Quantum federated learning for autonomous vehicle cybersecurity: An analytical review of architectures and threat landscapes

IF 2.9 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
MethodsX Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2026.103990
Sowmya T, Raghavendra M Devadas
{"title":"Quantum federated learning for autonomous vehicle cybersecurity: An analytical review of architectures and threat landscapes","authors":"Sowmya T,&nbsp;Raghavendra M Devadas","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2026.103990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid rollout of autonomous vehicles (AVs), many AV criminal attacks form one of the biggest cybersecurity attack surfaces in contemporary infrastructure. But there are also the AV subsystems—LiDAR, radar, cameras, GPS, CAN buses, and V2X communications—all of which expose separate exploit vectors that would threaten both passenger safety as well as traffic. Centralized machine learning has been utilised for intrusion detection, but privacy issues, scalability limitations, and susceptibility to quantum-enabled adversaries have motivated interest in Federated Learning (FL) as a distributed approach. On the one hand, vehicles operating on RSA- and ECC-based protocols will become insecure due to quantum effects, motivating the need for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) [7], or any alternative to current systems. This seminal work proposes a summarization of Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) research specifically for AV cybersecurity. The contributions are: (i) a multi-dimensional risk matrix for AV attack priorities; (ii) a cross-study synthesis of gaps in FL-IDS deployment; (iii) comparative analysis across QKD, PQC and hybrid models of quantum security transition; (iv) construction of a QFL reference architecture with seven gaps agenda and (v) structured 2025–2030 road-map. The analysis shows that neither FL nor quantum security of it alone is strictly sufficient, and their togetherness in the hinge point between them — QFL — is the most urgent way forward for securing autonomous vehicles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18446,"journal":{"name":"MethodsX","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 103990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MethodsX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215016126002086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid rollout of autonomous vehicles (AVs), many AV criminal attacks form one of the biggest cybersecurity attack surfaces in contemporary infrastructure. But there are also the AV subsystems—LiDAR, radar, cameras, GPS, CAN buses, and V2X communications—all of which expose separate exploit vectors that would threaten both passenger safety as well as traffic. Centralized machine learning has been utilised for intrusion detection, but privacy issues, scalability limitations, and susceptibility to quantum-enabled adversaries have motivated interest in Federated Learning (FL) as a distributed approach. On the one hand, vehicles operating on RSA- and ECC-based protocols will become insecure due to quantum effects, motivating the need for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) [7], or any alternative to current systems. This seminal work proposes a summarization of Quantum Federated Learning (QFL) research specifically for AV cybersecurity. The contributions are: (i) a multi-dimensional risk matrix for AV attack priorities; (ii) a cross-study synthesis of gaps in FL-IDS deployment; (iii) comparative analysis across QKD, PQC and hybrid models of quantum security transition; (iv) construction of a QFL reference architecture with seven gaps agenda and (v) structured 2025–2030 road-map. The analysis shows that neither FL nor quantum security of it alone is strictly sufficient, and their togetherness in the hinge point between them — QFL — is the most urgent way forward for securing autonomous vehicles.

Abstract Image

自动驾驶汽车网络安全的量子联合学习:架构和威胁景观的分析回顾
随着自动驾驶汽车(AV)的快速推广,许多自动驾驶犯罪攻击构成了当代基础设施中最大的网络安全攻击面之一。但也有自动驾驶子系统——激光雷达、雷达、摄像头、GPS、CAN总线和V2X通信——所有这些都暴露了可能威胁乘客安全和交通的单独攻击载体。集中式机器学习已被用于入侵检测,但隐私问题、可扩展性限制以及对量子攻击的易感性激发了人们对联邦学习(FL)作为分布式方法的兴趣。一方面,由于量子效应,在基于RSA和ecc的协议上运行的车辆将变得不安全,从而激发了对量子密钥分发(QKD)、后量子加密(PQC)[7]或任何替代当前系统的需求。这项开创性的工作提出了量子联邦学习(QFL)研究的总结,特别是针对AV网络安全。贡献是:(i) AV攻击优先级的多维风险矩阵;(ii)交叉研究综合FL-IDS部署的差距;(iii)量子安全跃迁的QKD、PQC和混合模型的比较分析;(iv)构建具有七个缺口议程的QFL参考架构和(v)结构化的2025-2030年路线图。分析表明,光靠量子安全技术和量子安全技术都不足以保证自动驾驶汽车的安全,二者之间的结合点——量子安全技术的紧密结合是保证自动驾驶汽车安全的当务之急。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MethodsX
MethodsX Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
314
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书