher overall complication rates.

边缘驱动的结果优于切除平面:多内脏手术与局部晚期直肠癌全肠系膜切除术相匹配。
目的:本研究比较局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)行全肠系膜切除术(bTME)和病理性III期直肠癌行全肠系膜切除术(TME)患者的肿瘤和围手术期预后。方法:回顾性分析了23年来580例LARC患者接受治疗目的手术治疗的前瞻性数据。患者分为临床T4b肿瘤患者接受bTME联合多脏器切除(MVR)和病理性III期肿瘤患者接受TME治疗。比较人口统计学、外科、病理和肿瘤预后。结果:两组患者环切缘(CRM)阳性率相近(5.3% vs. 3.6%, P=0.467)。bTME组术后并发症发生率更高(28.9% vs. 16.6%, P=0.004),但主要并发症具有可比性(P=0.812)。5年局部复发(10.5% vs. 9.3%, P=0.371)、远处转移(19.7% vs. 21.4%, P=0.140)、无病生存(64.4% vs. 66.2%, P=0.326)、总生存(74.8% vs. 75.5%, P=0.464)差异无统计学意义。在bTME组中,32例(42.1%)患者发生重度MVR, 44例(57.9%)患者发生轻度MVR。CRM阳性(6.2%比4.5%,P=0.999)、局部复发率(12.5%比9.1%,P=0.714)、远处转移率(25.0%比15.9%,P=0.388)相似。5年无病生存率(61.5%比72.3%,P=0.454)和总生存率(68.5%比74.8%,P=0.609)倾向于轻微MVR,但差异无统计学意义。结论:当周缘阴性时,边缘驱动的bTME切除术在高危直肠癌中提供了与标准TME相当的长期肿瘤预后,尽管它们与更高的总并发症发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书