Spatial proximity and accessibility patterns of X-minute cities

IF 6.5 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Journal of Urban Mobility Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.urbmob.2026.100239
Umut Türk , John Östh , Karima Kourtit , Peter Nijkamp
{"title":"Spatial proximity and accessibility patterns of X-minute cities","authors":"Umut Türk ,&nbsp;John Östh ,&nbsp;Karima Kourtit ,&nbsp;Peter Nijkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2026.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The 15-minute city concept has gained prominence in urban planning as a framework linking proximity, mobility, and quality of life at the intra-urban scale. An open question is whether this concept remains meaningful when applied to spatially connected urban regions or national urban systems. To address this issue, the new X-minute city concept allows proximity thresholds to vary with spatial context, mobility conditions, and service distribution. This paper develops an operational framework with the aim to examine and highlight spatial accessibility patterns from an X-minute city perspective, using the relatively urbanized area of the Netherlands as a national-scale case study. Accessibility is analyzed at the building level using OpenStreetMap data and a combination of object-based k-nearest-neighbor measures, distance-decay functions, inequality metrics, Average Nearest Neighbor analysis, and quantile regression. Concepts from central place theory are employed as an interpretive lens to understand service clustering and accessibility patterns, rather than as a formal model to be tested. The results show pronounced spatial disparities in accessibility between urban and rural areas, as well as substantial variation within cities. Major urban centers such as Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Utrecht exhibit high accessibility levels due to dense service provision, while peripheral and rural areas face systematically lower accessibility. Next accessibility outcomes also differ sharply across population groups. Elderly residents and groups reliant on walking experience the highest levels of inequality, with accessibility distributions remaining highly uneven at short-distance thresholds. Cycling expands the range of effective activity spaces and reduces inequality, but does not offset structural disadvantages in areas with sparse service provision. The findings point to the limits of uniform proximity targets and reveal the need for context-sensitive accessibility planning that explicitly accounts for service distribution, mobility constraints, and population heterogeneity within national urban systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091726000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 15-minute city concept has gained prominence in urban planning as a framework linking proximity, mobility, and quality of life at the intra-urban scale. An open question is whether this concept remains meaningful when applied to spatially connected urban regions or national urban systems. To address this issue, the new X-minute city concept allows proximity thresholds to vary with spatial context, mobility conditions, and service distribution. This paper develops an operational framework with the aim to examine and highlight spatial accessibility patterns from an X-minute city perspective, using the relatively urbanized area of the Netherlands as a national-scale case study. Accessibility is analyzed at the building level using OpenStreetMap data and a combination of object-based k-nearest-neighbor measures, distance-decay functions, inequality metrics, Average Nearest Neighbor analysis, and quantile regression. Concepts from central place theory are employed as an interpretive lens to understand service clustering and accessibility patterns, rather than as a formal model to be tested. The results show pronounced spatial disparities in accessibility between urban and rural areas, as well as substantial variation within cities. Major urban centers such as Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Utrecht exhibit high accessibility levels due to dense service provision, while peripheral and rural areas face systematically lower accessibility. Next accessibility outcomes also differ sharply across population groups. Elderly residents and groups reliant on walking experience the highest levels of inequality, with accessibility distributions remaining highly uneven at short-distance thresholds. Cycling expands the range of effective activity spaces and reduces inequality, but does not offset structural disadvantages in areas with sparse service provision. The findings point to the limits of uniform proximity targets and reveal the need for context-sensitive accessibility planning that explicitly accounts for service distribution, mobility constraints, and population heterogeneity within national urban systems.
x分钟城市的空间邻近性与可达性模式
在城市规划中,15分钟城市概念作为一种将城市内部的邻近性、流动性和生活质量联系起来的框架已经得到了突出的体现。一个悬而未决的问题是,这一概念在应用于空间连接的城市区域或国家城市系统时是否仍然有意义。为了解决这个问题,新的x分钟城市概念允许距离阈值随空间环境、交通条件和服务分布而变化。本文开发了一个操作框架,旨在从x分钟城市的角度审视和突出空间可达性模式,并以荷兰相对城市化的地区作为全国范围的案例研究。使用OpenStreetMap数据和基于对象的k-最近邻度量、距离衰减函数、不平等度量、平均最近邻分析和分位数回归的组合,在建筑层面分析可达性。中心地点理论的概念被用作理解服务聚类和可访问性模式的解释透镜,而不是作为要测试的正式模型。结果表明,城市和农村可达性存在明显的空间差异,城市内部也存在较大差异。阿姆斯特丹、鹿特丹和乌得勒支等主要城市中心由于密集的服务提供而表现出较高的可达性水平,而外围和农村地区则面临系统性的低可达性。其次,无障碍结果在不同人群之间也有很大差异。老年居民和依赖步行的群体经历的不平等程度最高,可达性分布在短距离阈值上仍然高度不平衡。自行车扩大了有效活动空间的范围,减少了不平等,但并不能抵消服务供应稀少地区的结构性劣势。研究结果指出了统一接近目标的局限性,并揭示了在国家城市系统中明确考虑服务分布、流动性约束和人口异质性的上下文敏感的可达性规划的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书