{"title":"Classification of glucose profile in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes and its association with complications.","authors":"Takafumi Masuda, Naoto Katakami, Naohiro Taya, Kazuyuki Miyashita, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Ken Kato, Iichiro Shimomura","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgag224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The importance of utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to optimize glycemic profiles and thereby prevent the onset of diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes has been increasingly recognized. Nevertheless, studies evaluating the risk of diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes through machine learning approaches based on CGM data remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To classify the glycemic profiles of Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes using a data-driven cluster analysis based on CGM and clarify the association between these clusters and diabetic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, a cluster analysis using glycemic metrics from CGM of 153 Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes was performed. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and duration of diabetes was performed to compare the risk of diabetic complications by cluster.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified four clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 53) exhibited an optimal glycemic profile. Cluster 2 (n = 46) demonstrated an extended duration of hyperglycemia and a higher risk of elevated brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity than Cluster 1. Cluster 3 (n = 39) demonstrated an extended duration of hypoglycemia and a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia than Cluster 1. Cluster 4 (n = 15) demonstrated large glycemic variability associated with hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Cluster 4 had higher risks of polyneuropathy, elevated brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and higher cardiovascular disease risk scores than Cluster 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-risk diabetic complications were identified for each cluster classified by glycemic profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"3085-3093"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13671772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgag224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: The importance of utilizing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to optimize glycemic profiles and thereby prevent the onset of diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes has been increasingly recognized. Nevertheless, studies evaluating the risk of diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes through machine learning approaches based on CGM data remain limited.
Objective: To classify the glycemic profiles of Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes using a data-driven cluster analysis based on CGM and clarify the association between these clusters and diabetic complications.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a cluster analysis using glycemic metrics from CGM of 153 Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes was performed. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and duration of diabetes was performed to compare the risk of diabetic complications by cluster.
Results: The cluster analysis identified four clusters. Cluster 1 (n = 53) exhibited an optimal glycemic profile. Cluster 2 (n = 46) demonstrated an extended duration of hyperglycemia and a higher risk of elevated brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity than Cluster 1. Cluster 3 (n = 39) demonstrated an extended duration of hypoglycemia and a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia than Cluster 1. Cluster 4 (n = 15) demonstrated large glycemic variability associated with hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Cluster 4 had higher risks of polyneuropathy, elevated brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and higher cardiovascular disease risk scores than Cluster 1.
Conclusion: High-risk diabetic complications were identified for each cluster classified by glycemic profile.