A pilot randomized clinical trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral therapy adjunct to support benzodiazepine tapering among primary care patients coprescribed benzodiazepines and opioids.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1037/adb0001164
Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Michael Otto, Allison Metts, Maria Hanano, Larissa J Mooney
{"title":"A pilot randomized clinical trial evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral therapy adjunct to support benzodiazepine tapering among primary care patients coprescribed benzodiazepines and opioids.","authors":"Kate Wolitzky-Taylor, Michael Otto, Allison Metts, Maria Hanano, Larissa J Mooney","doi":"10.1037/adb0001164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Benzodiazepine (BZ) use concerns have escalated in the wake of the opioid crisis, including increased overdose risk from co-use of BZ and opioids. Research evidence to inform clinical management of this issue is currently lacking.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This pilot trial examined acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention approach to reduce BZ use in adults who simultaneously take opioids. Forty participants with concomitant BZ and opioid prescriptions and significant anxiety symptoms were randomized to BZ taper with a cognitive-behavioral therapy protocol (BZT + CBT; <i>n</i> = 20) or BZ taper with a health education control (BZT + HE; <i>n</i> = 20).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both conditions were rated as logical (<i>M</i><sub>BZT</sub> <sub>+ CBT</sub> = 6.20; M<sub>BZT + HE</sub> = 7.29) and useful (<i>M</i><sub>BZT + CBT</sub> = 6.78; MBZT + HE = 5.64), but treatment engagement was modest but similar between conditions. Approximately 60% of participants in both treatment conditions achieved at least a 50% reduction in BZ dose by the 2-month follow-up, reducing the risk of adverse drug-related outcomes. Differences between groups did not reach significance, but effect sizes indicated advantages for BZT + CBT over BZT + HE for anxiety severity at posttreatment (<i>d</i> = 0.86) and follow-up (<i>d</i> = 0.33), with similar findings for pain catastrophizing and anxiety sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The promising effect sizes obtained, along with evidence of adequate feasibility and acceptability, encourage further examination of the BZT + CBT approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":" ","pages":"636-646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13524120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Benzodiazepine (BZ) use concerns have escalated in the wake of the opioid crisis, including increased overdose risk from co-use of BZ and opioids. Research evidence to inform clinical management of this issue is currently lacking.

Method: This pilot trial examined acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy of an intervention approach to reduce BZ use in adults who simultaneously take opioids. Forty participants with concomitant BZ and opioid prescriptions and significant anxiety symptoms were randomized to BZ taper with a cognitive-behavioral therapy protocol (BZT + CBT; n = 20) or BZ taper with a health education control (BZT + HE; n = 20).

Results: Both conditions were rated as logical (MBZT + CBT = 6.20; MBZT + HE = 7.29) and useful (MBZT + CBT = 6.78; MBZT + HE = 5.64), but treatment engagement was modest but similar between conditions. Approximately 60% of participants in both treatment conditions achieved at least a 50% reduction in BZ dose by the 2-month follow-up, reducing the risk of adverse drug-related outcomes. Differences between groups did not reach significance, but effect sizes indicated advantages for BZT + CBT over BZT + HE for anxiety severity at posttreatment (d = 0.86) and follow-up (d = 0.33), with similar findings for pain catastrophizing and anxiety sensitivity.

Conclusions: The promising effect sizes obtained, along with evidence of adequate feasibility and acceptability, encourage further examination of the BZT + CBT approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

一项试点随机临床试验评估的可行性,可接受性和初步疗效的认知行为治疗辅助,以支持苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物的初级保健患者减少苯二氮卓。
目的:在阿片类药物危机之后,苯二氮卓类药物(BZ)的使用问题已经升级,包括苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物共同使用的过量风险增加。目前缺乏临床管理这一问题的研究证据。方法:本试验考察了同时服用阿片类药物的成年人减少BZ使用的干预方法的可接受性、可行性和初步效果。40名同时服用BZ和阿片类药物并有明显焦虑症状的参与者被随机分为认知行为治疗方案(BZT + CBT, n = 20)或BZ减少与健康教育控制(BZT + HE, n = 20)。结果:两种情况均被评为合乎逻辑(MBZT + CBT = 6.20; MBZT + HE = 7.29)和有用(MBZT + CBT = 6.78; MBZT + HE = 5.64),但两种情况的治疗投入程度一般,但相似。在2个月的随访中,两种治疗条件下约60%的参与者至少减少了50%的BZ剂量,降低了不良药物相关结局的风险。各组之间的差异没有达到显著性,但效应量表明BZT + CBT在治疗后(d = 0.86)和随访时(d = 0.33)的焦虑严重程度优于BZT + HE,在疼痛灾难和焦虑敏感性方面也有类似的发现。结论:获得的有希望的效应量,以及足够的可行性和可接受性的证据,鼓励进一步研究BZT + CBT方法。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书