Communication and Cholera Morbus: measures and fears in 19th Century Italy in the face of an unknown evil. Medical ignorance and ideological paradigms unchanged over time.

Mariano Martini, Federico Danielli
{"title":"Communication and <i>Cholera Morbus</i>: measures and fears in 19<sup>th</sup> Century Italy in the face of an unknown evil. Medical ignorance and ideological paradigms unchanged over time.","authors":"Mariano Martini, Federico Danielli","doi":"10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.4.3797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The arrival of Cholera Morbus in Europe and Italy elicited a prompt institutional reaction. Starting in 1831, preventive measures characteristic of the plagues of the \"Ancien Régime\" were reactivated. The new disease triggered several instinctive and irrational reactions in the population, which resulted in the most diverse fears: fear of death, of doctors, of food, isolation, and abuse of food and alcohol. Ignorance of the origin of the disease, its etiology and modes of transmission meant that containment measures and treatment were often inefficacious. When patients recovered from the disease, this was due more to their living conditions and underlying state of health than to medical treatment, which was still limited to bloodletting, purgatives, and natural remedies (as emerges from the data from 1835 in the archives of the Genoese hospitals). As revealed by the pamphlets distributed around 1830, the disease was attributed to dietary disorders, personal and domestic hygiene, damp environments, menial occupations, and exposure to cold.The medical theories of the time were still closely bound to the \"miasmatic-humoral paradigm\", as the discoveries of Filippo Pacini, (1812-1883), John Snow (1813-1858) and Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) had not yet been made. As for preventive measures at the institutional level, \"contagionist\" theories prevailed, which meant that sanitary cordons were reintroduced, safety measures (e.g. quarantine on people and goods) were implemented and great attention was placed on cleansing and disinfecting streets and public places.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>For centuries, Cholera Morbus was endemic to the territory of Bengal; only with the revolution in transport, starting from 1817, did the disease first spread beyond India [1], replacing the plague as the \"scourge of urban populations\" [2]. Cholera was localized in Asia until 1817, when a first pandemic spread from India to other regions of the world. Endemic in Asia, (in the delta of the Ganges-India), it remained enclosed to that geographical area until the beginning of the 1800s. It first emerged from the Sundarbans Forest where the bacterium Vibrio cholerae had perhaps been mutating for millennia.It afterwards moved to the Mediterranean and Europe as new commerce routes were opened up between East and West and in the 1830s, Western Europe was faced with this totally new and unknown evil [3], which appeared in Italy in 1835.</p>","PeriodicalId":94106,"journal":{"name":"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene","volume":"66 4","pages":"E635-E642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2025.66.4.3797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The arrival of Cholera Morbus in Europe and Italy elicited a prompt institutional reaction. Starting in 1831, preventive measures characteristic of the plagues of the "Ancien Régime" were reactivated. The new disease triggered several instinctive and irrational reactions in the population, which resulted in the most diverse fears: fear of death, of doctors, of food, isolation, and abuse of food and alcohol. Ignorance of the origin of the disease, its etiology and modes of transmission meant that containment measures and treatment were often inefficacious. When patients recovered from the disease, this was due more to their living conditions and underlying state of health than to medical treatment, which was still limited to bloodletting, purgatives, and natural remedies (as emerges from the data from 1835 in the archives of the Genoese hospitals). As revealed by the pamphlets distributed around 1830, the disease was attributed to dietary disorders, personal and domestic hygiene, damp environments, menial occupations, and exposure to cold.The medical theories of the time were still closely bound to the "miasmatic-humoral paradigm", as the discoveries of Filippo Pacini, (1812-1883), John Snow (1813-1858) and Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) had not yet been made. As for preventive measures at the institutional level, "contagionist" theories prevailed, which meant that sanitary cordons were reintroduced, safety measures (e.g. quarantine on people and goods) were implemented and great attention was placed on cleansing and disinfecting streets and public places.

Background: For centuries, Cholera Morbus was endemic to the territory of Bengal; only with the revolution in transport, starting from 1817, did the disease first spread beyond India [1], replacing the plague as the "scourge of urban populations" [2]. Cholera was localized in Asia until 1817, when a first pandemic spread from India to other regions of the world. Endemic in Asia, (in the delta of the Ganges-India), it remained enclosed to that geographical area until the beginning of the 1800s. It first emerged from the Sundarbans Forest where the bacterium Vibrio cholerae had perhaps been mutating for millennia.It afterwards moved to the Mediterranean and Europe as new commerce routes were opened up between East and West and in the 1830s, Western Europe was faced with this totally new and unknown evil [3], which appeared in Italy in 1835.

通讯与霍乱:19世纪意大利面对未知邪恶的措施与恐惧。医学无知和意识形态范式随着时间的推移而改变。
摘要:霍乱传入欧洲和意大利后,迅速引起了制度性反应。从1831年开始,重新启动了具有“旧革命”瘟疫特征的预防措施。这种新疾病在人群中引发了几种本能和非理性的反应,导致了各种各样的恐惧:害怕死亡、害怕医生、害怕食物、害怕隔离、害怕食物和酒精的滥用。对疾病的起源、病因学和传播方式的无知意味着遏制措施和治疗往往无效。当病人从疾病中康复时,这更多地是由于他们的生活条件和潜在的健康状况,而不是医疗,医疗仍然局限于放血、泻药和自然疗法(如热那亚医院档案中1835年的数据所示)。正如1830年前后散发的小册子所揭示的那样,这种疾病是由于饮食失调、个人和家庭卫生、潮湿的环境、卑微的职业和受寒造成的。当时的医学理论仍然与“瘴气-体液范式”密切相关,因为菲利波·帕西尼(1812-1883)、约翰·斯诺(1813-1858)和海因里希·赫尔曼·罗伯特·科赫(1843-1910)还没有发现。至于制度层面的预防措施,“传染论”理论占了上风,这意味着重新引入了卫生警戒线,实施了安全措施(例如对人员和货物进行检疫),并非常重视街道和公共场所的清洁和消毒。背景:几个世纪以来,霍乱是孟加拉地区的地方性疾病;直到1817年开始的交通革命,这种疾病才首次传播到印度以外,取代鼠疫成为“城市人口的祸害”。直到1817年,霍乱才局限于亚洲,当时第一次大流行从印度传播到世界其他地区。它在亚洲流行(在恒河-印度三角洲),直到19世纪初,它一直被封闭在该地理区域。它首先出现在孙德尔本斯森林,那里的霍乱弧菌可能已经变异了几千年。后来,随着东西方之间新的商业路线的开辟,它转移到了地中海和欧洲。19世纪30年代,西欧面临着一种全新的、未知的邪恶势力,它于1835年出现在意大利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书