Association Between Integrated Treatment Services and Access to Detoxification and MOUD Across US Treatment Facilities.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fares Qeadan, Falak Choudry, Rose Thornquist
{"title":"Association Between Integrated Treatment Services and Access to Detoxification and MOUD Across US Treatment Facilities.","authors":"Fares Qeadan, Falak Choudry, Rose Thornquist","doi":"10.1007/s11414-026-10003-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated treatment services for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are recommended best practice, yet their relationship with facility-level provision of detoxification and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) is not well understood. The researchers analyzed 2021-2023 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS) data from 49,623 facilities offering any substance use services. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between integrated services and availability of detoxification and MOUD, adjusting for facility characteristics and Chronic Care Model elements. Primary treatment focus (substance use, mental health, mixed) was evaluated as an effect modifier. Overall, 61.2% of facilities offered integrated services, 21.2% provided detoxification, and 56.0% provided MOUD. Among substance use-focused facilities, integrated services were associated with higher odds of offering detox (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.37) and MOUD (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.56). Among mixed-focus facilities, integrated services were associated with higher odds of MOUD (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51) but not detoxification. Among mental health-focused facilities, integrated services were associated with lower odds of detoxification (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.53) and did not predict MOUD availability. Facility type, ownership, and Chronic Care Model elements, including delivery system redesign, self-management support, and clinical information systems, were strong independent predictors of both outcomes. Integrated services may be associated with greater access to detoxification and MOUD in substance use-focused settings but appear insufficient within mental health-focused facilities; efforts to strengthen integrated care should account for facility focus and infrastructure capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":" ","pages":"574-589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-026-10003-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated treatment services for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are recommended best practice, yet their relationship with facility-level provision of detoxification and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs) is not well understood. The researchers analyzed 2021-2023 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS) data from 49,623 facilities offering any substance use services. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between integrated services and availability of detoxification and MOUD, adjusting for facility characteristics and Chronic Care Model elements. Primary treatment focus (substance use, mental health, mixed) was evaluated as an effect modifier. Overall, 61.2% of facilities offered integrated services, 21.2% provided detoxification, and 56.0% provided MOUD. Among substance use-focused facilities, integrated services were associated with higher odds of offering detox (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.37) and MOUD (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.56). Among mixed-focus facilities, integrated services were associated with higher odds of MOUD (aOR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51) but not detoxification. Among mental health-focused facilities, integrated services were associated with lower odds of detoxification (aOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.53) and did not predict MOUD availability. Facility type, ownership, and Chronic Care Model elements, including delivery system redesign, self-management support, and clinical information systems, were strong independent predictors of both outcomes. Integrated services may be associated with greater access to detoxification and MOUD in substance use-focused settings but appear insufficient within mental health-focused facilities; efforts to strengthen integrated care should account for facility focus and infrastructure capacity.

综合治疗服务和获得戒毒和mod在美国治疗设施之间的关系。
对同时发生的精神健康和物质使用障碍的综合治疗服务被推荐为最佳做法,但它们与设施一级提供阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUDs)的解毒和药物治疗的关系尚不清楚。研究人员分析了2021-2023年国家物质使用和心理健康服务调查(N-SUMHSS)数据,这些数据来自49,623家提供任何物质使用服务的机构。多变量逻辑回归模型检验了综合服务与戒毒和mod可用性之间的关系,调整了设施特征和慢性护理模型要素。主要治疗重点(药物使用、精神健康、混合)作为效果调节剂进行评价。总体而言,61.2%的机构提供综合服务,21.2%提供戒毒服务,56.0%提供mod服务。在以物质使用为重点的设施中,综合服务与提供排毒(调整比值比[aOR] = 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.37)和mod (aOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.34-1.56)相关。在混合中心设施中,综合服务与较高的mod发生率相关(aOR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.28-1.51),但与戒毒无关。在以精神卫生为重点的设施中,综合服务与较低的戒毒几率相关(aOR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.53),并且不能预测mod的可用性。设施类型、所有权和慢性护理模式要素,包括交付系统重新设计、自我管理支持和临床信息系统,是两种结果的强大独立预测因子。在以药物使用为重点的环境中,综合服务可能与更容易获得戒毒和mod有关,但在以精神卫生为重点的设施中似乎不足;加强综合护理的努力应考虑到设施重点和基础设施能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research
Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal examines the organization, financing, delivery and outcomes of behavioral health services (i.e., alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders), providing practical and empirical contributions to and explaining the implications for the broader behavioral health field. Each issue includes an overview of contemporary concerns and recent developments in behavioral health policy and management through research articles, policy perspectives, commentaries, brief reports, and book reviews. This journal is the official publication of the National Council for Behavioral Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书