Prioritizing multi-stakeholder solutions for autonomous delivery robot implementation in urban last-mile logistics: An integrated socio-technical systems and institutional theory framework

Q1 Engineering
Transportation Engineering Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.treng.2026.100446
Detcharat Sumrit, Supapit Apiwatvaravong
{"title":"Prioritizing multi-stakeholder solutions for autonomous delivery robot implementation in urban last-mile logistics: An integrated socio-technical systems and institutional theory framework","authors":"Detcharat Sumrit,&nbsp;Supapit Apiwatvaravong","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2026.100446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) are widely promoted as a solution to improve efficiency in urban last-mile logistics, yet their large-scale adoption remains limited. This is mainly due to social, regulatory, and infrastructure-related challenges rather than technological constraints. This study develops a structured decision-making framework to analyze ADR implementation barriers and to identify effective multi-stakeholder solutions while accounting for uncertainty and interdependencies in expert judgments. The results show that ADR barriers are highly interconnected. Institutional arrangements and infrastructure conditions act as underlying drivers that influence many other challenges, whereas public acceptance, cybersecurity concerns, and human–robot interaction issues largely emerge as outcomes of weak governance and limited system readiness. Safety compliance and risk liability are identified as the most influential barriers, followed by cybersecurity vulnerabilities and cultural or behavioral constraints. These findings indicate that progress in ADR adoption depends more on clear responsibilities, trust, and social readiness than on further technological development alone. The solution analysis shows that governance- and infrastructure-oriented actions are more effective than isolated technical measures. Ethical guidelines, clear legal frameworks, and stronger industry collaboration are identified as the most effective strategies, highlighting the need for coordinated action among regulators, technology developers, and logistics service providers. Theoretically, the study reinforces the view that ADRs should be understood as part of a broader urban system rather than as standalone technologies. Practically, the findings provide clear guidance for stakeholders seeking to enable responsible and scalable ADR deployment in urban last-mile logistics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X26000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous delivery robots (ADRs) are widely promoted as a solution to improve efficiency in urban last-mile logistics, yet their large-scale adoption remains limited. This is mainly due to social, regulatory, and infrastructure-related challenges rather than technological constraints. This study develops a structured decision-making framework to analyze ADR implementation barriers and to identify effective multi-stakeholder solutions while accounting for uncertainty and interdependencies in expert judgments. The results show that ADR barriers are highly interconnected. Institutional arrangements and infrastructure conditions act as underlying drivers that influence many other challenges, whereas public acceptance, cybersecurity concerns, and human–robot interaction issues largely emerge as outcomes of weak governance and limited system readiness. Safety compliance and risk liability are identified as the most influential barriers, followed by cybersecurity vulnerabilities and cultural or behavioral constraints. These findings indicate that progress in ADR adoption depends more on clear responsibilities, trust, and social readiness than on further technological development alone. The solution analysis shows that governance- and infrastructure-oriented actions are more effective than isolated technical measures. Ethical guidelines, clear legal frameworks, and stronger industry collaboration are identified as the most effective strategies, highlighting the need for coordinated action among regulators, technology developers, and logistics service providers. Theoretically, the study reinforces the view that ADRs should be understood as part of a broader urban system rather than as standalone technologies. Practically, the findings provide clear guidance for stakeholders seeking to enable responsible and scalable ADR deployment in urban last-mile logistics.
城市最后一英里物流中自主配送机器人实施的优先多利益相关者解决方案:综合社会技术系统和制度理论框架
自主配送机器人(adr)作为提高城市最后一英里物流效率的解决方案被广泛推广,但它们的大规模采用仍然有限。这主要是由于社会、监管和基础设施相关的挑战,而不是技术限制。本研究开发了一个结构化的决策框架,以分析ADR实施的障碍,并确定有效的多利益相关者解决方案,同时考虑专家判断中的不确定性和相互依赖性。结果表明,ADR障碍是高度相互关联的。制度安排和基础设施条件是影响许多其他挑战的潜在驱动因素,而公众接受度、网络安全问题和人机交互问题主要是治理薄弱和系统准备不足的结果。安全合规和风险责任被认为是最具影响力的障碍,其次是网络安全漏洞和文化或行为限制。这些发现表明,ADR采用的进展更多地取决于明确的责任、信任和社会准备程度,而不仅仅是进一步的技术发展。解决方案分析表明,面向治理和基础设施的行动比孤立的技术措施更有效。道德准则、明确的法律框架和更强有力的行业合作被认为是最有效的策略,强调了监管机构、技术开发商和物流服务提供商之间协调行动的必要性。从理论上讲,这项研究强化了这样一种观点,即adr应该被理解为更广泛的城市系统的一部分,而不是作为独立的技术。实际上,研究结果为寻求在城市最后一英里物流中实现负责任和可扩展的ADR部署的利益相关者提供了明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书