Large Language Models for Summarizing Advance Care Planning Information From Goals of Care Notes in the EHR.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Learning Health Systems Pub Date : 2026-05-27 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1002/lrh2.70086
Ninad Ekbote, Melody Akhondzadeh, Ross Graham, John Bell, Delee Glasser, Robert El-Kareh, Andrew Chua, Aaron Boussina, Arin Tai-Seale, Lily Poursoltan, Karandeep Singh, Parag Agnihotri, Ming Tai-Seale
{"title":"Large Language Models for Summarizing Advance Care Planning Information From Goals of Care Notes in the EHR.","authors":"Ninad Ekbote, Melody Akhondzadeh, Ross Graham, John Bell, Delee Glasser, Robert El-Kareh, Andrew Chua, Aaron Boussina, Arin Tai-Seale, Lily Poursoltan, Karandeep Singh, Parag Agnihotri, Ming Tai-Seale","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Embedding systematic, structured data extraction within electronic health records (EHR) is vital for improved real-time insights into care delivery. This study evaluates the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) to extract structured advance care planning (ACP) information from unstructured Goals of Care (GoC) clinical notes in the EHR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A sample of 100 de-identified GoC notes was manually annotated by clinicians across four ACP categories: Patient Priorities, Code Status, Decision Maker, and Documentation. Two LLMs (Mistral 24.07 and LLaMA 3.1) were prompted to extract structured outputs without domain-specific fine-tuning. Model outputs were compared to human annotations using cosine similarity of BioBERT embeddings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mistral 24.07 achieved high semantic similarity in Code Status (0.814), Documentation (0.781), and Patient Priorities (0.770), but lower alignment in Decision Maker (0.609).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLMs can effectively extract structured ACP information, particularly in well-documented categories, suggesting potential for scalable, data-driven feedback loops that improve the provision of care. However, accuracy challenges remain, and further refinement is needed for nuanced qualitative content categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"10 Suppl 1","pages":"e70086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13240055/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.70086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Embedding systematic, structured data extraction within electronic health records (EHR) is vital for improved real-time insights into care delivery. This study evaluates the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) to extract structured advance care planning (ACP) information from unstructured Goals of Care (GoC) clinical notes in the EHR.

Materials and methods: A sample of 100 de-identified GoC notes was manually annotated by clinicians across four ACP categories: Patient Priorities, Code Status, Decision Maker, and Documentation. Two LLMs (Mistral 24.07 and LLaMA 3.1) were prompted to extract structured outputs without domain-specific fine-tuning. Model outputs were compared to human annotations using cosine similarity of BioBERT embeddings.

Results: Mistral 24.07 achieved high semantic similarity in Code Status (0.814), Documentation (0.781), and Patient Priorities (0.770), but lower alignment in Decision Maker (0.609).

Conclusions: LLMs can effectively extract structured ACP information, particularly in well-documented categories, suggesting potential for scalable, data-driven feedback loops that improve the provision of care. However, accuracy challenges remain, and further refinement is needed for nuanced qualitative content categories.

从电子病历的护理记录目标中总结预先护理计划信息的大型语言模型。
目标:在电子健康记录(EHR)中嵌入系统的、结构化的数据提取对于改善对护理提供的实时洞察至关重要。本研究评估了使用大型语言模型(llm)从电子病历中的非结构化护理目标(GoC)临床记录中提取结构化预先护理计划(ACP)信息的可行性。材料和方法:100份去识别的GoC笔记样本由临床医生手动注释,分为四个ACP类别:患者优先级、代码状态、决策者和文档。两个llm (Mistral 24.07和LLaMA 3.1)在没有特定领域微调的情况下被提示提取结构化输出。使用BioBERT嵌入的余弦相似度将模型输出与人类注释进行比较。结果:Mistral 24.07在代码状态(0.814)、文档(0.781)和患者优先级(0.770)方面具有较高的语义相似性,但在决策者(0.609)方面具有较低的一致性。结论:llm可以有效地提取结构化的ACP信息,特别是在记录良好的类别中,这表明可能存在可扩展的、数据驱动的反馈循环,可以改善护理的提供。然而,准确性的挑战仍然存在,并且需要对细微的定性内容类别进行进一步的细化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书