Engaging intersectionality in medical education.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.81766
Princess Eze, Sarah Forgie, Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika, Marghalara Rashid
{"title":"Engaging intersectionality in medical education.","authors":"Princess Eze, Sarah Forgie, Philomina Okeke-Ihejirika, Marghalara Rashid","doi":"10.36834/cmej.81766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical education (ME) plays a critical role in shaping future healthcare providers; however, systemic inequities persist due to biases embedded in both the formal and hidden curricula. The hidden curriculum-unspoken values, norms, and structural inequalities-reinforces implicit biases that influence professional identity formation, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes. This theoretical paper examines how overlapping social identities can shape health experiences and access to care, and establishes a foundation for tackling systemic inequalities by advocating for the integration of an intersectional framework into ME. As healthcare institutions increasingly focus on diversity and inclusion, we aim to demonstrate that integrating intersectionality theory into ME is a timely and necessary step towards training physicians to meet the needs of diverse patient populations and reduce care disparities. We highlight how the absence of intersectional perspectives in medical training results in narrow clinical frameworks, reduced cultural competency, and the perpetuation of health disparities through the hidden curriculum. Furthermore, we outline practical strategies for embedding intersectionality into ME, such as building an intersectional curriculum, incorporating diverse case scenarios, and establishing institutional task forces. Despite potential challenges, such as resistance to change and resource constraints, implementing intersectionality in ME remains essential and can be attainable through institutional commitment and collaborative approaches. By using intersectionality as a guiding framework, ME can better prepare future healthcare providers to deliver equitable patient centered care while reducing the systemic disparities in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"17 2","pages":"80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical education (ME) plays a critical role in shaping future healthcare providers; however, systemic inequities persist due to biases embedded in both the formal and hidden curricula. The hidden curriculum-unspoken values, norms, and structural inequalities-reinforces implicit biases that influence professional identity formation, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes. This theoretical paper examines how overlapping social identities can shape health experiences and access to care, and establishes a foundation for tackling systemic inequalities by advocating for the integration of an intersectional framework into ME. As healthcare institutions increasingly focus on diversity and inclusion, we aim to demonstrate that integrating intersectionality theory into ME is a timely and necessary step towards training physicians to meet the needs of diverse patient populations and reduce care disparities. We highlight how the absence of intersectional perspectives in medical training results in narrow clinical frameworks, reduced cultural competency, and the perpetuation of health disparities through the hidden curriculum. Furthermore, we outline practical strategies for embedding intersectionality into ME, such as building an intersectional curriculum, incorporating diverse case scenarios, and establishing institutional task forces. Despite potential challenges, such as resistance to change and resource constraints, implementing intersectionality in ME remains essential and can be attainable through institutional commitment and collaborative approaches. By using intersectionality as a guiding framework, ME can better prepare future healthcare providers to deliver equitable patient centered care while reducing the systemic disparities in healthcare.

参与医学教育的交叉性。
医学教育(ME)在塑造未来的医疗保健提供者中发挥着关键作用;然而,由于存在于正式课程和隐性课程中的偏见,系统性不平等仍然存在。隐性课程——不言而喻的价值观、规范和结构性不平等——强化了影响职业身份形成、临床决策和患者结果的隐性偏见。这篇理论论文探讨了重叠的社会身份如何塑造健康经历和获得护理的机会,并通过倡导将交叉框架整合到ME中,为解决系统性不平等奠定了基础。随着医疗机构越来越关注多样性和包容性,我们的目标是证明将交叉性理论整合到ME中是培训医生以满足不同患者群体的需求并减少护理差异的及时和必要的步骤。我们强调医学培训中缺乏交叉视角如何导致狭窄的临床框架,降低文化能力,以及通过隐藏课程使健康差距永续存在。此外,我们概述了将交叉性嵌入ME的实用策略,例如建立一个交叉性课程,结合不同的案例场景,并建立机构工作队。尽管存在潜在的挑战,例如对变革的抵制和资源限制,但在ME中实施交叉性仍然是必不可少的,并且可以通过机构承诺和协作方法来实现。通过使用交叉性作为指导框架,ME可以更好地为未来的医疗保健提供者做好准备,提供公平的以患者为中心的护理,同时减少医疗保健中的系统性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书