Luigi Francesco Iannone, Marina Romozzi, Luca Pani, Fabio Tascedda
{"title":"Darigabat and subtype-selective GABA-A modulation: pharmacology, clinical development, and translational challenges.","authors":"Luigi Francesco Iannone, Marina Romozzi, Luca Pani, Fabio Tascedda","doi":"10.1080/13543784.2026.2687030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Darigabat is a selective γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA-A) receptor positive allosteric modulator targeting α2, α3, and α5 subunits, developed to preserve anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects while reducing α1-mediated sedation and cognitive adverse events. Subtype-selective modulation represents a strategy to improve the safety of GABAergic therapies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 2025 identified 20 preclinical and clinical studies. Darigabat demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, high brain penetration, and overall acceptable tolerability, with dose-dependent central nervous system adverse effects at higher exposures. Preclinical models showed anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity. However, clinical trials reported heterogeneous and inconsistent efficacy across indications.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Darigabat supports the feasibility of subtype-selective GABA-A modulation. Early-phase studies in healthy volunteers suggested improved acute tolerability compared with nonselective benzodiazepines. In contrast, repeated-dose studies in patients revealed dose-dependent central nervous system adverse effects, including somnolence, psychomotor slowing, and cognitive impairment, indicating that α1-sparing reduces but does not eliminate these effects. Current evidence does not support a clear therapeutic role in chronic central nervous system disorders. Future research should focus on exposure-response relationships, identification of responsive subgroups, and biomarker integration. The ability to retain efficacy with improved safety remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12313,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","volume":" ","pages":"449-462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on investigational drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13543784.2026.2687030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Darigabat is a selective γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA-A) receptor positive allosteric modulator targeting α2, α3, and α5 subunits, developed to preserve anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects while reducing α1-mediated sedation and cognitive adverse events. Subtype-selective modulation represents a strategy to improve the safety of GABAergic therapies.
Areas covered: A literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 2025 identified 20 preclinical and clinical studies. Darigabat demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, high brain penetration, and overall acceptable tolerability, with dose-dependent central nervous system adverse effects at higher exposures. Preclinical models showed anticonvulsant and anxiolytic activity. However, clinical trials reported heterogeneous and inconsistent efficacy across indications.
Expert opinion: Darigabat supports the feasibility of subtype-selective GABA-A modulation. Early-phase studies in healthy volunteers suggested improved acute tolerability compared with nonselective benzodiazepines. In contrast, repeated-dose studies in patients revealed dose-dependent central nervous system adverse effects, including somnolence, psychomotor slowing, and cognitive impairment, indicating that α1-sparing reduces but does not eliminate these effects. Current evidence does not support a clear therapeutic role in chronic central nervous system disorders. Future research should focus on exposure-response relationships, identification of responsive subgroups, and biomarker integration. The ability to retain efficacy with improved safety remains uncertain.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs (ISSN 1354-3784 [print], 1744-7658 [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on drugs in preclinical and early stage clinical development, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
The Editors welcome:
Reviews covering preclinical through to Phase II data on drugs or drug classes for specific indications, and their potential impact on future treatment strategies
Drug Evaluations reviewing the clinical and pharmacological data on a particular drug
Original Research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on agents that are in Phase I and II clinical trials
The audience consists of scientists, managers and decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry, and others closely involved in R&D.