Agency-Level Turnover Rates of Emergency Medical Service Clinicians and Their Characteristics.

IF 1.8 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jordan D Kurth, Jonathan R Powell, Christopher B Gage, Jacob C Kamholz, Shea van den Bergh, Rebecca E Cash, Ashish R Panchal
{"title":"Agency-Level Turnover Rates of Emergency Medical Service Clinicians and Their Characteristics.","authors":"Jordan D Kurth, Jonathan R Powell, Christopher B Gage, Jacob C Kamholz, Shea van den Bergh, Rebecca E Cash, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency medical service (EMS) clinician-level turnover is high and varies dramatically by agency type. There is a need to evaluate mean turnover rates, adjusted by agency characteristics, to provide standardized and comparable measures across workplace settings. Our objective was to leverage recent methods to evaluate agency-level mean turnover and describe the agency-level characteristics of those leaving the agency of record.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2-year retrospective evaluation of EMS clinicians from 2020 to 2022 was conducted to evaluate agency-level turnover. EMS clinicians and agencies from 9 states that required National EMS Certification to obtain/maintain EMS licensure were used. Demographic and EMS-related characteristics were collected, including agency-specific attributes (agency type, service type, majority full-time employees) and state-level identifiers. The percentage of those leaving each EMS agency was calculated, and multivariable linear regression was used to calculate adjusted agency-level mean turnover rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1137 EMS agencies with 20,881 EMS clinicians met the inclusion criteria. The adjusted agency-level mean turnover rate was 17.4% and varied dramatically based on agency type (14.3% to 23.7%), with the lowest being fire agencies and the highest being private. When we examined the EMS demographics and work-related characteristics, we discovered significant variability, which is consistent with the theory that each agency type may have different characteristics of clinicians leaving.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjusted agency-level mean turnover rates varied dramatically by agency type with associated variability in EMS clinician demographics and workplace characteristics. This suggests that the characteristics of agency turnover potentially vary by specific organizational culture, and identifying these variations may assist in developing interventions to enhance retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"7 4","pages":"100418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13241709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2026.100418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency medical service (EMS) clinician-level turnover is high and varies dramatically by agency type. There is a need to evaluate mean turnover rates, adjusted by agency characteristics, to provide standardized and comparable measures across workplace settings. Our objective was to leverage recent methods to evaluate agency-level mean turnover and describe the agency-level characteristics of those leaving the agency of record.

Methods: A 2-year retrospective evaluation of EMS clinicians from 2020 to 2022 was conducted to evaluate agency-level turnover. EMS clinicians and agencies from 9 states that required National EMS Certification to obtain/maintain EMS licensure were used. Demographic and EMS-related characteristics were collected, including agency-specific attributes (agency type, service type, majority full-time employees) and state-level identifiers. The percentage of those leaving each EMS agency was calculated, and multivariable linear regression was used to calculate adjusted agency-level mean turnover rates.

Results: A total of 1137 EMS agencies with 20,881 EMS clinicians met the inclusion criteria. The adjusted agency-level mean turnover rate was 17.4% and varied dramatically based on agency type (14.3% to 23.7%), with the lowest being fire agencies and the highest being private. When we examined the EMS demographics and work-related characteristics, we discovered significant variability, which is consistent with the theory that each agency type may have different characteristics of clinicians leaving.

Conclusion: Adjusted agency-level mean turnover rates varied dramatically by agency type with associated variability in EMS clinician demographics and workplace characteristics. This suggests that the characteristics of agency turnover potentially vary by specific organizational culture, and identifying these variations may assist in developing interventions to enhance retention.

急诊医疗服务临床医生机构流失率及其特点
目的:急诊医疗服务(EMS)的临床医生流动率很高,不同机构类型的医生流动率差异很大。有必要评估按机构特点调整的平均离职率,以便提供跨工作场所环境的标准化和可比措施。我们的目标是利用最近的方法来评估机构级别的平均流动率,并描述那些离开记录机构的机构级别的特征。方法:对2020年至2022年EMS临床医生进行为期2年的回顾性评估,以评估机构级人员流失率。来自9个州的EMS临床医生和机构需要国家EMS认证才能获得/维持EMS许可证。收集了人口统计和ems相关特征,包括机构特定属性(机构类型、服务类型、大多数全职员工)和州一级标识符。计算每个EMS机构的离职率,并使用多变量线性回归计算调整后的机构水平平均离职率。结果:共有1137家EMS机构和20881名EMS临床医生符合纳入标准。调整后的机构级别平均离职率为17.4%,不同机构类型的离职率差异很大(14.3%至23.7%),其中最低的是消防机构,最高的是私营机构。当我们检查EMS的人口统计数据和工作相关特征时,我们发现了显著的可变性,这与每种机构类型可能具有不同临床医生离职特征的理论是一致的。结论:调整后的机构水平平均流失率因机构类型而异,并与EMS临床人口统计学和工作场所特征相关。这表明,机构更替的特征可能因具体的组织文化而异,识别这些变化可能有助于制定干预措施以提高留任率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书