Multidisciplinary Timely Debrief Sessions after Cardiac Arrests and Endotracheal Intubations in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000891
Jonathan A Hermel, Yvette Wang, Jamie M Klapp, Amy Bryl, Martha Pannepacker, Elise Zimmerman
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Timely Debrief Sessions after Cardiac Arrests and Endotracheal Intubations in the Pediatric Emergency Department.","authors":"Jonathan A Hermel, Yvette Wang, Jamie M Klapp, Amy Bryl, Martha Pannepacker, Elise Zimmerman","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multidisciplinary clinical debriefs are structured discussions following critical events to assess performance, identify improvement opportunities, and provide team support. Despite known benefits, debriefs are underused. We aimed to increase debrief completion following pediatric emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and endotracheal intubations. The primary outcome was the percentage of critical events with a completed debrief form. To assess potential workflow disruptions, we assessed 2 balancing measures: room-to-provider and door-to-provider times among Emergency Severity Index level 1 and 2 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A key driver diagram guided targeted interventions. We implemented a standardized Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) debrief form using a plus-delta framework with scripted prompts, accessible via quick response codes throughout the ED. As part of the intervention design, debriefs were encouraged within 30 minutes of the event and were designed to last 7 minutes or less. Educational initiatives included staff meetings, email reminders, newsletters, signage, and designated nursing champions. We used statistical process control to assess changes over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Debrief completion increased from 4% to 52% during 15 months, showing special-cause variation. Median room-to-provider times remained unchanged. Median door-to-provider times decreased during the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple interventions significantly increased the use of structured debriefing without adversely affecting patient flow. Structured debriefing is both feasible and sustainable in high-acuity ED settings, particularly when supported by ongoing education and active team engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"11 3","pages":"e891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13241288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multidisciplinary clinical debriefs are structured discussions following critical events to assess performance, identify improvement opportunities, and provide team support. Despite known benefits, debriefs are underused. We aimed to increase debrief completion following pediatric emergency department (ED) cardiac arrests and endotracheal intubations. The primary outcome was the percentage of critical events with a completed debrief form. To assess potential workflow disruptions, we assessed 2 balancing measures: room-to-provider and door-to-provider times among Emergency Severity Index level 1 and 2 patients.

Methods: A key driver diagram guided targeted interventions. We implemented a standardized Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) debrief form using a plus-delta framework with scripted prompts, accessible via quick response codes throughout the ED. As part of the intervention design, debriefs were encouraged within 30 minutes of the event and were designed to last 7 minutes or less. Educational initiatives included staff meetings, email reminders, newsletters, signage, and designated nursing champions. We used statistical process control to assess changes over time.

Results: Debrief completion increased from 4% to 52% during 15 months, showing special-cause variation. Median room-to-provider times remained unchanged. Median door-to-provider times decreased during the intervention period.

Conclusions: Multiple interventions significantly increased the use of structured debriefing without adversely affecting patient flow. Structured debriefing is both feasible and sustainable in high-acuity ED settings, particularly when supported by ongoing education and active team engagement.

儿科急诊科心脏骤停和气管插管后多学科及时汇报会议。
简介:多学科临床汇报是在关键事件后进行的结构化讨论,以评估绩效,确定改进机会,并提供团队支持。尽管有众所周知的好处,但汇报没有得到充分利用。我们的目的是提高儿科急诊科(ED)心脏骤停和气管插管后的报告完成率。主要结果是完成汇报的关键事件的百分比。为了评估潜在的工作流程中断,我们评估了两种平衡措施:紧急严重程度指数1级和2级患者从病房到提供者和从门到提供者的时间。方法:关键驱动图指导有针对性的干预措施。我们使用带有脚本提示的+ -delta框架实施了标准化的研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)汇报表,通过整个ED的快速响应代码访问。作为干预设计的一部分,鼓励在事件发生后30分钟内进行汇报,并将其设计为7分钟或更短。教育活动包括员工会议、电子邮件提醒、时事通讯、标牌和指定护理冠军。我们使用统计过程控制来评估随时间的变化。结果:15个月内,汇报完成率从4%上升到52%,呈现特殊原因变化。从房间到供应商的平均时间保持不变。在干预期间,从门到供应商的平均时间减少了。结论:多重干预显著增加了结构化汇报的使用,而不会对患者流量产生不利影响。结构化的汇报在高灵敏度ED环境中既可行又可持续,特别是在持续的教育和积极的团队参与的支持下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书