Academic conference posters: A systematic review.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-10-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i3.6629
Michael J Peeters, Wade Lee-Smith, David D Allen, Christopher Giuliano
{"title":"Academic conference posters: A systematic review.","authors":"Michael J Peeters, Wade Lee-Smith, David D Allen, Christopher Giuliano","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i3.6629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Many faculty, postgraduate trainees, and students present posters to disseminate their research and engage in professional development. While reputable journals have formal guidance and rigor to their manuscript publication process, posters can vary more in quality. Both add value to the literature, but it is less clear what literature exists on the content and value of scholarly posters. We aimed to review the literature on academic-style posters. <b>Methods</b>: We systematically searched 10 education, psychology, and health-sciences databases to identify journal articles describing academic-style posters. Titles and abstracts were screened with articles sorted into categories. One author initially sorted, and another author reviewed/confirmed how each article was sorted. In this mixed-methods systematic review, categories were then examined either using qualitative thematic-analysis or quantitative content-analysis, wherein two authors independently reviewed each included article. <b>Results</b>: Our search yielded 3570 articles. The 439 remaining after title/abstract screening represented a range of professions/disciplines, mostly from health-professions. We inductively sorted articles into five categories: Poster Guidance, Poster Quality Rubrics, Posters within education, Technology Integration with Posters, and Posters as Supportive Aids. An overarching theme of posters as Science-based Visual Communication was observed across all five categories and integrated to enhance the overall description of posters (i.e., complementary). <b>Conclusion</b>: Visual Communication and Scientific Rigor were vital to poster quality, assessment rubrics had little psychometric evidence, and posters used in education settings appeared numerous and a promising pedagogical aid. These insights can be used to further improve assessment of posters and ultimately professional development of students/trainees/faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i3.6629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many faculty, postgraduate trainees, and students present posters to disseminate their research and engage in professional development. While reputable journals have formal guidance and rigor to their manuscript publication process, posters can vary more in quality. Both add value to the literature, but it is less clear what literature exists on the content and value of scholarly posters. We aimed to review the literature on academic-style posters. Methods: We systematically searched 10 education, psychology, and health-sciences databases to identify journal articles describing academic-style posters. Titles and abstracts were screened with articles sorted into categories. One author initially sorted, and another author reviewed/confirmed how each article was sorted. In this mixed-methods systematic review, categories were then examined either using qualitative thematic-analysis or quantitative content-analysis, wherein two authors independently reviewed each included article. Results: Our search yielded 3570 articles. The 439 remaining after title/abstract screening represented a range of professions/disciplines, mostly from health-professions. We inductively sorted articles into five categories: Poster Guidance, Poster Quality Rubrics, Posters within education, Technology Integration with Posters, and Posters as Supportive Aids. An overarching theme of posters as Science-based Visual Communication was observed across all five categories and integrated to enhance the overall description of posters (i.e., complementary). Conclusion: Visual Communication and Scientific Rigor were vital to poster quality, assessment rubrics had little psychometric evidence, and posters used in education settings appeared numerous and a promising pedagogical aid. These insights can be used to further improve assessment of posters and ultimately professional development of students/trainees/faculty.

学术会议海报:系统回顾。
简介:许多教师、研究生学员和学生展示海报来传播他们的研究和从事专业发展。虽然声誉良好的期刊对其手稿出版过程有正式的指导和严格的要求,但海报的质量可能会有所不同。两者都增加了文献的价值,但在学术海报的内容和价值上存在什么文献是不太清楚的。我们的目的是回顾学术风格海报的文献。方法:我们系统地检索了10个教育、心理学和健康科学数据库,以确定描述学院派海报的期刊文章。题目和摘要经过筛选,文章按类别分类。一名作者开始排序,另一名作者审核/确认每篇文章的排序方式。在这个混合方法的系统综述中,然后使用定性主题分析或定量内容分析来检查类别,其中两位作者独立地审查了每篇纳入的文章。结果:我们检索了3570篇文章。标题/摘要筛选后剩下的439篇论文代表了一系列专业/学科,主要来自卫生专业。我们将文章归纳为五个类别:海报指南、海报质量准则、教育中的海报、与海报的技术整合、以及作为辅助工具的海报。在所有五个类别中都观察到海报作为基于科学的视觉传播的总体主题,并将其整合以增强海报的整体描述(即互补)。结论:视觉传达和科学严密性对海报质量至关重要,评估标准几乎没有心理测量证据,在教育环境中使用的海报数量众多,是一种有前途的教学辅助手段。这些见解可用于进一步改进对海报的评估,并最终促进学生/学员/教师的专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书