Caregiver distress explains links between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI:10.1037/fam0001479
Portia Miller, Emily Jones, Hannah Parker, Chelsea Leverett-Ptak, Jamie L Hanson, Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal
{"title":"Caregiver distress explains links between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and adolescent internalizing and externalizing behaviors.","authors":"Portia Miller, Emily Jones, Hannah Parker, Chelsea Leverett-Ptak, Jamie L Hanson, Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal","doi":"10.1037/fam0001479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States is amid an unprecedented adolescent mental health crisis, and adolescents who experience socioeconomic disadvantage are at elevated risk for behavioral problems. Low socioeconomic status (SES) is related to parent distress and is one potential pathway through which disadvantage relates to adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. Empirical support for this pathway is typically based on a single measure of objective SES considered in isolation. However, parents' subjective social status (SSS) also predicts their distress and may, in turn, shape adolescents' problem behaviors. We examine how multiple objective (annual income, monthly income volatility, and educational attainment) and subjective (SSS) markers of SES independently relate to adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems through parent distress using data from 104 parent-adolescent dyads. In mixed-effects models, we observed positive indirect effects of income volatility (within-dyad variation in monthly income) and parent SSS on adolescents' internalizing and externalizing symptoms through parent distress. Gains in monthly income and greater SSS predicted decreased parent distress, which in turn related to fewer adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Indirect effects were independent of annual income, educational attainment, and covariates (marital status, adolescent race, sex, SSS). These findings highlight that temporally (income volatility) and psychologically proximal (parent SSS) aspects of SES may serve as points for intervention to reduce parent distress and support adolescent mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"705-721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13249017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States is amid an unprecedented adolescent mental health crisis, and adolescents who experience socioeconomic disadvantage are at elevated risk for behavioral problems. Low socioeconomic status (SES) is related to parent distress and is one potential pathway through which disadvantage relates to adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. Empirical support for this pathway is typically based on a single measure of objective SES considered in isolation. However, parents' subjective social status (SSS) also predicts their distress and may, in turn, shape adolescents' problem behaviors. We examine how multiple objective (annual income, monthly income volatility, and educational attainment) and subjective (SSS) markers of SES independently relate to adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems through parent distress using data from 104 parent-adolescent dyads. In mixed-effects models, we observed positive indirect effects of income volatility (within-dyad variation in monthly income) and parent SSS on adolescents' internalizing and externalizing symptoms through parent distress. Gains in monthly income and greater SSS predicted decreased parent distress, which in turn related to fewer adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Indirect effects were independent of annual income, educational attainment, and covariates (marital status, adolescent race, sex, SSS). These findings highlight that temporally (income volatility) and psychologically proximal (parent SSS) aspects of SES may serve as points for intervention to reduce parent distress and support adolescent mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

照顾者痛苦解释了客观和主观社会经济地位与青少年内化和外化行为之间的联系。
美国正处于前所未有的青少年心理健康危机之中,处于社会经济劣势的青少年出现行为问题的风险更高。低社会经济地位(SES)与父母痛苦有关,是青少年内化和外化问题的一个潜在途径。对这一途径的经验支持通常基于孤立考虑的客观SES的单一测量。然而,父母的主观社会地位(SSS)也可以预测他们的痛苦,并可能反过来塑造青少年的问题行为。我们使用来自104对父母-青少年的数据,研究了多重客观(年收入、月收入波动和受教育程度)和主观(SSS)的SES标记如何通过父母的痛苦独立地与青少年内化和外化问题相关。在混合效应模型中,我们观察到收入波动(月收入的两倍内变化)和父母的社会支持通过父母的痛苦对青少年的内化和外化症状有积极的间接影响。月收入的增加和更高的SSS预示着父母痛苦的减少,这反过来又与青少年内化和外化症状的减少有关。间接影响独立于年收入、受教育程度和协变量(婚姻状况、青少年种族、性别、SSS)。这些发现强调了社会经济状况的时间(收入波动)和心理近端(父母SSS)方面可以作为干预点,以减少父母的痛苦和支持青少年心理健康。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书