Observational pilot study: Assessing utilization rates of safe-disposal systems for acute opioid prescriptions post pharmacist-led counseling.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-10-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i3.6326
Mary Catherine Platz, Erica Shelton, Gretchen K Garofoli, Betsy M Elswick
{"title":"Observational pilot study: Assessing utilization rates of safe-disposal systems for acute opioid prescriptions post pharmacist-led counseling.","authors":"Mary Catherine Platz, Erica Shelton, Gretchen K Garofoli, Betsy M Elswick","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i3.6326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> While previous studies have highlighted the critical need for safe opioid disposal systems, there is limited information regarding patient utilization of these systems. This study aimed to determine if pharmacist-led education improved patients' use of medication disposal systems. <b>Methods:</b> An observational pilot study was conducted at a single location of a large community pharmacy chain, enrolling patients receiving acute opioid prescriptions for short-term pain management following an outpatient procedure or inpatient admission. The objective was to determine if in-depth, pharmacist-led disposal counseling had an impact on patient utilization of a safe disposal system. Eligible patients were assigned to either the control or study group and underwent the appropriate counseling. Both groups received standard-of-care pharmacist-led counseling at prescription pick-up, and the treatment group received additional information regarding the disposal system. After three weeks, participants were contacted via telephone to determine if the disposal system was used. <b>Results:</b> A total of 100 participants were enrolled, with 63 completing the follow-up questionnaire. Among those, 3 participants (4.8%) reported using the safe medication disposal system for the dispensed opioid or an unwanted medication in their household, though it was unclear if these medications were initially co-dispensed with the disposal system. Twenty-seven participants (42.9%) reported no remaining medication, while 6 participants (16.7%) with leftover medication expressed a desire to keep it in case of future pain. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study demonstrates that patients are unlikely to utilize safe disposal systems for unused opioids, even with pharmacist counseling. These findings highlight the need for further research into effective disposal strategies and the development of more robust interventions to enhance safe medication practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13233161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i3.6326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While previous studies have highlighted the critical need for safe opioid disposal systems, there is limited information regarding patient utilization of these systems. This study aimed to determine if pharmacist-led education improved patients' use of medication disposal systems. Methods: An observational pilot study was conducted at a single location of a large community pharmacy chain, enrolling patients receiving acute opioid prescriptions for short-term pain management following an outpatient procedure or inpatient admission. The objective was to determine if in-depth, pharmacist-led disposal counseling had an impact on patient utilization of a safe disposal system. Eligible patients were assigned to either the control or study group and underwent the appropriate counseling. Both groups received standard-of-care pharmacist-led counseling at prescription pick-up, and the treatment group received additional information regarding the disposal system. After three weeks, participants were contacted via telephone to determine if the disposal system was used. Results: A total of 100 participants were enrolled, with 63 completing the follow-up questionnaire. Among those, 3 participants (4.8%) reported using the safe medication disposal system for the dispensed opioid or an unwanted medication in their household, though it was unclear if these medications were initially co-dispensed with the disposal system. Twenty-seven participants (42.9%) reported no remaining medication, while 6 participants (16.7%) with leftover medication expressed a desire to keep it in case of future pain. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that patients are unlikely to utilize safe disposal systems for unused opioids, even with pharmacist counseling. These findings highlight the need for further research into effective disposal strategies and the development of more robust interventions to enhance safe medication practices.

观察性试点研究:评估药剂师主导咨询后急性阿片类药物处方安全处置系统的使用率。
背景:虽然以前的研究强调了对安全阿片类药物处理系统的迫切需要,但关于患者使用这些系统的信息有限。本研究旨在确定药师主导的教育是否能改善患者对药物处置系统的使用。方法:在一家大型社区连锁药店的单一地点进行了一项观察性试点研究,招募了在门诊或住院后接受急性阿片类药物处方治疗短期疼痛的患者。目的是确定深入的,以药剂师为主导的处置咨询是否对患者使用安全处置系统有影响。符合条件的患者被分配到对照组或研究组,并接受适当的咨询。两组在取处方时都接受了标准护理药剂师主导的咨询,治疗组接受了有关处理系统的额外信息。三周后,通过电话联系参与者,以确定是否使用了处理系统。结果:共纳入100例受试者,其中63例完成随访问卷。其中,3名参与者(4.8%)报告使用安全药物处置系统处理分配的阿片类药物或家庭中不需要的药物,尽管尚不清楚这些药物最初是否与处置系统共同分配。27名参与者(42.9%)报告没有剩余的药物,而6名参与者(16.7%)有剩余的药物表示希望保留药物以备将来疼痛。结论:本研究表明,即使有药师咨询,患者也不太可能使用未使用阿片类药物的安全处置系统。这些发现突出表明需要进一步研究有效的处置策略和发展更有力的干预措施,以加强安全的用药实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书