Comparative overall survival in T4N0 and T2-3N1 non-metastatic colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Annals of Saudi medicine Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-05 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2026.169
Fırat Akagunduz, Ali Kaan Güren, Erkam Kocaaslan, Burak Paçacı, Mustafa Alperen Tunç, Ahmet Demirel, Yesim Ağyol, Pınar Erel, Abdussamet Çelebi, Selver Işik, Ezgi Coban, Murat Sarı, Ibrahim Vedat Bayoğlu, Osman Köstek, Nazım Can Demircan
{"title":"Comparative overall survival in T4N0 and T2-3N1 non-metastatic colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Fırat Akagunduz, Ali Kaan Güren, Erkam Kocaaslan, Burak Paçacı, Mustafa Alperen Tunç, Ahmet Demirel, Yesim Ağyol, Pınar Erel, Abdussamet Çelebi, Selver Işik, Ezgi Coban, Murat Sarı, Ibrahim Vedat Bayoğlu, Osman Köstek, Nazım Can Demircan","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2026.169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic significance of pathological T stage relative to nodal involvement in colon cancer remains controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with T4N0 disease may experience outcomes comparable to or worse than those with node-positive disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare long-term oncologic outcomes between patients with non-metastatic T4N0 colon cancer and those with T2-3N1 disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Single-center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent surgery between 1999 and 2020. Patients were categorized into T4N0 and T2-3N1 groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>A total of 273 patients were included, of whom 78 (28.6%) were staged as T4N0 and 195 (71.4%) as T2-3N1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 72 months, patients with T4N0 disease showed significantly worse OS than those with T2-3N1 disease (HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.06-2.75; <i>P</i>=.02). Five-year OS rates were 66.6% and 79.8% in the T4N0 and T2-3N1 groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, pathological T4N0 stage (HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.93; <i>P</i>=.03), age ≥65 years, vascular invasion, and omission of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy independently predicted poorer OS. Stage T4N0 was also associated with higher locoregional and distant recurrence rates, with increased peritoneal involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-metastatic T4N0 colon cancer is associated with less favorable long-term survival and higher recurrence rates compared with T2-3N1 disease, supporting its classification as a biologically aggressive subgroup that may benefit from treatment strategies similar to selected stage III colon cancers.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The retrospective, single-center design may introduce selection bias, and limited molecular data precluded detailed sub-group analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":93875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi medicine","volume":"46 3","pages":"169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2026.169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognostic significance of pathological T stage relative to nodal involvement in colon cancer remains controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with T4N0 disease may experience outcomes comparable to or worse than those with node-positive disease.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare long-term oncologic outcomes between patients with non-metastatic T4N0 colon cancer and those with T2-3N1 disease.

Design: Retrospective.

Settings: Single-center.

Patients and methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with histologically confirmed, non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent surgery between 1999 and 2020. Patients were categorized into T4N0 and T2-3N1 groups.

Main outcome measures: Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.

Sample size: A total of 273 patients were included, of whom 78 (28.6%) were staged as T4N0 and 195 (71.4%) as T2-3N1.

Results: After a median follow-up of 72 months, patients with T4N0 disease showed significantly worse OS than those with T2-3N1 disease (HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.06-2.75; P=.02). Five-year OS rates were 66.6% and 79.8% in the T4N0 and T2-3N1 groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, pathological T4N0 stage (HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.93; P=.03), age ≥65 years, vascular invasion, and omission of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy independently predicted poorer OS. Stage T4N0 was also associated with higher locoregional and distant recurrence rates, with increased peritoneal involvement.

Conclusions: Non-metastatic T4N0 colon cancer is associated with less favorable long-term survival and higher recurrence rates compared with T2-3N1 disease, supporting its classification as a biologically aggressive subgroup that may benefit from treatment strategies similar to selected stage III colon cancers.

Limitations: The retrospective, single-center design may introduce selection bias, and limited molecular data precluded detailed sub-group analyses.

T4N0和T2-3N1非转移性结肠癌的比较总生存率:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:病理T分期与结肠癌淋巴结累及的预后意义仍有争议。新出现的证据表明,T4N0疾病患者的预后可能与淋巴结阳性疾病患者相当或更差。目的:本研究旨在比较非转移性T4N0结肠癌患者和T2-3N1疾病患者的长期肿瘤预后。设计:回顾性。设置:单中心。患者和方法:回顾性分析1999年至2020年间组织学证实的非转移性结肠腺癌患者的治疗目的手术。患者分为T4N0组和T2-3N1组。主要结局指标:使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS),并与log-rank检验进行比较。使用单因素和多因素Cox比例风险模型评估预后因素。样本量:共纳入273例患者,其中78例(28.6%)分期为T4N0, 195例(71.4%)分期为T2-3N1。结果:中位随访72个月后,T4N0疾病患者的OS明显差于T2-3N1疾病患者(HR=1.72, 95% CI 1.06-2.75; P= 0.02)。T4N0组和T2-3N1组5年生存率分别为66.6%和79.8%。在多因素分析中,病理性T4N0分期(HR=1.74, 95% CI 1.03-2.93; P= 0.03)、年龄≥65岁、血管侵犯和遗漏奥沙利铂辅助化疗独立预测较差的OS。T4N0期也与较高的局部和远处复发率相关,并伴有腹膜受累增加。结论:与T2-3N1疾病相比,非转移性T4N0结肠癌的长期生存率较低,复发率较高,支持其作为生物侵袭性亚组的分类,可能受益于类似于选择的III期结肠癌的治疗策略。局限性:回顾性、单中心设计可能会引入选择偏倚,并且有限的分子数据妨碍了详细的亚组分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书