CBME As a Philosophy of Training: Balancing Fidelity and Flexibility in Emergency Medicine.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2026-05-27 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1002/aet2.70196
Benjamin Kinnear, Sally A Santen, Tiffany Murano, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Martin Pusic
{"title":"CBME As a Philosophy of Training: Balancing Fidelity and Flexibility in Emergency Medicine.","authors":"Benjamin Kinnear, Sally A Santen, Tiffany Murano, Holly Caretta-Weyer, Martin Pusic","doi":"10.1002/aet2.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2025 SAEM Consensus Conference: \"Competency-Based Training and Certification: The Future of Emergency Medicine Education\" provided the opportunity to further the development of competency-based medical education (CBME) in Emergency Medicine. This perspective argues that CBME is a flexible philosophy of training rather than a fixed checklist or recipe, and as such can and should manifest variably across contexts and specialties. The authors reason that by viewing CBME as a philosophy, multiple beneficial corollaries follow: (1) CBME training will demand a balance of fidelity of philosophical implementation with necessary context-specific flexibility. (2) Philosophies are dynamic, and as such CBME has already evolved over time and will continue to do so. (3) Medical education has agency to direct such evolution and to choose different philosophies of training if CBME is not delivering what it purports to do. Emergency Medicine is encouraged to approach their work through the philosophy of CBME by embracing CBME principles with training and reframing assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"10 3","pages":"e70196"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13239202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2025 SAEM Consensus Conference: "Competency-Based Training and Certification: The Future of Emergency Medicine Education" provided the opportunity to further the development of competency-based medical education (CBME) in Emergency Medicine. This perspective argues that CBME is a flexible philosophy of training rather than a fixed checklist or recipe, and as such can and should manifest variably across contexts and specialties. The authors reason that by viewing CBME as a philosophy, multiple beneficial corollaries follow: (1) CBME training will demand a balance of fidelity of philosophical implementation with necessary context-specific flexibility. (2) Philosophies are dynamic, and as such CBME has already evolved over time and will continue to do so. (3) Medical education has agency to direct such evolution and to choose different philosophies of training if CBME is not delivering what it purports to do. Emergency Medicine is encouraged to approach their work through the philosophy of CBME by embracing CBME principles with training and reframing assessment.

CBME作为一种培训哲学:在急诊医学中平衡忠实度和灵活性。
2025年SAEM共识会议:“以能力为基础的培训和认证:急诊医学教育的未来”提供了进一步发展急诊医学能力为基础的医学教育(CBME)的机会。这种观点认为CBME是一种灵活的培训哲学,而不是固定的清单或配方,因此可以而且应该在不同的环境和专业中表现出不同的特征。作者认为,通过将CBME视为一种哲学,可以得出多种有益的推论:(1)CBME培训将需要在哲学实施的保真度与必要的上下文特定灵活性之间取得平衡。(2)哲学是动态的,因此CBME已经随着时间的推移而演变,并将继续这样做。(3)医学教育具有指导这种演变和选择不同的培训哲学的代理,如果CBME没有提供它所要做的。鼓励急诊医学通过CBME的哲学,通过培训和重新构建评估来接受CBME原则,从而接近他们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书