Metabolomics and ultra-processed foods intake: A scoping review protocol.

IF 2.9 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2026-05-25 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2026.103974
Talita do Nascimento Peixoto, Anna Luisa Moura Alencar Rocha, Lucia Fátima Campos Pedrosa
{"title":"Metabolomics and ultra-processed foods intake: A scoping review protocol.","authors":"Talita do Nascimento Peixoto, Anna Luisa Moura Alencar Rocha, Lucia Fátima Campos Pedrosa","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2026.103974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The association between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and adverse health outcomes remains unclear regarding its mechanistic explanation. In this context, metabolomics emerges as a promising approach for identifying biomarkers and understanding the metabolic effects of these foods on the body. However, the evidence linking metabolomic profiles to UPFs consumption remains limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aims to map and synthesize the available scientific evidence on the use of metabolomics in the study of UPFs consumption, characterize the study designs and methodological approaches employed, and identify knowledge gaps. The review will be conducted according to the JBI methodology and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Searches will be performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and synthesized narratively. This review is expected to provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence, highlight methodological heterogeneity, and identify gaps that may guide future research. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF).</p>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"16 ","pages":"103974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13235362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2026.103974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The association between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and adverse health outcomes remains unclear regarding its mechanistic explanation. In this context, metabolomics emerges as a promising approach for identifying biomarkers and understanding the metabolic effects of these foods on the body. However, the evidence linking metabolomic profiles to UPFs consumption remains limited and heterogeneous. This scoping review aims to map and synthesize the available scientific evidence on the use of metabolomics in the study of UPFs consumption, characterize the study designs and methodological approaches employed, and identify knowledge gaps. The review will be conducted according to the JBI methodology and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Searches will be performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for inclusion. Data will be extracted using a standardized form and synthesized narratively. This review is expected to provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence, highlight methodological heterogeneity, and identify gaps that may guide future research. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF).

代谢组学和超加工食品摄入:一项范围审查方案。
超加工食品(upf)消费与不良健康结果之间的关联,其机制解释尚不清楚。在这种背景下,代谢组学成为一种很有前途的方法,用于识别生物标志物和了解这些食物对人体的代谢影响。然而,将代谢组学特征与UPFs消耗联系起来的证据仍然有限且不一致。本综述的目的是绘制和综合有关代谢组学在upf消费研究中使用的现有科学证据,描述所采用的研究设计和方法方法,并确定知识差距。审查将根据JBI方法进行,并根据PRISMA-ScR检查表进行报告。检索将在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS和Web of Science数据库中进行。两名审稿人将独立筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。数据将以标准化的形式提取,并以叙述的方式合成。本综述旨在对现有证据提供一个全面的概述,强调方法的异质性,并找出可能指导未来研究的差距。该协议已在开放科学框架(OSF)中注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书