Starting Off on Solid Ground: A Learning Simulation to Scaffold the Planning Phase of the Master Adaptive Learner for EM Interns.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2026-05-21 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1002/aet2.70177
Kathryn Lorenz, April Choi, Jeremy Branzetti, Laura Hopson, Michael Gisondi, Linda Regan
{"title":"Starting Off on Solid Ground: A Learning Simulation to Scaffold the Planning Phase of the Master Adaptive Learner for EM Interns.","authors":"Kathryn Lorenz, April Choi, Jeremy Branzetti, Laura Hopson, Michael Gisondi, Linda Regan","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs must strive to teach adaptive expertise (AE) so that graduates can apply existing knowledge to innovatively address novel problems. The Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) framework describes a structured approach for the development of AE, yet its practical application in medical education, and specifically in EM training, is limited. This study aimed to explore how first-year EM residents approach identifying, prioritizing, and filling knowledge gaps during the planning phase of the MAL framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective qualitative study using a simulation-based learning exercise at two U.S. academic medical centers across two consecutive years. The simulation placed EM interns in a realistic emergency department scenario where they had to independently address knowledge gaps before engaging in guided discussions. Data were collected through surveys and focus groups, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Knowledge gaps were categorized by type (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive), and success in filling selected gaps was recorded. Intern rationales for gap prioritization and resource selection were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven EM interns participated, identifying 305 knowledge gaps, with factual gaps being most common. Participants successfully filled 90% of their top-priority knowledge gaps using resources such as UpToDate and WikEM. Rationales for gap prioritization emphasized clinical urgency (e.g., airway management) and readiness to engage in decision-making and communication. Resource selection was driven by familiarity and perceived efficiency. Interns often explored multiple resources, highlighting intellectual curiosity and desire for conceptual application of knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that EM interns possess developing skills aligned with the MAL planning phase and can effectively address knowledge gaps through structured learning simulations. Simulation-based exercises offer an impactful method for contextualizing medical education theory and preparing residents for future clinical challenges. These findings support the integration of MAL principles into early residency curricula to promote adaptive expertise development.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"10 3","pages":"e70177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency medicine (EM) residency programs must strive to teach adaptive expertise (AE) so that graduates can apply existing knowledge to innovatively address novel problems. The Master Adaptive Learner (MAL) framework describes a structured approach for the development of AE, yet its practical application in medical education, and specifically in EM training, is limited. This study aimed to explore how first-year EM residents approach identifying, prioritizing, and filling knowledge gaps during the planning phase of the MAL framework.

Methods: We conducted a prospective qualitative study using a simulation-based learning exercise at two U.S. academic medical centers across two consecutive years. The simulation placed EM interns in a realistic emergency department scenario where they had to independently address knowledge gaps before engaging in guided discussions. Data were collected through surveys and focus groups, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Knowledge gaps were categorized by type (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive), and success in filling selected gaps was recorded. Intern rationales for gap prioritization and resource selection were examined.

Results: Fifty-seven EM interns participated, identifying 305 knowledge gaps, with factual gaps being most common. Participants successfully filled 90% of their top-priority knowledge gaps using resources such as UpToDate and WikEM. Rationales for gap prioritization emphasized clinical urgency (e.g., airway management) and readiness to engage in decision-making and communication. Resource selection was driven by familiarity and perceived efficiency. Interns often explored multiple resources, highlighting intellectual curiosity and desire for conceptual application of knowledge.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that EM interns possess developing skills aligned with the MAL planning phase and can effectively address knowledge gaps through structured learning simulations. Simulation-based exercises offer an impactful method for contextualizing medical education theory and preparing residents for future clinical challenges. These findings support the integration of MAL principles into early residency curricula to promote adaptive expertise development.

从坚实的基础开始:一个学习模拟来支撑EM实习生的主适应学习者的规划阶段。
背景:急诊医学(EM)住院医师项目必须努力教授适应性专业知识(AE),以便毕业生能够应用现有知识创新地解决新问题。Master Adaptive Learner (MAL)框架描述了AE发展的结构化方法,但其在医学教育,特别是EM培训中的实际应用是有限的。本研究旨在探讨第一年新兴市场住院医师如何在MAL框架的规划阶段识别、优先排序和填补知识空白。方法:我们在两个美国学术医学中心连续两年进行了一项前瞻性定性研究,使用基于模拟的学习练习。模拟将急诊实习生置于一个现实的急诊科场景中,他们必须在参与指导讨论之前独立解决知识差距。通过调查和焦点小组收集数据,进行转录并进行主题分析。知识缺口按类型(事实、概念、程序、元认知)分类,并记录成功填补所选空白的情况。对差距优先排序和资源选择的实习理由进行了审查。结果:57名新兴市场实习生参与了调查,发现了305项知识差距,其中以事实差距最为常见。参与者使用UpToDate和WikEM等资源,成功填补了90%的最重要的知识空白。差距优先排序的理由强调临床紧迫性(例如,气道管理)和参与决策和沟通的准备。资源选择受熟悉度和感知效率驱动。实习生经常探索多种资源,突出求知欲和对知识概念应用的渴望。结论:本研究表明,EM实习生拥有与MAL计划阶段相一致的发展技能,并且可以通过结构化的学习模拟有效地解决知识差距。以模拟为基础的练习提供了一种有效的方法,可以将医学教育理论背景化,并为住院医生应对未来的临床挑战做好准备。这些发现支持将MAL原则整合到早期住院医师课程中,以促进适应性专业知识的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书