Lixin Hu , Yawen Tan , Zhengge Jin , Wenxin Ge , Liqing Yao , Wanxin Wu , Jiaqi Chen , Xiuzhi Yang , Zhuowen Wu , Sichun Lin , Yinhuan Guo , Qiqi Lai , Jingyang Fang , Yajun Chen
{"title":"Green space and child development: Exposure-specific associations with neurobehavioral profiles identified through latent profile and network analysis","authors":"Lixin Hu , Yawen Tan , Zhengge Jin , Wenxin Ge , Liqing Yao , Wanxin Wu , Jiaqi Chen , Xiuzhi Yang , Zhuowen Wu , Sichun Lin , Yinhuan Guo , Qiqi Lai , Jingyang Fang , Yajun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing evidence has documented associations between green space and children's mental health and cognition, prior studies have typically examined isolated outcomes using remote-sensing metrics, overlooking integrated neurobehavioral profiles and the role of self-reported experiences. We addressed this gap by examining associations between multidimensional green space and integrated neurobehavioral profiles among 5344 children in southern China. Children's executive function and emotional-behavioral problems were assessed using parent-reported Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), respectively. Objective greenspace was assessed via satellite-based indices (the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), and enhanced vegetation index (EVI)) and street view-based green view index (GVI). Self-reported green space experience and engagement encompassed accessibility, window views, indoor plants, usage patterns, and perceived quality. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) integrated BRIEF and SDQ dimensions to identify distinct neurobehavioral profiles. Associations with multidimensional green space metrics were examined using linear modeling, and network analysis was applied to pinpoint core nodes. LPA identified four distinct neurobehavioral profiles, ranging from “Well-Adapted” (Profile 1) with minimal difficulties to “Pervasive Difficulties” (Profile 4) characterized by the most severe problems. Relative to Profile 1, satellite-based indices were associated only with Profile 4, while GVI was associated with both Profile 3 (Hyperactive-Cognitive Dysregulation) and Profile 4. In contrast, self-reported experience and engagement showed broader associations. Furthermore, network analysis identified emotional symptoms as a core node. These findings indicate that associations between green space and children's neurobehavioral development are profile-specific, with emotional symptoms potentially representing a key factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 103081"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494426001829","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing evidence has documented associations between green space and children's mental health and cognition, prior studies have typically examined isolated outcomes using remote-sensing metrics, overlooking integrated neurobehavioral profiles and the role of self-reported experiences. We addressed this gap by examining associations between multidimensional green space and integrated neurobehavioral profiles among 5344 children in southern China. Children's executive function and emotional-behavioral problems were assessed using parent-reported Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), respectively. Objective greenspace was assessed via satellite-based indices (the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI), and enhanced vegetation index (EVI)) and street view-based green view index (GVI). Self-reported green space experience and engagement encompassed accessibility, window views, indoor plants, usage patterns, and perceived quality. Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) integrated BRIEF and SDQ dimensions to identify distinct neurobehavioral profiles. Associations with multidimensional green space metrics were examined using linear modeling, and network analysis was applied to pinpoint core nodes. LPA identified four distinct neurobehavioral profiles, ranging from “Well-Adapted” (Profile 1) with minimal difficulties to “Pervasive Difficulties” (Profile 4) characterized by the most severe problems. Relative to Profile 1, satellite-based indices were associated only with Profile 4, while GVI was associated with both Profile 3 (Hyperactive-Cognitive Dysregulation) and Profile 4. In contrast, self-reported experience and engagement showed broader associations. Furthermore, network analysis identified emotional symptoms as a core node. These findings indicate that associations between green space and children's neurobehavioral development are profile-specific, with emotional symptoms potentially representing a key factor.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space