Ryan Good, Juliana Wilson, Joshua C Kaine, Vijay J Daniels, Janeve Desy, Joshua Lloyd, Gillian Sheppard, Linden Kolbenson, Irene Wy Ma, Arthur Au, Paul Olszynski
{"title":"The development of two Point of Care Ultrasound stations for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in undergraduate medical education.","authors":"Ryan Good, Juliana Wilson, Joshua C Kaine, Vijay J Daniels, Janeve Desy, Joshua Lloyd, Gillian Sheppard, Linden Kolbenson, Irene Wy Ma, Arthur Au, Paul Olszynski","doi":"10.36834/cmej.81229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable clinical skill that improves clinical care but requires substantial training. Validated assessment tools provide empirical evidence regarding trainee performance while also informing program-level evaluation. We developed two POCUS-specific stations for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to assess skill acquisition and inform best practices in undergraduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary group of POCUS educators identified two POCUS applications (pleural effusion and abdominal free fluid) well suited for the undergraduate level. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop POCUS-application-specific skill checklists and global rating scale. Two medical programs piloted the stations to inform reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across two sites, 46 and 41 students participated in the pleural effusion and abdominal free fluid stations respectively. Checklists showed high internal reliability, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-0.93) for the pleural effusion station and 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.95) for the abdominal free fluid station. Krippendorff's alpha, a measure of inter-rater reliability, was also equally strong at 0.85 (95% CI 0.43-0.94) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.50-0.94) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both POCUS OSCE stations demonstrated good internal and inter-rater reliability. Deployment of these OSCE stations at programs with integrated POCUS curricula may help refine programming and training expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"17 2","pages":"62-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13242155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.81229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable clinical skill that improves clinical care but requires substantial training. Validated assessment tools provide empirical evidence regarding trainee performance while also informing program-level evaluation. We developed two POCUS-specific stations for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to assess skill acquisition and inform best practices in undergraduate medical education.
Methods: A multidisciplinary group of POCUS educators identified two POCUS applications (pleural effusion and abdominal free fluid) well suited for the undergraduate level. A modified Delphi approach was used to develop POCUS-application-specific skill checklists and global rating scale. Two medical programs piloted the stations to inform reliability.
Results: Across two sites, 46 and 41 students participated in the pleural effusion and abdominal free fluid stations respectively. Checklists showed high internal reliability, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-0.93) for the pleural effusion station and 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.95) for the abdominal free fluid station. Krippendorff's alpha, a measure of inter-rater reliability, was also equally strong at 0.85 (95% CI 0.43-0.94) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.50-0.94) respectively.
Conclusion: Both POCUS OSCE stations demonstrated good internal and inter-rater reliability. Deployment of these OSCE stations at programs with integrated POCUS curricula may help refine programming and training expectations.
导读:即时超声(POCUS)是一项有价值的临床技能,可以改善临床护理,但需要大量的培训。经过验证的评估工具提供了有关培训生绩效的经验证据,同时也为项目层面的评估提供了信息。我们为客观结构化临床检查(oses)开发了两个针对pocuss的站点,以评估技能获得并告知本科医学教育的最佳实践。方法:一个多学科的POCUS教育者小组确定了两种POCUS应用(胸腔积液和腹腔游离液)非常适合本科水平。采用改进的德尔菲法制定了特定于pocus应用的技能清单和全球评定量表。两个医疗项目对电台进行了试点,以确保信息的可靠性。结果:在两个地点,分别有46名和41名学生参加了胸腔积液和腹部游离液站。检查表显示出较高的内部可靠性,胸膜积液站的Cronbach's alpha为0.85 (95% CI 0.71-0.93),腹部游离液站的Cronbach's alpha为0.87 (95% CI 0.74-0.95)。Krippendorff's alpha,一种评估间信度的方法,也同样强大,分别为0.85 (95% CI 0.43-0.94)和0.83 (95% CI 0.50-0.94)。结论:两个POCUS OSCE站具有良好的内部和内部可靠性。在具有综合POCUS课程的方案中部署这些欧安组织台站可能有助于改进规划和培训期望。