Natalia Olchanski, Christine E Skiro, Kristen Sonon, Sarah Kaus, Ericka C Holmstrand, Elizabeth L Ciemins, John K Cuddeback, Francis R Colangelo, David M Kent
{"title":"Effect of Using Personalized Estimates of Diabetes Risk During Primary Care Visits for People With Prediabetes.","authors":"Natalia Olchanski, Christine E Skiro, Kristen Sonon, Sarah Kaus, Ericka C Holmstrand, Elizabeth L Ciemins, John K Cuddeback, Francis R Colangelo, David M Kent","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of incorporating individualized risk prediction into clinical assessment, decision making, and communication of risk of type 2 diabetes, with and without preventive interventions, in patients with prediabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We integrated a prediction model into the clinical workflow at a U.S. health care organization. We conducted patient and provider focus groups and pre- and post-dissemination surveys among 2500 patients with prediabetes who had primary care visits between May 2018 and December 2019. We compared rates of progression to type 2 diabetes at 3 years between the intervention group and a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who received usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to implementing the predictive model, 41.6% of providers and 63.8% of patients felt confident or very confident in their ability to estimate the risk of progression to diabetes for individual patients. After personalized risk information was made available, this increased to 92.8% for providers and 66.9% for patients. People with prediabetes who had a primary care visit where their care team had access to personal risk of developing type 2 diabetes assessed by the EHR-based prediction model were significantly less likely to progress to diabetes within 3 years, compared to a propensity-score-matched cohort who received usual care in the same health system without individualized risk estimates (19.5% vs. 27.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.042).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Used at the point of care during a primary care visit, the EHR-based diabetes risk calculator helped providers prioritize patients for diabetes preventive interventions, facilitated communication, and improved health outcomes among patients with prediabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"10 Suppl 1","pages":"e70087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13240528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.70087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To assess acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of incorporating individualized risk prediction into clinical assessment, decision making, and communication of risk of type 2 diabetes, with and without preventive interventions, in patients with prediabetes.
Methods: We integrated a prediction model into the clinical workflow at a U.S. health care organization. We conducted patient and provider focus groups and pre- and post-dissemination surveys among 2500 patients with prediabetes who had primary care visits between May 2018 and December 2019. We compared rates of progression to type 2 diabetes at 3 years between the intervention group and a propensity score-matched cohort of patients who received usual care.
Results: Prior to implementing the predictive model, 41.6% of providers and 63.8% of patients felt confident or very confident in their ability to estimate the risk of progression to diabetes for individual patients. After personalized risk information was made available, this increased to 92.8% for providers and 66.9% for patients. People with prediabetes who had a primary care visit where their care team had access to personal risk of developing type 2 diabetes assessed by the EHR-based prediction model were significantly less likely to progress to diabetes within 3 years, compared to a propensity-score-matched cohort who received usual care in the same health system without individualized risk estimates (19.5% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.042).
Conclusions: Used at the point of care during a primary care visit, the EHR-based diabetes risk calculator helped providers prioritize patients for diabetes preventive interventions, facilitated communication, and improved health outcomes among patients with prediabetes.
背景:评估将个体化风险预测纳入糖尿病前期患者的临床评估、决策和2型糖尿病风险沟通的可接受性、可行性和有效性,无论是否采取预防干预措施。方法:我们将一个预测模型整合到美国一家医疗机构的临床工作流程中。我们对2018年5月至2019年12月期间就诊的2500名前驱糖尿病患者进行了患者和提供者焦点小组以及传播前和传播后调查。我们比较了干预组和接受常规护理的倾向评分匹配队列患者3年发展为2型糖尿病的比率。结果:在实施预测模型之前,41.6%的提供者和63.8%的患者对他们估计个别患者进展为糖尿病风险的能力有信心或非常有信心。在提供个性化风险信息后,提供者的这一比例增加到92.8%,患者增加到66.9%。与在同一卫生系统中接受常规护理而没有进行个体化风险评估的倾向评分匹配队列相比,在初级保健就诊的糖尿病前期患者在3年内发展为糖尿病的可能性显著降低(19.5% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.042)。结论:基于ehr的糖尿病风险计算器用于初级保健访问期间的护理点,帮助提供者优先考虑糖尿病预防干预的患者,促进沟通,并改善糖尿病前期患者的健康结果。