Joseph Omeiza Alao, Momohjimoh Abdulsalami, Kazah A. Kogi
{"title":"Machine learning-augmented climate models for predicting groundwater stress zones in Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Joseph Omeiza Alao, Momohjimoh Abdulsalami, Kazah A. Kogi","doi":"10.1007/s40328-026-00497-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Groundwater supplies more than 70% of water demand in SSA regions, but is increasingly under threat from climate change and population growth. Conventional groundwater models are data-intensive and not appropriate for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) contexts. This systematic review assesses Machine Learning-Augmented Groundwater Models (ML-AGMs) such as Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM algorithms to predict groundwater stress zones with minimal data inputs and satellite-based climate data. Several peer-reviewed articles (2015–2025) were analyzed to assess the efficacy, applicability, and scalability to SSA regions. Findings reveal that ML-AGMs provided excellent prediction potential (RMSE error range: 0.356–0.372 m; R-squared: 0.503–0.679) with minimal data inputs. This represents an important innovation where data-scarce groundwater modeling is possible and dynamic. Google Earth Engine and QGIS enhance spatiotemporal analysis and improve communication with stakeholders. However, this review also highlights limitations of ML-AGM concerning data quality, applicability issues, and ethical considerations. Further research recommendations include hybridized models and inclusion of socioeconomic factors. ML-AGM and applications provide scalable and enhanced Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 implementation. However, issues and limitations persist with aquifer diversity and the equitable application of groundwater stress assessments.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":"61 2","pages":"177 - 197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-026-00497-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Groundwater supplies more than 70% of water demand in SSA regions, but is increasingly under threat from climate change and population growth. Conventional groundwater models are data-intensive and not appropriate for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) contexts. This systematic review assesses Machine Learning-Augmented Groundwater Models (ML-AGMs) such as Random Forest, XGBoost, and LSTM algorithms to predict groundwater stress zones with minimal data inputs and satellite-based climate data. Several peer-reviewed articles (2015–2025) were analyzed to assess the efficacy, applicability, and scalability to SSA regions. Findings reveal that ML-AGMs provided excellent prediction potential (RMSE error range: 0.356–0.372 m; R-squared: 0.503–0.679) with minimal data inputs. This represents an important innovation where data-scarce groundwater modeling is possible and dynamic. Google Earth Engine and QGIS enhance spatiotemporal analysis and improve communication with stakeholders. However, this review also highlights limitations of ML-AGM concerning data quality, applicability issues, and ethical considerations. Further research recommendations include hybridized models and inclusion of socioeconomic factors. ML-AGM and applications provide scalable and enhanced Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6 implementation. However, issues and limitations persist with aquifer diversity and the equitable application of groundwater stress assessments.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.