Allocation and prioritization of hospital pharmacist clinical services in British Columbia.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-10-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i3.6536
Karen Dahri, Louise Lau, Michael Legal, Sean P Spina, Sean K Gorman
{"title":"Allocation and prioritization of hospital pharmacist clinical services in British Columbia.","authors":"Karen Dahri, Louise Lau, Michael Legal, Sean P Spina, Sean K Gorman","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i3.6536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Clinical pharmacists are a limited resource in British Columbia (BC). Few studies have been conducted to explore hospital clinical pharmacist allocation. It is unclear how pharmacy leaders prioritize the allocation of their pharmacist staff to provide clinical services at their sites. <b>Objectives</b>: To characterize how hospital pharmacy leaders allocate their pharmacists within their sites. <b>Methods</b>: This qualitative study used key informant interviews of hospital pharmacy leaders in BC, Canada. Seven questions were included in the interview guide, asking participants about their philosophy for organizing clinical pharmacist coverage, exploring the adequacy of current staff levels, asking about barriers and enablers, and looking at the use of quality assurance mechanisms. <b>Results</b>: Sixteen participants were interviewed. The data yielded five themes: clinical staff allocation, barriers to providing optimal pharmacy services, clinical work prioritization, staff training and recruitment, and quality assurance. <b>Conclusions</b>: Pharmacy leaders in BC consider a variety of factors in allocating their clinical staff. While funding is an important factor in human resource allocation, even with adequate funding, there is a lack of adequately trained staff to fill available positions. Future exploration is needed to determine the best method of pharmacist allocation in relation to patient outcomes and to identify novel ways to support training of clinical pharmacists.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i3.6536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical pharmacists are a limited resource in British Columbia (BC). Few studies have been conducted to explore hospital clinical pharmacist allocation. It is unclear how pharmacy leaders prioritize the allocation of their pharmacist staff to provide clinical services at their sites. Objectives: To characterize how hospital pharmacy leaders allocate their pharmacists within their sites. Methods: This qualitative study used key informant interviews of hospital pharmacy leaders in BC, Canada. Seven questions were included in the interview guide, asking participants about their philosophy for organizing clinical pharmacist coverage, exploring the adequacy of current staff levels, asking about barriers and enablers, and looking at the use of quality assurance mechanisms. Results: Sixteen participants were interviewed. The data yielded five themes: clinical staff allocation, barriers to providing optimal pharmacy services, clinical work prioritization, staff training and recruitment, and quality assurance. Conclusions: Pharmacy leaders in BC consider a variety of factors in allocating their clinical staff. While funding is an important factor in human resource allocation, even with adequate funding, there is a lack of adequately trained staff to fill available positions. Future exploration is needed to determine the best method of pharmacist allocation in relation to patient outcomes and to identify novel ways to support training of clinical pharmacists.

不列颠哥伦比亚省医院药剂师临床服务的分配和优先次序。
背景:临床药师是不列颠哥伦比亚省有限的资源。关于医院临床药师配置的研究较少。目前尚不清楚药房领导如何优先分配他们的药剂师人员在他们的网站提供临床服务。目的:表征医院药房领导如何分配他们的药剂师在他们的网站。方法:本定性研究采用对加拿大BC省医院药房负责人的关键线人访谈。访谈指南中包括七个问题,询问参与者组织临床药师覆盖的理念,探索当前工作人员水平的充分性,询问障碍和推动因素,并查看质量保证机制的使用。结果:对16名参与者进行了访谈。这些数据产生了五个主题:临床人员分配、提供最佳药房服务的障碍、临床工作优先级、人员培训和招聘以及质量保证。结论:BC省药房领导在分配临床人员时考虑了多种因素。虽然资金是人力资源分配的一个重要因素,但即使有充足的资金,也缺乏受过适当训练的工作人员来填补现有的职位。未来的探索需要确定药师分配的最佳方法与患者的结果,并确定新的方式来支持临床药师的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书