Moving on from patient safety incidents: a qualitative study exploring GP perspectives in England.

IF 5.2
James Tawse, Christopher J Armitage, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Maria Panagioti
{"title":"Moving on from patient safety incidents: a qualitative study exploring GP perspectives in England.","authors":"James Tawse, Christopher J Armitage, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Maria Panagioti","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2026.0190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient safety incidents (PSIs), defined as unintended or unexpected events that could have or did lead to patient harm, can have profound effects on GPs. Understanding how GPs experience and recover from PSIs is important for workforce wellbeing and patient safety in primary care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how GPs experience PSIs, how they move on, and how they use available support.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study with GPs in England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were eligible if they had been involved in a PSI in general practice, spanning near misses to events resulting in patient harm. Themes were developed inductively and mapped onto the theoretical domains framework to identify cognitive, social, and environmental influences on learning, help seeking, and recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: personal and professional consequences; recovery and learning processes; and barriers to healing. GPs described emotional responses, including guilt, self-doubt, and fear of reputational or regulatory consequences. Peer support was valued, but access to structured support was limited. Formal investigations were experienced as distressing and compounded the emotional impact. Recovery and learning were facilitated by empathetic, systems-focused cultures, protected time for reflection, and structured opportunities to learn from incidents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs rely on informal and self-directed strategies to recover from PSIs, with variable access to formal support. Recovery is shaped by individual and organisational factors. Findings highlight the importance of compassionate, non-punitive support systems and psychologically safe environments to enable recovery and promote learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2026.0190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient safety incidents (PSIs), defined as unintended or unexpected events that could have or did lead to patient harm, can have profound effects on GPs. Understanding how GPs experience and recover from PSIs is important for workforce wellbeing and patient safety in primary care.

Aim: To explore how GPs experience PSIs, how they move on, and how they use available support.

Design and setting: Qualitative study with GPs in England.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Participants were eligible if they had been involved in a PSI in general practice, spanning near misses to events resulting in patient harm. Themes were developed inductively and mapped onto the theoretical domains framework to identify cognitive, social, and environmental influences on learning, help seeking, and recovery.

Results: Three themes were generated: personal and professional consequences; recovery and learning processes; and barriers to healing. GPs described emotional responses, including guilt, self-doubt, and fear of reputational or regulatory consequences. Peer support was valued, but access to structured support was limited. Formal investigations were experienced as distressing and compounded the emotional impact. Recovery and learning were facilitated by empathetic, systems-focused cultures, protected time for reflection, and structured opportunities to learn from incidents.

Conclusion: GPs rely on informal and self-directed strategies to recover from PSIs, with variable access to formal support. Recovery is shaped by individual and organisational factors. Findings highlight the importance of compassionate, non-punitive support systems and psychologically safe environments to enable recovery and promote learning.

从患者安全事件继续:一项探索GP观点的定性研究在英格兰。
背景:患者安全事件(PSIs)被定义为可能或确实导致患者伤害的意外或意外事件,可能对全科医生(gp)产生深远影响。了解全科医生如何经历并从psi中恢复,对于初级保健的员工福利和患者安全非常重要。目的:探讨全科医生如何体验心理咨询服务,他们如何继续前进,以及他们如何利用现有的支持。设计与设置:与英国gp的定性研究。方法:对22名全科医生进行半结构式访谈。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。如果参与者在一般实践中参与过PSI,从险些失误到导致患者伤害的事件,他们就有资格。主题被归纳发展并映射到理论领域框架(TDF),以确定认知、社会和环境对学习、寻求帮助和康复的影响。结果:产生了三个主题:个人和职业后果,恢复和学习过程,以及治疗障碍。全科医生描述了情绪反应,包括内疚、自我怀疑以及对声誉或监管后果的恐惧。同伴支持很有价值,但获得结构性支持的机会有限。正式的调查经历了痛苦和复杂的情感影响。同理心、以系统为中心的文化、有保障的反思时间以及从事件中学习的结构化机会,促进了恢复和学习。结论:全科医生依靠非正式和自我导向的策略从psi中恢复,获得正式支持的机会不同。恢复是由个人和组织因素决定的。研究结果强调了富有同情心、非惩罚性的支持系统和心理安全环境对促进康复和促进学习的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书