Utility of slow conduction velocity area guided ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

IF 2.6
Yousaku Okubo, Shunsuke Ishida, Sho Okamura, Naoki Ishibashi, Oe Hiroshi, Junji Maeda, Takumi Sakai, Naoto Oguri, Motoki Furutani, Shogo Miyamoto, Shunsuke Miyauchi, Takehito Tokuyama, Noboru Oda, Yukiko Nakano
{"title":"Utility of slow conduction velocity area guided ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Yousaku Okubo, Shunsuke Ishida, Sho Okamura, Naoki Ishibashi, Oe Hiroshi, Junji Maeda, Takumi Sakai, Naoto Oguri, Motoki Furutani, Shogo Miyamoto, Shunsuke Miyauchi, Takehito Tokuyama, Noboru Oda, Yukiko Nakano","doi":"10.1007/s10840-026-02368-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with persistent AF, PVI alone is often insufficient, and no adjunctive strategy with proven efficacy beyond PVI has been established. Recently, increasing attention has been directed toward local atrial conduction velocity (CV). Slow conduction velocity areas (SCVAs) have been regarded as potential arrhythmogenic substrates, and ablation strategies targeting SCVAs are under investigation. This study evaluated the efficacy of SCVA-guided ablation in patients with persistent AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 175 patients with persistent AF who underwent initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). SCVAs were defined as contiguous atrial regions with a local CV < 0.7 m/s and a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm². SCVA-guided ablation was performed in 84 patients, whereas standard anatomical PVI was performed in 91 patients. The primary outcome was recurrence of AF or occurrence of new-onset supraventricular tachycardia during a two-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, clinical recurrence occurred in 63 patients (36.0%). Patients in the SCVA-guided ablation group demonstrated a significantly higher recurrence-free survival rate compared with those in the standard PVI group (72.6% vs. 56.1%; log-rank P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified SCVA-guided ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.67, P = 0.003) and left atrial (LA) volume index (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.001) as independent predictors of AF recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCVAs represent important arrhythmogenic substrates. Incorporating these regions into PVI significantly reduced AF recurrence compared with standard anatomical PVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":"1987-1995"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13687391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-026-02368-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, in patients with persistent AF, PVI alone is often insufficient, and no adjunctive strategy with proven efficacy beyond PVI has been established. Recently, increasing attention has been directed toward local atrial conduction velocity (CV). Slow conduction velocity areas (SCVAs) have been regarded as potential arrhythmogenic substrates, and ablation strategies targeting SCVAs are under investigation. This study evaluated the efficacy of SCVA-guided ablation in patients with persistent AF.

Methods: We enrolled 175 patients with persistent AF who underwent initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). SCVAs were defined as contiguous atrial regions with a local CV < 0.7 m/s and a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm². SCVA-guided ablation was performed in 84 patients, whereas standard anatomical PVI was performed in 91 patients. The primary outcome was recurrence of AF or occurrence of new-onset supraventricular tachycardia during a two-year follow-up period.

Results: During follow-up, clinical recurrence occurred in 63 patients (36.0%). Patients in the SCVA-guided ablation group demonstrated a significantly higher recurrence-free survival rate compared with those in the standard PVI group (72.6% vs. 56.1%; log-rank P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified SCVA-guided ablation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21-0.67, P = 0.003) and left atrial (LA) volume index (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.001) as independent predictors of AF recurrence.

Conclusion: SCVAs represent important arrhythmogenic substrates. Incorporating these regions into PVI significantly reduced AF recurrence compared with standard anatomical PVI.

慢传导速度区引导消融在持续性房颤患者中的应用。
背景:肺静脉隔离(PVI)是一种公认的治疗心房颤动(AF)的方法。然而,对于持续性房颤患者,单靠PVI治疗往往是不够的,除了PVI治疗外,还没有证实有效的辅助治疗策略。近年来,局部心房传导速度(CV)的研究受到越来越多的关注。慢传导速度区(SCVAs)被认为是潜在的心律失常底物,针对SCVAs的消融策略正在研究中。本研究评估了scva引导消融治疗持续性房颤的疗效。方法:我们招募了175例接受初始射频导管消融(RFCA)治疗的持续性房颤患者。SCVAs被定义为具有局部CV的连续心房区域。结果:在随访期间,63例患者(36.0%)出现临床复发。scva引导下消融组患者的无复发生存率明显高于标准PVI组(72.6% vs. 56.1%; log-rank P = 0.01)。多因素分析发现scva引导消融(风险比[HR] 0.31, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.21-0.67, P = 0.003)和左房容积指数(HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.001)是房颤复发的独立预测因子。结论:SCVAs是重要的致心律失常底物。与标准解剖PVI相比,将这些区域纳入PVI可显著减少房颤复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书