Evaluating diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder.

IF 2.8 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1037/adb0001166

Neil Ni, Samuel B Jones, Jonathan David, Astrid Müller, Melissa M Norberg

{"title":"Evaluating diagnostic criteria for compulsive buying-shopping disorder.","authors":"Neil Ni, Samuel B Jones, Jonathan David, Astrid Müller, Melissa M Norberg","doi":"10.1037/adb0001166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) has over 100 years of clinical history, its nosology remains a topic of debate. In 2021, Müller and colleagues published a set of diagnostic criteria for the disorder based on a Delphi consensus study. The present study evaluated these criteria among 51 participants who reported a lived experience of CBSD and examined whether their experiences aligned with the components model of addiction.Method: Participants were interviewed using a semistructured interview. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis.Results: Most participants reported a persistent and excessive pattern of buying/shopping, diminished control over buying/shopping, buying/shopping for mood modification, experiencing clinically significant distress and impairment, and continuation despite negative consequences. We recommend these symptoms be considered essential features of CBSD, along with ruling out other explanations for the buying/shopping behavior. Intrusive thoughts and preoccupation with buying/shopping, tolerance, and withdrawal were less common, and we recommend these be considered additional, but not required, features of CBSD.Conclusions: Given these findings and evidence that tolerance and withdrawal are not necessary or sufficient components of addiction, we recommend that CBSD be considered a behavioral addiction. Future research should use these empirically informed criteria to develop and validate a structured diagnostic interview to be used in field studies to formally recognize CBSD as a mental disorder. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) has over 100 years of clinical history, its nosology remains a topic of debate. In 2021, Müller and colleagues published a set of diagnostic criteria for the disorder based on a Delphi consensus study. The present study evaluated these criteria among 51 participants who reported a lived experience of CBSD and examined whether their experiences aligned with the components model of addiction.

Method: Participants were interviewed using a semistructured interview. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis.

Results: Most participants reported a persistent and excessive pattern of buying/shopping, diminished control over buying/shopping, buying/shopping for mood modification, experiencing clinically significant distress and impairment, and continuation despite negative consequences. We recommend these symptoms be considered essential features of CBSD, along with ruling out other explanations for the buying/shopping behavior. Intrusive thoughts and preoccupation with buying/shopping, tolerance, and withdrawal were less common, and we recommend these be considered additional, but not required, features of CBSD.

Conclusions: Given these findings and evidence that tolerance and withdrawal are not necessary or sufficient components of addiction, we recommend that CBSD be considered a behavioral addiction. Future research should use these empirically informed criteria to develop and validate a structured diagnostic interview to be used in field studies to formally recognize CBSD as a mental disorder. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估强迫性购物障碍的诊断标准。

目的：虽然强迫性购物障碍（CBSD）有100多年的临床历史，但其分类学仍然是一个有争议的话题。2021年，m勒及其同事根据德尔菲共识研究发表了一套诊断标准。目前的研究评估了51名参与者的这些标准，他们报告了CBSD的生活经历，并检查了他们的经历是否符合成瘾的成分模型。方法：采用半结构化访谈法对参与者进行访谈。使用定向内容分析分析转录本。结果：大多数参与者报告了持续和过度的购买/购物模式，对购买/购物的控制力减弱，购买/购物以调节情绪，经历临床显着的痛苦和损害，尽管有负面后果，但仍在继续。我们建议将这些症状视为CBSD的基本特征，同时排除对购买/购物行为的其他解释。侵入性的想法和对购买/购物的专注，宽容和戒断不太常见，我们建议这些被认为是额外的，但不是必需的，CBSD的特征。结论：鉴于这些发现和证据表明耐受性和戒断不是成瘾的必要或充分组成部分，我们建议将CBSD视为一种行为成瘾。未来的研究应该使用这些经验标准来开发和验证一个结构化的诊断访谈，用于实地研究，以正式承认CBSD是一种精神障碍。（PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA，版权所有）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Multiple-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

11.80%

发文量

165

期刊介绍： Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.