Developing a national competency framework for pediatric hospital medicine in Canada using the Delphi method.

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.80136
Peter Vetere, Catharine M Walsh, Ali Al Maawali, Allan Puran, Tanya N Beran, Zia Bismilla, Suzette Cooke
{"title":"Developing a national competency framework for pediatric hospital medicine in Canada using the Delphi method.","authors":"Peter Vetere, Catharine M Walsh, Ali Al Maawali, Allan Puran, Tanya N Beran, Zia Bismilla, Suzette Cooke","doi":"10.36834/cmej.80136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over the past three decades, the field of Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) has expanded rapidly in North America in response to the increasing complexity and acuity of the pediatric inpatient population. While 78 fellowship programs and a published PHM Core Competencies framework exist in the United States, Canadian fellowship programs lack a national competency framework to guide curriculum and practice. This absence creates uncertainty in defining the scope of practice and training expectations for PHM in Canada. The purpose of this study was to define this scope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Delphi methodology, a national panel of experts in PHM iteratively rated potential competencies, on a 5-point scale, to determine their priority for inclusion. Responses were analyzed after each round. Competencies that were assigned a rating of three or less by ≥80% of the panelists were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining competencies were re-sent to panelists for further ratings until consensus was reached, defined as Cronbach's α ≥0.95 and after a minimum of two survey rounds. At the conclusion of the Delphi process, competencies where ≥80% of the panelists assigned a rating of ≥4 were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two rounds of the Delphi process were required to reach consensus. Thirty-five panelists completed both survey rounds. The panelists represented 13 Canadian pediatric tertiary care centers and five community hospitals. Of 176 initial competencies, 109 PHM competencies achieved consensus, spanning the seven CanMEDS roles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to define competencies for PHM in Canada. The competencies identified provide a framework for PHM fellowship program directors to shape local curricula. The results may also be used to inform the development of comprehensive national PHM fellowship curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"17 2","pages":"19-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.80136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the past three decades, the field of Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) has expanded rapidly in North America in response to the increasing complexity and acuity of the pediatric inpatient population. While 78 fellowship programs and a published PHM Core Competencies framework exist in the United States, Canadian fellowship programs lack a national competency framework to guide curriculum and practice. This absence creates uncertainty in defining the scope of practice and training expectations for PHM in Canada. The purpose of this study was to define this scope.

Methods: Using Delphi methodology, a national panel of experts in PHM iteratively rated potential competencies, on a 5-point scale, to determine their priority for inclusion. Responses were analyzed after each round. Competencies that were assigned a rating of three or less by ≥80% of the panelists were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining competencies were re-sent to panelists for further ratings until consensus was reached, defined as Cronbach's α ≥0.95 and after a minimum of two survey rounds. At the conclusion of the Delphi process, competencies where ≥80% of the panelists assigned a rating of ≥4 were included.

Results: Two rounds of the Delphi process were required to reach consensus. Thirty-five panelists completed both survey rounds. The panelists represented 13 Canadian pediatric tertiary care centers and five community hospitals. Of 176 initial competencies, 109 PHM competencies achieved consensus, spanning the seven CanMEDS roles.

Conclusion: This is the first study to define competencies for PHM in Canada. The competencies identified provide a framework for PHM fellowship program directors to shape local curricula. The results may also be used to inform the development of comprehensive national PHM fellowship curricula.

利用德尔菲法为加拿大儿科医院医学开发国家能力框架。
背景:在过去的三十年中,儿科医院医学(PHM)领域在北美迅速扩张,以应对儿科住院人口日益增加的复杂性和敏锐度。虽然美国有78个奖学金项目和公布的PHM核心能力框架,但加拿大的奖学金项目缺乏指导课程和实践的国家能力框架。这种缺失给加拿大PHM的实践范围和培训期望的定义带来了不确定性。本研究的目的是确定这一范围。方法:采用德尔菲法,PHM的国家专家小组以5分制对潜在能力进行迭代评估,以确定其纳入的优先级。在每一轮结束后对反馈进行分析。被≥80%的小组成员评分为3分或更低的能力被从后续轮次中剔除。剩余的能力被重新发送给小组成员进行进一步评级,直到达成共识,定义为Cronbach's α≥0.95,并且至少经过两轮调查。在德尔菲过程结束时,≥80%的小组成员被分配了≥4级的能力被包括在内。结果:需要两轮德尔菲过程才能达成共识。35名小组成员完成了两轮调查。小组成员代表了13个加拿大儿科三级护理中心和5个社区医院。在176个初始胜任力中,109个PHM胜任力达成了共识,跨越了CanMEDS的7个角色。结论:这是加拿大第一个定义PHM能力的研究。所确定的能力为PHM奖学金项目主任制定当地课程提供了一个框架。研究结果也可用于制定全面的国家PHM奖学金课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书