The effects of lymph node dissection techniques on survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-09 DOI:10.1177/02184923261456799
Esra Yamansavcı Şirzai, Gizem Özçıbık Işık, Oğuzhan Bayraktar, Celal Buğra Sezen, Özkan Saydam, Ahmet Üçvet
{"title":"The effects of lymph node dissection techniques on survival in stage I non-small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Esra Yamansavcı Şirzai, Gizem Özçıbık Işık, Oğuzhan Bayraktar, Celal Buğra Sezen, Özkan Saydam, Ahmet Üçvet","doi":"10.1177/02184923261456799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of lymph node dissection technique on survival outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsA total of 442 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at multiple centers between 2011 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the lymph node dissection technique: lobe-specific lymph node dissection and systematic lymph node dissection. Survival outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.ResultsPostoperative complications occurred in 86 patients (19.5%). Complications were significantly less frequent in the lobe-specific lymph node dissection group compared to the systematic lymph node dissection group (9.4% vs. 22.4%, respectively; p = 0.027). The overall annual survival rate was 68.3%. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (83.6% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 69.3% in patients who underwent systematic lymph node dissection and 64.8% in those who underwent lobe-specific lymph node dissection, with no statistically significant difference between the two techniques (p = 0.332). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, advanced age was not a significant predictor of survival (p = 0.119, HR = 0.714, 95% CI: 0.467-1.090), whereas male gender was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor (p = 0.01, HR = 2.781, 95% CI: 1.506-5.138).ConclusionsLymph node dissection remains a critical component of surgical treatment in early-stage lung cancer. The comparable survival outcomes and lower complication rates observed with lobe-specific lymph node dissection suggest that it may be a preferable option in selected patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Nevertheless, prospective multicenter studies are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":35950,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","volume":" ","pages":"535-541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923261456799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of lymph node dissection technique on survival outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.MethodsA total of 442 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection at multiple centers between 2011 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the lymph node dissection technique: lobe-specific lymph node dissection and systematic lymph node dissection. Survival outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors affecting survival.ResultsPostoperative complications occurred in 86 patients (19.5%). Complications were significantly less frequent in the lobe-specific lymph node dissection group compared to the systematic lymph node dissection group (9.4% vs. 22.4%, respectively; p = 0.027). The overall annual survival rate was 68.3%. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (83.6% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 69.3% in patients who underwent systematic lymph node dissection and 64.8% in those who underwent lobe-specific lymph node dissection, with no statistically significant difference between the two techniques (p = 0.332). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, advanced age was not a significant predictor of survival (p = 0.119, HR = 0.714, 95% CI: 0.467-1.090), whereas male gender was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor (p = 0.01, HR = 2.781, 95% CI: 1.506-5.138).ConclusionsLymph node dissection remains a critical component of surgical treatment in early-stage lung cancer. The comparable survival outcomes and lower complication rates observed with lobe-specific lymph node dissection suggest that it may be a preferable option in selected patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Nevertheless, prospective multicenter studies are required to confirm these findings.

淋巴结清扫技术对I期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响。
本研究旨在评估淋巴结清扫技术对临床I期非小细胞肺癌手术患者生存结局的影响。方法回顾性分析2011 ~ 2022年在多中心行手术切除的442例I期非小细胞肺癌患者。根据淋巴结清扫技术将患者分为两组:肺叶特异性淋巴结清扫和系统性淋巴结清扫。比较两组患者的生存情况和术后并发症。多因素Cox回归分析确定影响生存的预后因素。结果术后并发症86例(19.5%)。分叶淋巴结清扫组并发症发生率明显低于系统性淋巴结清扫组(分别为9.4%和22.4%,p = 0.027)。总年生存率为68.3%。女性患者的5年生存率明显高于男性患者(83.6% vs. 61.7%, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals is an international peer-reviewed journal pertaining to cardiovascular and thoracic medicine. Besides original clinical manuscripts, we welcome research reports, product reviews, reports of new techniques, and findings of special significance to Asia and the Pacific Rim. Case studies that have significant novel original observations, are instructive, include adequate methodological details and provide conclusions. Workshop proceedings, meetings and book reviews, letters to the editor, and meeting announcements are encouraged along with relevant articles from authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书