Providing a safety net: a qualitative study on supporting medical students during goals of care discussions.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.80430
Conor Barker, Brooke Cheng, Marian Chen, Rose Hatala
{"title":"Providing a safety net: a qualitative study on supporting medical students during goals of care discussions.","authors":"Conor Barker, Brooke Cheng, Marian Chen, Rose Hatala","doi":"10.36834/cmej.80430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Engaging in effective goals of care (GOC) discussions with patients is a critical skill for physicians. Medical students, however, often feel unprepared, unsupported and uncomfortable leading these conversations. We undertook the current study to explore senior medical students' experiences with GOC discussions during their clinical training, examining when and how (and when not and how not) GOC discussions impacted them and the influence of supervision on their GOC learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used qualitative interpretive description as our methodology. Fourth-year medical students at a single university were invited to voluntarily participate. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to foster rich discussion about students' GOC experiences during their clinical rotations. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively. All investigators participated in data analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach to identify themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven fourth-year medical students were interviewed between 2021 and 2022. As students observed and conducted GOC conversations, participating in the conversation with a supportive clinical supervisor and with patients they knew appeared to positively influence students. In less supported environments, students experienced challenges during GOC conversations, reflected through perceived limitations and feelings of uncertainty. Supervisors also played an important role in helping students navigate a range of emotional responses to these conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rather than shielding students from difficult conversations, supervisors can positively impact students' experiences by supporting them to engage in GOC discussions, thereby providing them with the skills to support patients through challenging moments.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"17 2","pages":"34-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Engaging in effective goals of care (GOC) discussions with patients is a critical skill for physicians. Medical students, however, often feel unprepared, unsupported and uncomfortable leading these conversations. We undertook the current study to explore senior medical students' experiences with GOC discussions during their clinical training, examining when and how (and when not and how not) GOC discussions impacted them and the influence of supervision on their GOC learning.

Methods: We used qualitative interpretive description as our methodology. Fourth-year medical students at a single university were invited to voluntarily participate. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were used to foster rich discussion about students' GOC experiences during their clinical rotations. Data collection and analysis proceeded iteratively. All investigators participated in data analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach to identify themes and subthemes.

Results: Eleven fourth-year medical students were interviewed between 2021 and 2022. As students observed and conducted GOC conversations, participating in the conversation with a supportive clinical supervisor and with patients they knew appeared to positively influence students. In less supported environments, students experienced challenges during GOC conversations, reflected through perceived limitations and feelings of uncertainty. Supervisors also played an important role in helping students navigate a range of emotional responses to these conversations.

Conclusions: Rather than shielding students from difficult conversations, supervisors can positively impact students' experiences by supporting them to engage in GOC discussions, thereby providing them with the skills to support patients through challenging moments.

提供安全网:在医疗目标讨论期间支持医学生的定性研究。
背景:与患者进行有效的护理目标(GOC)讨论是医生的一项关键技能。然而,医科学生常常感到没有准备、没有支持和不舒服。本研究旨在探讨高年级医学生在临床训练中对GOC讨论的体验,考察GOC讨论何时、如何(以及何时、如何)影响他们,以及监督对他们GOC学习的影响。方法:采用定性解释描述方法。一所大学的四年级医学生被邀请自愿参与。采用定性半结构化访谈,促进学生在临床轮转期间关于GOC经历的丰富讨论。数据收集和分析迭代进行。所有调查人员都使用归纳、持续比较的方法参与数据分析,以确定主题和副主题。结果:在2021年至2022年期间对11名四年级医学生进行了访谈。当学生观察并进行GOC对话时,参与与支持性临床导师和他们认识的患者的对话似乎对学生产生了积极的影响。在支持较少的环境中,学生在GOC对话中遇到挑战,反映在感知到的限制和不确定感上。在帮助学生应对这些对话的一系列情绪反应方面,导师也发挥了重要作用。结论:与其屏蔽学生进行困难的对话,导师可以通过支持学生参与GOC讨论来积极影响学生的经历,从而为他们提供在具有挑战性的时刻支持患者的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书