Risk Stratification of Non-Relapse Mortality After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Based on Pre-Transplant Sarcopenia and HCT-CI.

Kensaku Kashima, Ayumi Kuzume, Wataru Kitamura, Tomohiro Urata, Haruka Akamatsu, Kako Hamasaki, Ken Matsumoto, Hiroki Iriyoshi, Satoshi Oka, Takuya Machida, Toshi Imai
{"title":"Risk Stratification of Non-Relapse Mortality After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Based on Pre-Transplant Sarcopenia and HCT-CI.","authors":"Kensaku Kashima, Ayumi Kuzume, Wataru Kitamura, Tomohiro Urata, Haruka Akamatsu, Kako Hamasaki, Ken Matsumoto, Hiroki Iriyoshi, Satoshi Oka, Takuya Machida, Toshi Imai","doi":"10.31547/bct-2026-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-relapse mortality (NRM) remains a major and often unavoidable adverse event following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), particularly among older adults and patients with multiple comorbidities. Although the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) is widely used for risk assessment, its predictive performance for NRM is limited, particularly for capturing functional status and physiological reserve. Sarcopenia, a marker of physical frailty and reduced physiological reserve, has recently emerged as a potential prognostic marker in transplant populations. This study aimed to determine whether combining pre-transplant sarcopenia with the HCT-CI improves NRM risk stratification after allo-HSCT. We retrospectively analyzed 95 adult patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT at our institution between May 2017 and December 2024. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria using standardized assessments of handgrip strength, gait speed, and skeletal muscle mass index. Patients were classified into high-risk (sarcopenia plus HCT-CI ≥ 3) or low-risk (others) groups. Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group showed significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM (41.7% vs. 16.1%, <i>p</i>=0.026) and poorer overall survival (33.3% vs. 71.0%, <i>p</i>=0.002). In multivariable analysis, the composite high-risk classification independently predicted NRM (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval, 1.26-9.64, <i>p</i>=0.018), while sarcopenia or HCT-CI alone did not. These findings suggest that integrating physical reserve and comorbidity potentially enhances NRM risk stratification after allo-HSCT. The composite index may provide a practical framework to help optimize conditioning intensity, guide prehabilitation strategies, and personalize post-transplant management.</p>","PeriodicalId":72423,"journal":{"name":"Blood cell therapy","volume":"9 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13237443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31547/bct-2026-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-relapse mortality (NRM) remains a major and often unavoidable adverse event following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), particularly among older adults and patients with multiple comorbidities. Although the hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) is widely used for risk assessment, its predictive performance for NRM is limited, particularly for capturing functional status and physiological reserve. Sarcopenia, a marker of physical frailty and reduced physiological reserve, has recently emerged as a potential prognostic marker in transplant populations. This study aimed to determine whether combining pre-transplant sarcopenia with the HCT-CI improves NRM risk stratification after allo-HSCT. We retrospectively analyzed 95 adult patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT at our institution between May 2017 and December 2024. Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria using standardized assessments of handgrip strength, gait speed, and skeletal muscle mass index. Patients were classified into high-risk (sarcopenia plus HCT-CI ≥ 3) or low-risk (others) groups. Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group showed significantly higher 2-year cumulative incidence of NRM (41.7% vs. 16.1%, p=0.026) and poorer overall survival (33.3% vs. 71.0%, p=0.002). In multivariable analysis, the composite high-risk classification independently predicted NRM (subdistribution hazard ratio 3.48, 95% confidence interval, 1.26-9.64, p=0.018), while sarcopenia or HCT-CI alone did not. These findings suggest that integrating physical reserve and comorbidity potentially enhances NRM risk stratification after allo-HSCT. The composite index may provide a practical framework to help optimize conditioning intensity, guide prehabilitation strategies, and personalize post-transplant management.

基于移植前肌肉减少症和HCT-CI的异基因造血干细胞移植后非复发死亡率风险分层。
非复发死亡率(NRM)仍然是同种异体造血干细胞移植(allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, alloo - hsct)后不可避免的主要不良事件,特别是在老年人和有多种合并症的患者中。虽然造血细胞移植特异性共病指数(HCT-CI)被广泛用于风险评估,但其对NRM的预测能力有限,特别是在捕捉功能状态和生理储备方面。骨骼肌减少症是身体虚弱和生理储备减少的标志,最近已成为移植人群的潜在预后标志。本研究旨在确定移植前肌肉减少症联合HCT-CI是否能改善同种异体造血干细胞移植后的NRM风险分层。我们回顾性分析了2017年5月至2024年12月期间在我院接受首次同种异体造血干细胞移植的95名成年患者。骨骼肌减少症是根据2019年亚洲骨骼肌减少症工作组的标准诊断的,该标准使用了对握力、步态速度和骨骼肌质量指数的标准化评估。将患者分为高危组(肌少症合并HCT-CI≥3)和低危组(其他组)。与低危组相比,高危组2年累计NRM发生率显著增高(41.7% vs. 16.1%, p=0.026),总生存率显著降低(33.3% vs. 71.0%, p=0.002)。在多变量分析中,复合高危分类独立预测NRM(亚分布风险比3.48,95%置信区间1.26-9.64,p=0.018),而肌少症或HCT-CI单独预测不出NRM。这些研究结果表明,将身体储备和合并症结合起来可能会增加异体造血干细胞移植后NRM的风险分层。该综合指数可为优化调节强度、指导康复策略和个性化移植后管理提供实用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书