Living Donor Intestinal Transplant: Indication, Techniques, Surgical Complications, and Outcomes in Recipients and Donors: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2026-05-31 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/joot/4030621
Adil Nusair, Saad Bin Yousuf, Ahmed Adham R Elsayed, Marc D Basson
{"title":"Living Donor Intestinal Transplant: Indication, Techniques, Surgical Complications, and Outcomes in Recipients and Donors: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Adil Nusair, Saad Bin Yousuf, Ahmed Adham R Elsayed, Marc D Basson","doi":"10.1155/joot/4030621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Living donor intestinal transplantation (LDITx) is an alternative option to cadaveric transplants as a last resort in treating intestinal failure. There are limited data on LDITx outcomes. This systematic review evaluates LDITx in terms of indications, contraindications, surgical complications, and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. After filtration, data were systematically extracted from all relevant observational studies, case series, and case reports. Quality assessments were performed using the CARE guideline for case reports and case series, while STROBE was used for observational studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four studies were included, comprising 11 observational studies, 9 case series, and 34 case reports. The main indications of LDITx were the availability of a compatible donor and the urgency of the recipient's clinical condition. The standard surgical technique involves segmental ileal resection and transplantation. Postoperative complications included infections, ischemic events, and vascular complications. Recipients had either manageable complications or no complications. About 21.2% of the population experienced at least one episode of rejection, with an overall mortality rate of 23%. Many cases reported successful TPN weaning and good outcomes for the recipients and donors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with chronic IF complicated by severe TPN-related morbidity or underlying pathologies causing SBS, LDITx represents an effective treatment option and an alternative to the more conventional cadaveric intestinal transplantation, bypassing problematic time sensitivity and donor availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transplantation","volume":"2026 ","pages":"4030621"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/joot/4030621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Living donor intestinal transplantation (LDITx) is an alternative option to cadaveric transplants as a last resort in treating intestinal failure. There are limited data on LDITx outcomes. This systematic review evaluates LDITx in terms of indications, contraindications, surgical complications, and patient outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. After filtration, data were systematically extracted from all relevant observational studies, case series, and case reports. Quality assessments were performed using the CARE guideline for case reports and case series, while STROBE was used for observational studies.

Results: Fifty-four studies were included, comprising 11 observational studies, 9 case series, and 34 case reports. The main indications of LDITx were the availability of a compatible donor and the urgency of the recipient's clinical condition. The standard surgical technique involves segmental ileal resection and transplantation. Postoperative complications included infections, ischemic events, and vascular complications. Recipients had either manageable complications or no complications. About 21.2% of the population experienced at least one episode of rejection, with an overall mortality rate of 23%. Many cases reported successful TPN weaning and good outcomes for the recipients and donors.

Conclusion: In patients with chronic IF complicated by severe TPN-related morbidity or underlying pathologies causing SBS, LDITx represents an effective treatment option and an alternative to the more conventional cadaveric intestinal transplantation, bypassing problematic time sensitivity and donor availability.

活体肠道移植:适应症、技术、手术并发症和受体和供体的结果:系统回顾。
背景:活体供肠移植(LDITx)是一种替代尸体移植作为治疗肠衰竭的最后手段。关于LDITx治疗结果的数据有限。本系统综述从适应症、禁忌症、手术并发症和患者预后方面评价LDITx。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、虚拟健康图书馆和Web of Science数据库进行综合检索。过滤后,系统地从所有相关观察性研究、病例系列和病例报告中提取数据。使用CARE指南对病例报告和病例系列进行质量评估,而使用STROBE进行观察性研究。结果:纳入54项研究,包括11项观察性研究、9个病例系列和34例病例报告。LDITx的主要适应症是可获得相容的供体和接受者临床状况的紧迫性。标准的手术技术包括节段性回肠切除和移植。术后并发症包括感染、缺血事件和血管并发症。接受者要么有可控的并发症,要么没有并发症。约21.2%的人至少经历过一次排斥反应,总死亡率为23%。许多病例报告TPN脱机成功,受者和供者预后良好。结论:对于慢性IF合并严重tpn相关疾病或潜在病理导致SBS的患者,LDITx是一种有效的治疗选择,可以替代更传统的尸体肠移植,绕过时间敏感性和供体可用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书