LEO-based interpolation methods comparison for regional augmented PPP

IF 2.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Jing Fang, Rui Tu, Runzhi Zhang, Fang Cheng, Xiaochun Lu
{"title":"LEO-based interpolation methods comparison for regional augmented PPP","authors":"Jing Fang,&nbsp;Rui Tu,&nbsp;Runzhi Zhang,&nbsp;Fang Cheng,&nbsp;Xiaochun Lu","doi":"10.1007/s40328-026-00495-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In this study, a low-Earth orbit (LEO) constellation of 160 LEO satellites was simulated, and simulated LEO observations from American regional stations were used to investigate regional augmented precise point positioning (PPP). For reference networks with scales of 75 km and 165 km, the low-order surface model (LSM), the distance-based linear interpolation method (DIM), and the modified linear combination model (MLCM) were respectively used to interpolate atmospheric delays. For both scales of the reference networks, the root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the inter-satellite single-difference (SD) ionospheric slant delay residuals and the tropospheric zenith wet delays (ZWDs) residuals interpolated by the three methods were respectively less than 2.00 cm and 0.25 cm, and the accuracy of the atmospheric delays interpolated by the three methods was comparable. Within the 75‑km and 165‑km reference networks, using the interpolated atmospheric delays to constrain undifferenced and uncombined (UDUC) PPP improved the positioning performance of both the float and fixed solutions, and also augmented the ambiguity resolution (AR) performance of the fixed solutions. The enhancement effects of the three methods were comparable, and the enhancement effect decreased slightly as the scale of the reference network increased. Among the three methods, LSM performed slightly better than DIM and MLCM in the up direction, since the LSM used in this study is an interpolation model that accounts for the elevation factor.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":"61 2","pages":"287 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-026-00495-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a low-Earth orbit (LEO) constellation of 160 LEO satellites was simulated, and simulated LEO observations from American regional stations were used to investigate regional augmented precise point positioning (PPP). For reference networks with scales of 75 km and 165 km, the low-order surface model (LSM), the distance-based linear interpolation method (DIM), and the modified linear combination model (MLCM) were respectively used to interpolate atmospheric delays. For both scales of the reference networks, the root mean square errors (RMSEs) of the inter-satellite single-difference (SD) ionospheric slant delay residuals and the tropospheric zenith wet delays (ZWDs) residuals interpolated by the three methods were respectively less than 2.00 cm and 0.25 cm, and the accuracy of the atmospheric delays interpolated by the three methods was comparable. Within the 75‑km and 165‑km reference networks, using the interpolated atmospheric delays to constrain undifferenced and uncombined (UDUC) PPP improved the positioning performance of both the float and fixed solutions, and also augmented the ambiguity resolution (AR) performance of the fixed solutions. The enhancement effects of the three methods were comparable, and the enhancement effect decreased slightly as the scale of the reference network increased. Among the three methods, LSM performed slightly better than DIM and MLCM in the up direction, since the LSM used in this study is an interpolation model that accounts for the elevation factor.

Abstract Image

基于leo的区域增强型PPP插值方法比较
本研究模拟了一个由160颗LEO卫星组成的低地球轨道(LEO)星座,并利用美国区域站的模拟LEO观测数据对区域增强精确点定位(PPP)进行了研究。对于75 km和165 km的参考网络,分别采用低阶地面模型(LSM)、基于距离的线性插值方法(DIM)和改进的线性组合模型(MLCM)对大气延迟进行插值。在两种参考网络尺度下,三种方法插值的卫星间电离层单差(SD)延迟残差和对流层天顶湿延迟(ZWDs)残差均方根误差(rmse)分别小于2.00 cm和0.25 cm,三种方法插值的大气延迟精度相当。在75 km和165 km参考网络中,使用插值的大气延迟来约束undifferential and uncombined (UDUC) PPP,提高了浮动和固定解决方案的定位性能,也增强了固定解决方案的模糊分辨率(AR)性能。三种方法的增强效果具有可比性,且随着参考网络规模的增大,增强效果略有下降。在三种方法中,LSM在向上方向上的表现略好于DIM和MLCM,因为本研究中使用的LSM是一个考虑高程因子的插值模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书