Still invisible? Legal and ethical treatment of intersex individuals in China.

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2026-06-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsag018
Meng Wang, Yann Joly
{"title":"Still invisible? Legal and ethical treatment of intersex individuals in China.","authors":"Meng Wang, Yann Joly","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsag018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores the legal, social, and ethical challenges faced by intersex individuals in China, a population estimated to number in the millions but still largely invisible in national laws and public discourse. Drawing on recent international human rights developments and comparative legal analysis, the paper critically examines China's legal and medical frameworks through the lens of intersex rights. It highlights how entrenched binary conceptions of sex and gender deeply rooted in Confucian traditions, and reflected in Chinese administrative, medical, and legal systems, lead to widespread discrimination, non-consensual medical interventions, and structural exclusion of intersex individuals. The authors argue that despite generic constitutional and civil guarantees of equality, bodily integrity, and informed consent, intersex persons remain insufficiently protected due to the absence of targeted legislation and interpretive guidance. The article proposes incremental yet concrete reforms such as deferring non-urgent medical interventions, improving psychosocial support, introducing neutral terminology, and developing best-practice medical guidelines as viable steps toward greater inclusion. By examining relevant international and regional practices, including developments in Malta, Australia, and Hong Kong, the paper advocates for a post-binary legal approach that affirms intersex individuals' dignity, autonomy, and right to recognition in Chinese law and society.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"lsag018"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsag018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the legal, social, and ethical challenges faced by intersex individuals in China, a population estimated to number in the millions but still largely invisible in national laws and public discourse. Drawing on recent international human rights developments and comparative legal analysis, the paper critically examines China's legal and medical frameworks through the lens of intersex rights. It highlights how entrenched binary conceptions of sex and gender deeply rooted in Confucian traditions, and reflected in Chinese administrative, medical, and legal systems, lead to widespread discrimination, non-consensual medical interventions, and structural exclusion of intersex individuals. The authors argue that despite generic constitutional and civil guarantees of equality, bodily integrity, and informed consent, intersex persons remain insufficiently protected due to the absence of targeted legislation and interpretive guidance. The article proposes incremental yet concrete reforms such as deferring non-urgent medical interventions, improving psychosocial support, introducing neutral terminology, and developing best-practice medical guidelines as viable steps toward greater inclusion. By examining relevant international and regional practices, including developments in Malta, Australia, and Hong Kong, the paper advocates for a post-binary legal approach that affirms intersex individuals' dignity, autonomy, and right to recognition in Chinese law and society.

还是看不见吗?中国双性人的法律和伦理待遇。
这篇文章探讨了中国阴阳人所面临的法律、社会和伦理挑战。阴阳人的数量估计有数百万,但在国家法律和公共话语中仍然很大程度上被忽视。借鉴最近的国际人权发展和比较法分析,本文通过双性人权利的视角批判性地审视了中国的法律和医疗框架。它强调了根深蒂固的二元性观念是如何深深植根于儒家传统,并反映在中国的行政、医疗和法律制度中,导致了广泛的歧视、非自愿的医疗干预和对双性人的结构性排斥。提交人认为,尽管一般宪法和公民保障平等、身体完整和知情同意,但由于缺乏有针对性的立法和解释性指导,双性人仍然得不到充分保护。文章提出了渐进而具体的改革,如推迟非紧急医疗干预,改善社会心理支持,引入中性术语,制定最佳实践医疗指南,作为实现更大包容性的可行步骤。通过研究相关的国际和地区实践,包括马耳他、澳大利亚和香港的发展,本文倡导一种后二元性的法律途径,以肯定阴阳人在中国法律和社会中的尊严、自主权和被承认的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书