Effects of Pharmacist Chart Review and Pharmacist Interventions on Diabetes GAP Scores in the Rural Ambulatory Care Setting.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-07-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i2.6541
Austin Steichen, Mark Dewey, Daniel Friesner, DeeAnna Hanson, Sydney Kleven
{"title":"Effects of Pharmacist Chart Review and Pharmacist Interventions on Diabetes GAP Scores in the Rural Ambulatory Care Setting.","authors":"Austin Steichen, Mark Dewey, Daniel Friesner, DeeAnna Hanson, Sydney Kleven","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i2.6541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Minnesota Community Measurement assesses health system performance for diabetes care based on five measures: blood glucose (A1c), blood pressure (BP), cholesterol (LDL), tobacco use, and aspirin use, aggregated and known as a \"GAP score.\" Rural areas are negatively impacted by inadequate diabetes care. The positive impact of direct pharmacist patient care on diabetes management is well established, but research on indirect care is lacking. <b>Objective:</b> To assess the impact of pharmacist chart review on GAP scores in a rural primary care clinic. <b>Methods:</b> This was an evidence-based practice project conducted in a rural primary care clinic. Pre- and post-intervention GAP data were collected between January 1, 2023, and February 27, 2024. For each patient, pharmacists reviewed patient medical records for GAP score-related interventions. Reviews were completed at least one day prior to the patient's primary care appointment and sent to the appropriate providers via a secure messaging system. The primary study outcome was the frequency of patients experiencing a reduction in their GAP scores. Secondary outcomes included (1) the frequency of patients meeting the A1c, BP, LDL, tobacco use, and aspirin use GAP goals after one year, and (2) the frequency of patients transitioning from not meeting to meeting each of these GAP goals after one year. The primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the pharmacist and no-pharmacist intervention groups using Chi-square statistics. <b>Results:</b> Patients in the pharmacist intervention group were more likely to experience a reduction in GAP score (p<0.001), and met the A1c and tobacco usage GAP goal more often. Meeting the tobacco use GAP goal, however, was related more to the greater number of patients at goal in the intervention group at baseline. The treatment group was more likely to transition from not meeting to meeting the A1c, blood pressure, and aspirin GAP goals after one year. No significant changes were seen for the LDL GAP goal. <b>Conclusions:</b> Prospective pharmacist chart review may improve diabetes care in rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i2.6541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Minnesota Community Measurement assesses health system performance for diabetes care based on five measures: blood glucose (A1c), blood pressure (BP), cholesterol (LDL), tobacco use, and aspirin use, aggregated and known as a "GAP score." Rural areas are negatively impacted by inadequate diabetes care. The positive impact of direct pharmacist patient care on diabetes management is well established, but research on indirect care is lacking. Objective: To assess the impact of pharmacist chart review on GAP scores in a rural primary care clinic. Methods: This was an evidence-based practice project conducted in a rural primary care clinic. Pre- and post-intervention GAP data were collected between January 1, 2023, and February 27, 2024. For each patient, pharmacists reviewed patient medical records for GAP score-related interventions. Reviews were completed at least one day prior to the patient's primary care appointment and sent to the appropriate providers via a secure messaging system. The primary study outcome was the frequency of patients experiencing a reduction in their GAP scores. Secondary outcomes included (1) the frequency of patients meeting the A1c, BP, LDL, tobacco use, and aspirin use GAP goals after one year, and (2) the frequency of patients transitioning from not meeting to meeting each of these GAP goals after one year. The primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the pharmacist and no-pharmacist intervention groups using Chi-square statistics. Results: Patients in the pharmacist intervention group were more likely to experience a reduction in GAP score (p<0.001), and met the A1c and tobacco usage GAP goal more often. Meeting the tobacco use GAP goal, however, was related more to the greater number of patients at goal in the intervention group at baseline. The treatment group was more likely to transition from not meeting to meeting the A1c, blood pressure, and aspirin GAP goals after one year. No significant changes were seen for the LDL GAP goal. Conclusions: Prospective pharmacist chart review may improve diabetes care in rural areas.

药师表回顾和药师干预对农村门诊糖尿病GAP评分的影响。
背景:明尼苏达州社区测量基于五项指标评估卫生系统对糖尿病护理的绩效:血糖(A1c)、血压(BP)、胆固醇(LDL)、烟草使用和阿司匹林使用,汇总并称为“GAP评分”。农村地区受到糖尿病护理不足的负面影响。药师直接护理对糖尿病患者管理的积极影响已得到证实,但对间接护理的研究尚缺乏。目的:评价药师表复习对农村基层卫生保健诊所GAP评分的影响。方法:这是一个在农村初级保健诊所进行的循证实践项目。在2023年1月1日至2024年2月27日期间收集干预前后的GAP数据。对于每位患者,药剂师回顾了与GAP评分相关的干预措施的患者医疗记录。审查至少在患者的初级保健预约前一天完成,并通过安全信息系统发送给适当的提供者。主要研究结果是患者的GAP评分下降的频率。次要结局包括(1)患者在一年后达到A1c、BP、LDL、烟草使用和阿司匹林使用GAP目标的频率,以及(2)患者在一年后从未达到这些GAP目标转变为达到这些目标的频率。采用卡方统计方法比较药师干预组和无药师干预组的主要和次要结局。结果:药师干预组的患者更有可能经历GAP评分的降低。结论:前瞻性药师表回顾可以改善农村地区的糖尿病护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书