Effectiveness and Safety of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1155/tbj/9456822
Reza Samiee, Mohammadamin Kharaghani, Amirhossein Shahsavand, Shayan Forghani, Mehrdad Mozafar, Negin Safari Dehnavi, Zahra Ghanbari, Luca Nicosia, Fatemeh Jafari
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)","authors":"Reza Samiee,&nbsp;Mohammadamin Kharaghani,&nbsp;Amirhossein Shahsavand,&nbsp;Shayan Forghani,&nbsp;Mehrdad Mozafar,&nbsp;Negin Safari Dehnavi,&nbsp;Zahra Ghanbari,&nbsp;Luca Nicosia,&nbsp;Fatemeh Jafari","doi":"10.1155/tbj/9456822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To synthesize the available evidence on the oncologic outcomes, toxicity, and cosmesis of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception until July 12, 2025. We included studies of DCIS patients treated with BCS followed by HF-WBI (fraction size &gt; 2.0 Gy). Both comparative studies (against conventional fractionation [CF]) and single-arm studies reporting outcomes for HF-WBI alone were included. Pooled incidence rates for outcomes from single-arm studies and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) from the limited comparative studies were calculated using random-effects models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nineteen studies were included. Local control and overall survival were excellent and equivalent between HF-WBI and CF-WBI. The pooled HR for local recurrence comparing ultrahypofractionation to CF was 0.89 (95% CI 0.64–1.24). HF-WBI significantly reduced the odds of acute dermatitis (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13–0.35). Late toxicities were infrequent (e.g., telangiectasia: 2%, 95% CI 0%–5%). Good/excellent cosmesis was reported in 90% (95% CI 84%–94%) of patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HF-WBI is a safe and effective treatment for DCIS, achieving oncologic outcomes equivalent to CF while offering improved tolerability, reduced acute skin toxicity, and excellent cosmetic results. These benefits, combined with increased convenience and potential cost savings, support the integration of HF-WBI into standard practice for DCIS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbj/9456822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbj/9456822","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To synthesize the available evidence on the oncologic outcomes, toxicity, and cosmesis of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception until July 12, 2025. We included studies of DCIS patients treated with BCS followed by HF-WBI (fraction size > 2.0 Gy). Both comparative studies (against conventional fractionation [CF]) and single-arm studies reporting outcomes for HF-WBI alone were included. Pooled incidence rates for outcomes from single-arm studies and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) from the limited comparative studies were calculated using random-effects models.

Results

Nineteen studies were included. Local control and overall survival were excellent and equivalent between HF-WBI and CF-WBI. The pooled HR for local recurrence comparing ultrahypofractionation to CF was 0.89 (95% CI 0.64–1.24). HF-WBI significantly reduced the odds of acute dermatitis (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13–0.35). Late toxicities were infrequent (e.g., telangiectasia: 2%, 95% CI 0%–5%). Good/excellent cosmesis was reported in 90% (95% CI 84%–94%) of patients.

Conclusion

HF-WBI is a safe and effective treatment for DCIS, achieving oncologic outcomes equivalent to CF while offering improved tolerability, reduced acute skin toxicity, and excellent cosmetic results. These benefits, combined with increased convenience and potential cost savings, support the integration of HF-WBI into standard practice for DCIS.

Abstract Image

导管原位癌(DCIS)低分割放疗的有效性和安全性。
目的:综合现有证据,探讨保乳手术(BCS)后导管原位癌(DCIS)患者低分割全乳照射(HF-WBI)的肿瘤预后、毒性和美容效果。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed, Embase和Web of Science的搜索时间从成立到2025年7月12日。我们纳入了DCIS患者在BCS治疗后进行HF-WBI(分数为> 2.0 Gy)的研究。比较研究(对比传统分馏[CF])和单独报道HF-WBI结果的单组研究均被纳入。使用随机效应模型计算单组研究结果的合并发生率和有限比较研究的合并风险比(hr)或优势比(ORs)。结果:共纳入19项研究。局部控制和总生存在HF-WBI和CF-WBI之间表现优异且相当。与CF相比,超低分割局部复发的总HR为0.89 (95% CI 0.64-1.24)。HF-WBI显著降低急性皮炎的发生率(OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13-0.35)。晚期毒性不常见(例如,毛细血管扩张:2%,95% CI 0%-5%)。90% (95% CI 84%-94%)的患者美容效果良好。结论:HF-WBI是一种安全有效的DCIS治疗方法,在改善耐受性、降低急性皮肤毒性和良好美容效果的同时,达到了与CF相当的肿瘤预后。这些优点,加上增加的便利性和潜在的成本节约,支持将HF-WBI集成到DCIS的标准实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书