Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain and Menstrual Symptoms in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Placebo-Controlled Study

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Journal of midwifery & women's health Pub Date : 2026-10-11 Epub Date: 2026-06-07 DOI:10.1111/jmwh.70138
Esra Ünal PhD
{"title":"Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Pain and Menstrual Symptoms in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Placebo-Controlled Study","authors":"Esra Ünal PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Primary dysmenorrhea, with a prevalence of 45% to 95%, is a common gynecological condition that significantly affects women's daily functioning and quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This randomized, single-masked study compared the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain intensity and menstrual symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea using a 3-arm design including TENS (n = 31), placebo (n = 31), and no-intervention control (n = 31) groups. TENS was administered in two 20-minute sessions on the same day during the first 3 days of menstruation. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and menstrual symptoms were assessed with the Daily Menstrual Symptom Rating (DMSR) scale. Between-group differences in postintervention outcomes were analyzed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline values. The trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06741059).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After baseline adjustment, significant between-group differences were observed in pain intensity and menstrual symptoms. Adjusted posttest VAS scores were lowest in the TENS group, followed by the placebo group and the control group (<i>P</i> &lt; .001), with a large effect size (partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.428). Adjusted posttest DMSR scores were significantly lower in the TENS group compared with the control group (<i>P</i> &lt; .01) with a large effect size (partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.160); however, no significant difference was observed between the TENS and placebo groups. Pain scores in the placebo group were also lower than those in the control group, indicating a notable placebo effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>TENS represents a safe, accessible, and patient-centered option for short-term menstrual pain management beyond placebo effects in primary dysmenorrhea.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":"71 5","pages":"769-777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jmwh.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmwh.70138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Primary dysmenorrhea, with a prevalence of 45% to 95%, is a common gynecological condition that significantly affects women's daily functioning and quality of life.

Methods

This randomized, single-masked study compared the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain intensity and menstrual symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea using a 3-arm design including TENS (n = 31), placebo (n = 31), and no-intervention control (n = 31) groups. TENS was administered in two 20-minute sessions on the same day during the first 3 days of menstruation. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and menstrual symptoms were assessed with the Daily Menstrual Symptom Rating (DMSR) scale. Between-group differences in postintervention outcomes were analyzed using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline values. The trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06741059).

Results

After baseline adjustment, significant between-group differences were observed in pain intensity and menstrual symptoms. Adjusted posttest VAS scores were lowest in the TENS group, followed by the placebo group and the control group (P < .001), with a large effect size (partial η2 = 0.428). Adjusted posttest DMSR scores were significantly lower in the TENS group compared with the control group (P < .01) with a large effect size (partial η2 = 0.160); however, no significant difference was observed between the TENS and placebo groups. Pain scores in the placebo group were also lower than those in the control group, indicating a notable placebo effect.

Discussion

TENS represents a safe, accessible, and patient-centered option for short-term menstrual pain management beyond placebo effects in primary dysmenorrhea.

经皮神经电刺激对原发性痛经疼痛和月经症状的影响:一项安慰剂对照研究
简介:原发性痛经是一种常见的妇科疾病,严重影响妇女的日常功能和生活质量,发病率为45% ~ 95%。方法:这项随机、单盲的研究比较了经皮神经电刺激(TENS)对原发性痛经女性疼痛强度和月经症状的影响,采用三组设计,包括TENS组(n = 31)、安慰剂组(n = 31)和无干预对照组(n = 31)。在月经的前3天,在同一天进行两次20分钟的TENS。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛强度,采用每日月经症状评分(DMSR)量表评估月经症状。采用协方差分析分析干预后结果的组间差异,调整基线值。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06741059)前瞻性注册。结果:基线调整后,组间疼痛强度和月经症状有显著差异。经校正后VAS评分以TENS组最低,其次为安慰剂组和对照组(P 2 = 0.428)。TENS组调整后DMSR评分显著低于对照组(P 2 = 0.160);然而,在TENS组和安慰剂组之间没有观察到显著差异。安慰剂组的疼痛评分也低于对照组,表明安慰剂效应显著。讨论:TENS代表了一种安全、可及、以患者为中心的治疗原发性痛经的短期月经疼痛的选择,而不是安慰剂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Midwifery & Women''s Health (JMWH) is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research and review articles that focus on midwifery and women''s health. JMWH provides a forum for interdisciplinary exchange across a broad range of women''s health issues. Manuscripts that address midwifery, women''s health, education, evidence-based practice, public health, policy, and research are welcomed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书