Identification and Characterization of Sepsis Phenotypes in an Indian Cohort.

IF 1.6 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-05 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ccrp/9921379
Fabia Edathadathil, Georg Gutjahr, Dipu Sathyapalan, Sanjeev Singh
{"title":"Identification and Characterization of Sepsis Phenotypes in an Indian Cohort.","authors":"Fabia Edathadathil, Georg Gutjahr, Dipu Sathyapalan, Sanjeev Singh","doi":"10.1155/ccrp/9921379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis has a heterogenous clinical presentation with distinct regional epidemiological profiles. The study aims to identify clinical phenotypes from an Indian sepsis cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cohort included all adult patients admitted through the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of sepsis following Surviving Sepsis Guidelines criteria. The unsupervised k-means clustering method was used, and the identified Indian clusters were compared using distance matching to phenotypic clusters in Seymour et al., which had previously identified four reproducible sepsis phenotypes in large Western ICU cohorts. The association of focus of infection and outcomes among the clusters were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1009 patients, four clusters were identified. Age (<i>p</i> = 0.024) and gender (<i>p</i> = 0.04) significantly differed among the clusters. The Indian clusters that exhibited close association to the alpha, beta, gamma, and delta phenotypes reported in Seymour et al. were termed i-Alpha (254, 25%), i-Beta (141, 14%), i-Gamma (389, 39%), and i-Delta (225, 22.3%) respectively. The clusters demonstrated significant variations in clinical profiles and outcomes. Septic shock and in-hospital mortality were highest among i-Alpha at 19% (48/254) and i-Beta at 34% (48/141) (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. Prevalence of pneumonia (<i>p</i> = 0.018), SSI (<i>p</i> = 0.011), and bacteremia (<i>p</i> = 0.004) significantly differed among the clusters. <i>Pseudomonas</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.008) and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.02) were also observed to be significantly different. i-Gamma was characterized by a lower mortality rate and a high prevalence of soft tissue infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding these unique phenotypes can guide personalized treatment and improve sepsis outcomes in resource-limited settings, highlighting the importance of localized research in sepsis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2026 ","pages":"9921379"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13238234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ccrp/9921379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis has a heterogenous clinical presentation with distinct regional epidemiological profiles. The study aims to identify clinical phenotypes from an Indian sepsis cohort.

Methods: The cohort included all adult patients admitted through the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of sepsis following Surviving Sepsis Guidelines criteria. The unsupervised k-means clustering method was used, and the identified Indian clusters were compared using distance matching to phenotypic clusters in Seymour et al., which had previously identified four reproducible sepsis phenotypes in large Western ICU cohorts. The association of focus of infection and outcomes among the clusters were assessed.

Results: Of the 1009 patients, four clusters were identified. Age (p = 0.024) and gender (p = 0.04) significantly differed among the clusters. The Indian clusters that exhibited close association to the alpha, beta, gamma, and delta phenotypes reported in Seymour et al. were termed i-Alpha (254, 25%), i-Beta (141, 14%), i-Gamma (389, 39%), and i-Delta (225, 22.3%) respectively. The clusters demonstrated significant variations in clinical profiles and outcomes. Septic shock and in-hospital mortality were highest among i-Alpha at 19% (48/254) and i-Beta at 34% (48/141) (p < 0.001), respectively. Prevalence of pneumonia (p = 0.018), SSI (p = 0.011), and bacteremia (p = 0.004) significantly differed among the clusters. Pseudomonas (p = 0.008) and Staphylococcus aureus (p = 0.02) were also observed to be significantly different. i-Gamma was characterized by a lower mortality rate and a high prevalence of soft tissue infections.

Conclusion: Understanding these unique phenotypes can guide personalized treatment and improve sepsis outcomes in resource-limited settings, highlighting the importance of localized research in sepsis management.

在一个印度队列中脓毒症表型的鉴定和表征。
背景:脓毒症具有不同的临床表现和不同的区域流行病学概况。该研究旨在确定印度败血症队列的临床表型。方法:该队列包括所有通过急诊科就诊的成年患者,根据生存脓毒症指南标准推定诊断为脓毒症。采用无监督k-均值聚类方法,并将鉴定出的印度聚类与Seymour等人的表型聚类进行距离匹配比较,Seymour等人之前在西方ICU大型队列中鉴定出了四种可重复的脓毒症表型。评估感染焦点与聚集性病例预后的关系。结果:在1009例患者中,鉴定出4个聚类。年龄(p = 0.024)、性别(p = 0.04)差异有统计学意义。Seymour等人报道的与α、β、gamma和delta表型密切相关的印度簇分别被称为i-Alpha(254,25%)、i-Beta(141,14%)、i-Gamma(389,39%)和i-Delta(225,22.3%)。这些群集在临床概况和结果上表现出显著的差异。感染性休克和住院死亡率在i-Alpha组最高,分别为19%(48/254)和34% (48/141)(p = 0.018), SSI组(p = 0.011)和菌血症组(p = 0.004)。假单胞菌(p = 0.008)和金黄色葡萄球菌(p = 0.02)的感染率也有显著差异。i-Gamma的特点是死亡率较低,软组织感染发生率高。结论:了解这些独特的表型可以指导在资源有限的情况下进行个性化治疗并改善脓毒症的预后,突出了本地化研究在脓毒症管理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书