Plasma p-tau as a biomarker for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Linsong Chai, Ying Zhan, Yunshi Huang, Meifang Tian, Guangning Zhao, Jinglei Ni, Xiao Xiong, Jia Huang, Bingbing Lin
{"title":"Plasma p-tau as a biomarker for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Linsong Chai, Ying Zhan, Yunshi Huang, Meifang Tian, Guangning Zhao, Jinglei Ni, Xiao Xiong, Jia Huang, Bingbing Lin","doi":"10.1186/s13195-026-02104-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the clinical implementation of amyloid-targeting therapies, accurately differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative dementias is imperative. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized data on the diagnostic performance of three plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) isoforms identified through a comprehensive literature search, namely p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched major databases up to November 30, 2025, for studies comparing blood p-tau levels in AD versus biologically confirmed non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Data were synthesized using bivariate random-effects models to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies comprising 6,138 participants were included. Blood p-tau biomarkers demonstrated robust overall accuracy (AUC 0.90) and a high positive likelihood ratio (PLR 3.77). Comparison of isoforms revealed that plasma p-tau217 exhibited superior performance (AUC 0.95; Sensitivity 0.93) with a remarkable DOR of 57.98, which was nearly six-fold higher than that of p-tau231 (DOR 9.83). Subgroup analyses showed exceptional specificity for differentiating AD from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (0.91) and vascular dementia (0.83), but discriminative ability against dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was significantly lower (Specificity 0.69; DOR 7.54). Furthermore, plasma-based assays (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96) significantly outperformed serum-based methods (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78), as evidenced by non-overlapping confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Plasma p-tau217 is the superior biomarker for the differential diagnosis of AD, particularly for ruling out FTD, though distinguishing AD from DLB remains challenging due to mixed pathology. The distinct superiority of plasma over serum supports the exclusive use of plasma-based protocols for clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13463404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02104-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the clinical implementation of amyloid-targeting therapies, accurately differentiating Alzheimer's disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative dementias is imperative. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized data on the diagnostic performance of three plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau) isoforms identified through a comprehensive literature search, namely p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231.

Methods: We searched major databases up to November 30, 2025, for studies comparing blood p-tau levels in AD versus biologically confirmed non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Data were synthesized using bivariate random-effects models to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).

Results: Thirty-three studies comprising 6,138 participants were included. Blood p-tau biomarkers demonstrated robust overall accuracy (AUC 0.90) and a high positive likelihood ratio (PLR 3.77). Comparison of isoforms revealed that plasma p-tau217 exhibited superior performance (AUC 0.95; Sensitivity 0.93) with a remarkable DOR of 57.98, which was nearly six-fold higher than that of p-tau231 (DOR 9.83). Subgroup analyses showed exceptional specificity for differentiating AD from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (0.91) and vascular dementia (0.83), but discriminative ability against dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) was significantly lower (Specificity 0.69; DOR 7.54). Furthermore, plasma-based assays (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96) significantly outperformed serum-based methods (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78), as evidenced by non-overlapping confidence intervals.

Conclusions: Plasma p-tau217 is the superior biomarker for the differential diagnosis of AD, particularly for ruling out FTD, though distinguishing AD from DLB remains challenging due to mixed pathology. The distinct superiority of plasma over serum supports the exclusive use of plasma-based protocols for clinical implementation.

血浆p-tau作为阿尔茨海默病鉴别诊断的生物标志物:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:随着淀粉样蛋白靶向治疗的临床实施,准确区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)与其他神经退行性痴呆是势在必行的。本系统综述和荟萃分析综合了通过全面文献检索鉴定出的三种血浆磷酸化tau (p-tau)亚型的诊断性能数据,即p-tau181、p-tau217和p-tau231。方法:我们检索了截至2025年11月30日的主要数据库,以比较阿尔茨海默病与生物学证实的非阿尔茨海默病神经退行性疾病的血液p-tau水平。采用双变量随机效应模型综合数据,计算合并敏感性、特异性、曲线下面积(AUC)和诊断优势比(DOR)。结果:纳入33项研究,6138名受试者。血液p-tau生物标志物显示出强大的总体准确性(AUC 0.90)和高阳性似然比(PLR 3.77)。血浆p-tau217表现出较好的检测效果(AUC为0.95,灵敏度为0.93),DOR为57.98,比p-tau231 (DOR为9.83)高出近6倍。亚组分析显示,区分AD与行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)(0.91)和血管性痴呆(0.83)的特异性异常,但区分路易体痴呆(DLB)的能力明显较低(特异性0.69;DOR 7.54)。此外,无重叠置信区间证明,基于血浆的检测(AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96)显著优于基于血清的检测(AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.78)。结论:血浆p-tau217是AD鉴别诊断的优越生物标志物,特别是在排除FTD方面,尽管由于混合病理,区分AD和DLB仍然具有挑战性。血浆相对于血清的明显优势支持了血浆为基础的方案在临床实施中的独家使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书