Robert Hill, Akish Luintel, Ernest Mutengesa, Douglas L Fink
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Anti-interferon Auto-antibodies in Infectious Diseases.","authors":"Robert Hill, Akish Luintel, Ernest Mutengesa, Douglas L Fink","doi":"10.1007/s10875-026-02038-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and function of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a search on the following electronic bibliographic databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane. Eligible studies generated a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis of pooled seroprevalence and neutralisation status of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies including 12,629 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed. There are insufficient data for meta-analyses of auto-antibodies in non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases, with crude seroprevalence of auto-antibodies varying widely (0.0-77.0%). The pooled seroprevalence of anti-IFNɑ and/or anti-IFN⍵ auto-antibodies in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14% (95%CI 9-18%, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0151, p < 0.01). Pooled prevalence of neutralising auto-antibodies were slightly lower (12%; 95%CI 8-17%, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0027, p < 0.01). The high heterogeneity may reflect divergent SARS-CoV-2 disease severity across studies, and methodological diversity for measurement and definition of auto-antibody binding and neutralisation. Pooled seroprevalence for anti-IFNɑ auto-antibodies in uninfected healthy controls were < 1% (95%CI 0-1%, I<sup>2</sup> = 90%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0028, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-interferon auto-antibodies may impair immune responses to diverse infections leading to life-threatening disease. These auto-antibodies have not been studied at all in most infectious diseases, most notably for bacterial infection. This study illustrates the urgent need to standardise methodology and reporting of auto-antibodies in the setting of infectious diseases so that the immunopathology and translational impact of these novel biomarkers can be realised.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-026-02038-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and function of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.
Methods: We performed a search on the following electronic bibliographic databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane. Eligible studies generated a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis of pooled seroprevalence and neutralisation status of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.
Results: Thirty-seven studies including 12,629 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed. There are insufficient data for meta-analyses of auto-antibodies in non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases, with crude seroprevalence of auto-antibodies varying widely (0.0-77.0%). The pooled seroprevalence of anti-IFNɑ and/or anti-IFN⍵ auto-antibodies in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14% (95%CI 9-18%, I2 = 92%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0151, p < 0.01). Pooled prevalence of neutralising auto-antibodies were slightly lower (12%; 95%CI 8-17%, I2 = 77%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0027, p < 0.01). The high heterogeneity may reflect divergent SARS-CoV-2 disease severity across studies, and methodological diversity for measurement and definition of auto-antibody binding and neutralisation. Pooled seroprevalence for anti-IFNɑ auto-antibodies in uninfected healthy controls were < 1% (95%CI 0-1%, I2 = 90%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0028, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Anti-interferon auto-antibodies may impair immune responses to diverse infections leading to life-threatening disease. These auto-antibodies have not been studied at all in most infectious diseases, most notably for bacterial infection. This study illustrates the urgent need to standardise methodology and reporting of auto-antibodies in the setting of infectious diseases so that the immunopathology and translational impact of these novel biomarkers can be realised.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.