Assessing the impact of pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated patient enrollment in Meds to Beds services.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-08-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i2.6378
Shervin Gorji, Alla Melamed Khaytin, Emily Zoelle, Anatoliy Fain, Jordan Denas, Tammy Nguyen, Joshua Yaich
{"title":"Assessing the impact of pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated patient enrollment in Meds to Beds services.","authors":"Shervin Gorji, Alla Melamed Khaytin, Emily Zoelle, Anatoliy Fain, Jordan Denas, Tammy Nguyen, Joshua Yaich","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i2.6378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study evaluated the impact of pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated patient enrollment in the Meds to Beds program. The primary objective was to compare the number of high-risk readmission patients enrolled through pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated processes. Secondary objectives included comparing 30-day all-cause and heart failure readmission rates, number of prescriptions delivered, patients receiving pharmacist counseling, and impact on HCAHPS scores. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, single-center cohort study compared patients in the provider-initiated program (August-October 2023) with those in the pharmacist-initiated program (November 2023-February 2024) at Mount Sinai Brooklyn. Inclusion criteria for the intervention group included patients with COPD, asthma, CHF, ACS, diabetes, hypertension, or age >75. Exclusion criteria included discharges to long-term care facilities and prescriptions for C-II controlled substances. Data analysis included the number of patients being enrolled, counseling numbers, prescribed medications, and readmission rates. Data were sourced from Epic. Descriptive statistics, p-values, and chi-squared testing were used for analysis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 380 patients were enrolled in the pharmacist-initiated group and 162 in the provider-initiated group; 228 and 162 patients received counseling in the respective groups. Of those counseled, 19.7% in the pharmacist-initiated group were readmitted within 30 days, compared to 19.1% in the provider-initiated group. For heart failure patients, 29.6% in the pharmacist-initiated group were readmitted within 30 days, versus 36.4% in the provider-initiated group. HCAHPS scores increased by 15% from Q1 to Q4 2023. The pharmacist-initiated process saw a 26% increase in total medications prescribed. <b>Conclusion:</b> Pharmacists played a pivotal role in enhancing the Meds to Beds process to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233175/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i2.6378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the impact of pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated patient enrollment in the Meds to Beds program. The primary objective was to compare the number of high-risk readmission patients enrolled through pharmacist-initiated versus provider-initiated processes. Secondary objectives included comparing 30-day all-cause and heart failure readmission rates, number of prescriptions delivered, patients receiving pharmacist counseling, and impact on HCAHPS scores. Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study compared patients in the provider-initiated program (August-October 2023) with those in the pharmacist-initiated program (November 2023-February 2024) at Mount Sinai Brooklyn. Inclusion criteria for the intervention group included patients with COPD, asthma, CHF, ACS, diabetes, hypertension, or age >75. Exclusion criteria included discharges to long-term care facilities and prescriptions for C-II controlled substances. Data analysis included the number of patients being enrolled, counseling numbers, prescribed medications, and readmission rates. Data were sourced from Epic. Descriptive statistics, p-values, and chi-squared testing were used for analysis. Results: A total of 380 patients were enrolled in the pharmacist-initiated group and 162 in the provider-initiated group; 228 and 162 patients received counseling in the respective groups. Of those counseled, 19.7% in the pharmacist-initiated group were readmitted within 30 days, compared to 19.1% in the provider-initiated group. For heart failure patients, 29.6% in the pharmacist-initiated group were readmitted within 30 days, versus 36.4% in the provider-initiated group. HCAHPS scores increased by 15% from Q1 to Q4 2023. The pharmacist-initiated process saw a 26% increase in total medications prescribed. Conclusion: Pharmacists played a pivotal role in enhancing the Meds to Beds process to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

评估药剂师发起的药物到病床服务与提供者发起的患者登记的影响。
目的:本研究评估了药剂师发起的与提供者发起的药物到病床项目患者登记的影响。主要目的是比较通过药剂师发起和提供者发起的流程登记的高风险再入院患者的数量。次要目标包括比较30天全因和心力衰竭的再入院率、交付的处方数量、接受药师咨询的患者以及对HCAHPS评分的影响。方法:这项回顾性、单中心队列研究比较了布鲁克林西奈山医院由医生发起的项目(2023年8月至10月)和由药剂师发起的项目(2023年11月至2024年2月)的患者。干预组的纳入标准包括COPD、哮喘、CHF、ACS、糖尿病、高血压或年龄在75岁以下的患者。排除标准包括出院至长期护理机构和C-II管制药物处方。数据分析包括入组的患者人数、咨询人数、处方药物和再入院率。数据来源于Epic。采用描述性统计、p值和卡方检验进行分析。结果:共有380例患者被纳入药师发起组,162例患者被纳入提供者发起组;分别有228和162名患者接受了咨询。在接受咨询的患者中,由药剂师发起的组中有19.7%的患者在30天内再次入院,而由医生发起的组中这一比例为19.1%。对于心力衰竭患者,由药剂师发起的组中有29.6%的患者在30天内再次入院,而由医生发起的组中有36.4%。从2023年第一季度到第四季度,HCAHPS分数增加了15%。药剂师发起的过程中,总药物处方增加了26%。结论:药师在加强“药到床”过程中发挥了关键作用,提高了患者的治疗效果和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书