Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Anti-interferon Auto-antibodies in Infectious Diseases.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Robert Hill, Akish Luintel, Ernest Mutengesa, Douglas L Fink
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Anti-interferon Auto-antibodies in Infectious Diseases.","authors":"Robert Hill, Akish Luintel, Ernest Mutengesa, Douglas L Fink","doi":"10.1007/s10875-026-02038-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and function of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a search on the following electronic bibliographic databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane. Eligible studies generated a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis of pooled seroprevalence and neutralisation status of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies including 12,629 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed. There are insufficient data for meta-analyses of auto-antibodies in non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases, with crude seroprevalence of auto-antibodies varying widely (0.0-77.0%). The pooled seroprevalence of anti-IFNɑ and/or anti-IFN⍵ auto-antibodies in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14% (95%CI 9-18%, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0151, p < 0.01). Pooled prevalence of neutralising auto-antibodies were slightly lower (12%; 95%CI 8-17%, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0027, p < 0.01). The high heterogeneity may reflect divergent SARS-CoV-2 disease severity across studies, and methodological diversity for measurement and definition of auto-antibody binding and neutralisation. Pooled seroprevalence for anti-IFNɑ auto-antibodies in uninfected healthy controls were < 1% (95%CI 0-1%, I<sup>2</sup> = 90%, [Formula: see text]<sup>2</sup> = 0.0028, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-interferon auto-antibodies may impair immune responses to diverse infections leading to life-threatening disease. These auto-antibodies have not been studied at all in most infectious diseases, most notably for bacterial infection. This study illustrates the urgent need to standardise methodology and reporting of auto-antibodies in the setting of infectious diseases so that the immunopathology and translational impact of these novel biomarkers can be realised.</p>","PeriodicalId":15531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13473239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-026-02038-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and function of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.

Methods: We performed a search on the following electronic bibliographic databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane. Eligible studies generated a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis of pooled seroprevalence and neutralisation status of anti-interferon auto-antibodies in acute infectious diseases.

Results: Thirty-seven studies including 12,629 individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed. There are insufficient data for meta-analyses of auto-antibodies in non-SARS-CoV-2 infectious diseases, with crude seroprevalence of auto-antibodies varying widely (0.0-77.0%). The pooled seroprevalence of anti-IFNɑ and/or anti-IFN⍵ auto-antibodies in individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 14% (95%CI 9-18%, I2 = 92%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0151, p < 0.01). Pooled prevalence of neutralising auto-antibodies were slightly lower (12%; 95%CI 8-17%, I2 = 77%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0027, p < 0.01). The high heterogeneity may reflect divergent SARS-CoV-2 disease severity across studies, and methodological diversity for measurement and definition of auto-antibody binding and neutralisation. Pooled seroprevalence for anti-IFNɑ auto-antibodies in uninfected healthy controls were < 1% (95%CI 0-1%, I2 = 90%, [Formula: see text]2 = 0.0028, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Anti-interferon auto-antibodies may impair immune responses to diverse infections leading to life-threatening disease. These auto-antibodies have not been studied at all in most infectious diseases, most notably for bacterial infection. This study illustrates the urgent need to standardise methodology and reporting of auto-antibodies in the setting of infectious diseases so that the immunopathology and translational impact of these novel biomarkers can be realised.

感染性疾病中抗干扰素自身抗体的系统评价和meta分析。
目的:对急性感染性疾病中抗干扰素自身抗体的流行和功能进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:对Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane等电子书目数据库进行检索。符合条件的研究对急性感染性疾病中抗干扰素自身抗体的血清阳性率和中和状态进行了系统评价和随机效应模型荟萃分析。结果:分析了37项研究,包括12,629例SARS-CoV-2感染。自身抗体在非sars - cov -2传染病中的meta分析数据不足,自身抗体的粗血清阳性率差异很大(0.0% -77.0%)。SARS-CoV-2感染个体血清中抗干扰素因子和/或抗干扰素自身抗体的总阳性率为14% (95%CI 9-18%, I2 = 92%,[公式:见文]2 = 0.0151,p 2 = 77%,[公式:见文]2 = 0.0027,p 2 = 90%,[公式:见文]2 = 0.0028,p)结论:抗干扰素自身抗体可损害机体对多种感染的免疫反应,从而导致危及生命的疾病。这些自身抗体在大多数传染病,尤其是细菌感染中还没有被研究过。这项研究表明,在传染病的背景下,迫切需要标准化自身抗体的方法和报告,以便实现这些新的生物标志物的免疫病理学和转化影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
9.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Immunology publishes impactful papers in the realm of human immunology, delving into the diagnosis, pathogenesis, prognosis, or treatment of human diseases. The journal places particular emphasis on primary immunodeficiencies and related diseases, encompassing inborn errors of immunity in a broad sense, their underlying genotypes, and diverse phenotypes. These phenotypes include infection, malignancy, allergy, auto-inflammation, and autoimmunity. We welcome a broad spectrum of studies in this domain, spanning genetic discovery, clinical description, immunologic assessment, diagnostic approaches, prognosis evaluation, and treatment interventions. Case reports are considered if they are genuinely original and accompanied by a concise review of the relevant medical literature, illustrating how the novel case study advances the field. The instructions to authors provide detailed guidance on the four categories of papers accepted by the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书