The role of early venous duplex screening in improving patient safety indicator-12 (PSI-12) classification accuracy: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.3 Q1 SURGERY
Adam S Surti, Robert T Matthews, Oana Popescu, Malak Bentaleb, Rodrigo F Alban
{"title":"The role of early venous duplex screening in improving patient safety indicator-12 (PSI-12) classification accuracy: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Adam S Surti, Robert T Matthews, Oana Popescu, Malak Bentaleb, Rodrigo F Alban","doi":"10.1186/s13037-026-00489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity among surgical patients. Patient Safety Indicator 12 (PSI-12) identifies perioperative VTE events. This study evaluates whether early admission duplex ultrasound identifies VTEs associated with PSI-12 coding and assesses PSI-12 classification accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on surgical patients with a venous duplex ultrasound within 48 h of admission at a large academic medical center (2013-2024). Two cohorts were analyzed: (1) all surgical patients with early duplex imaging, (2) PSI-12 positive elective surgical patients with early duplex imaging. The primary outcome was the prevalence of pre-existing DVT identified within 48 h among PSI-12 positive patients. Diagnostic accuracy of early abnormal duplex findings for predicting PSI-12 classification was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all 10,498 surgical patients, 10.6% had positive duplex findings for DVT. PSI-12 positive patients had double the prevalence compared to PSI-12 negatives (20.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001). In PSI-12 positive elective cases, 10.7% of preoperative duplex studies identified a DVT. Misclassification, defined as PSI-12 positive admissions without imaging-confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism, occurred in 8.7% of elective cases. Overall, 36.7% of PSI-12 positive patients had abnormal early duplex findings. Early duplex demonstrated limited sensitivity but high specificity (sensitivity 36.7%, specificity 81.7%, PPV 3.7%, NPV 98.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest possible pre-existing disease rather than hospital-acquired VTE in PSI-12 positive patients. Incorporating admission duplex studies could improve PSI-12 classification accuracy, reduce costs, and enhance patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13488569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-026-00489-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity among surgical patients. Patient Safety Indicator 12 (PSI-12) identifies perioperative VTE events. This study evaluates whether early admission duplex ultrasound identifies VTEs associated with PSI-12 coding and assesses PSI-12 classification accuracy.

Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on surgical patients with a venous duplex ultrasound within 48 h of admission at a large academic medical center (2013-2024). Two cohorts were analyzed: (1) all surgical patients with early duplex imaging, (2) PSI-12 positive elective surgical patients with early duplex imaging. The primary outcome was the prevalence of pre-existing DVT identified within 48 h among PSI-12 positive patients. Diagnostic accuracy of early abnormal duplex findings for predicting PSI-12 classification was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results: Among all 10,498 surgical patients, 10.6% had positive duplex findings for DVT. PSI-12 positive patients had double the prevalence compared to PSI-12 negatives (20.9% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.001). In PSI-12 positive elective cases, 10.7% of preoperative duplex studies identified a DVT. Misclassification, defined as PSI-12 positive admissions without imaging-confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism, occurred in 8.7% of elective cases. Overall, 36.7% of PSI-12 positive patients had abnormal early duplex findings. Early duplex demonstrated limited sensitivity but high specificity (sensitivity 36.7%, specificity 81.7%, PPV 3.7%, NPV 98.5%).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest possible pre-existing disease rather than hospital-acquired VTE in PSI-12 positive patients. Incorporating admission duplex studies could improve PSI-12 classification accuracy, reduce costs, and enhance patient safety.

早期静脉双相筛查在提高患者安全指标-12 (PSI-12)分类准确性中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是外科患者发病的主要原因。患者安全指标12 (PSI-12)用于识别围手术期静脉血栓栓塞事件。本研究评估了早期入院双工超声是否能识别与PSI-12编码相关的静脉血栓栓塞,并评估了PSI-12分类的准确性。方法:对某大型学术医疗中心2013-2024年住院48 h内静脉双工超声手术患者进行单中心回顾性分析。分析两组队列:(1)所有早期双相成像的手术患者,(2)早期双相成像的PSI-12阳性选择性手术患者。主要结果是PSI-12阳性患者在48小时内确定的已有DVT的患病率。通过敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)评估早期异常双相发现预测PSI-12分类的诊断准确性。结果:在10498例手术患者中,10.6%有DVT双相阳性。PSI-12阳性患者的患病率是PSI-12阴性患者的两倍(20.9% vs. 10.4%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,PSI-12阳性患者可能存在疾病,而不是医院获得性静脉血栓栓塞。纳入住院双重研究可以提高PSI-12分类的准确性,降低成本并提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书