Evaluating Patient Safety Competency Acquisition Through Clinical Simulation: Development and Application of the Clinical Simulation Learning Patient Safety Scale.
Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Daniel García-Gutiérrez, Manuel Romero-Saldaña, Beatriz Rodríguez Diez-Caballero, Rafael González-Moret, Miguel Picher-Martínez, Cristina García-Salido
{"title":"Evaluating Patient Safety Competency Acquisition Through Clinical Simulation: Development and Application of the Clinical Simulation Learning Patient Safety Scale.","authors":"Estel la Ramírez-Baraldes, Daniel García-Gutiérrez, Manuel Romero-Saldaña, Beatriz Rodríguez Diez-Caballero, Rafael González-Moret, Miguel Picher-Martínez, Cristina García-Salido","doi":"10.1155/nrp/7615766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation is recognized as an effective method for integrating theory and practice, improving safety competence in nursing professionals and patient care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and psychometrically validate the Clinical Simulation Learning Patient Safety Scale (CSL Patient Safety Scale), a self-administered instrument for undergraduate nursing students that assesses patient safety competencies acquired through clinical simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter study was designed in two Spanish universities, with 450 students and a final sample of 208.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire showed a high content validity (Aiken's V > 0.8) and internal reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.832) with acceptable reliability for each factor separately (<i>α</i> = 0.877 for Factor 1 and <i>α</i> = 0.714 for Factor 2) and did not present significant variations in sensitivity analysis (McDonald's <i>ω</i> = 0.812). Intraobserver reliability was high (ICC = 0.959, 95% CI = 0.922-0.978).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The questionnaire demonstrated excellent validity and reliability, consolidating the Patient Safety Scale (CSL) as an effective tool for assessing patient safety competencies through clinical simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"7615766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/7615766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Simulation is recognized as an effective method for integrating theory and practice, improving safety competence in nursing professionals and patient care.
Objectives: To develop and psychometrically validate the Clinical Simulation Learning Patient Safety Scale (CSL Patient Safety Scale), a self-administered instrument for undergraduate nursing students that assesses patient safety competencies acquired through clinical simulation.
Methods: A multicenter study was designed in two Spanish universities, with 450 students and a final sample of 208.
Results: The questionnaire showed a high content validity (Aiken's V > 0.8) and internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.832) with acceptable reliability for each factor separately (α = 0.877 for Factor 1 and α = 0.714 for Factor 2) and did not present significant variations in sensitivity analysis (McDonald's ω = 0.812). Intraobserver reliability was high (ICC = 0.959, 95% CI = 0.922-0.978).
Conclusions: The questionnaire demonstrated excellent validity and reliability, consolidating the Patient Safety Scale (CSL) as an effective tool for assessing patient safety competencies through clinical simulation.